Quote:
Posted By JackS15 on 10/04/2022 10:42 AM
No it was not sexist I can careless that she is a woman. Someone mentioned they may being struggling and i pointed out that the person lied to get the affordable unit. The multi bedroom unit should have been for a family instead of one person. They put these restrictions to help the many not for one person to be selfish. If she wanted an affordable unit she should have said the truth and she wouldn't be in this financial burden she is in right now.
All right.
Evidently all readers here should just know
a priori [wink] that "affordable unit" means a unit over which either the Boston Housing Authority; the Boston Planning Department; or both have a lot of control (via deed restrictions that the city sets in advance of completion of the condo), including setting
income limits for
households of various sizes.
JackS16 has said elsewhere that his condo's units are sold via the BHA's "affordable lottery." I gather one does not get into the lottery for any particular unit unless one first meets the criteria for the particular lottery.
On the one hand, the deadbeat here allegedly claimed, under some kind of oath with legal force (I bet), that her household consisted of two and had such-and-such income. She got into the lottery and won the right to buy the unit.
But I think the blame here should land far more on the city for not verifying the woman's household qualified for the lottery. I would let this aspect go (as I believe JackS16 is doing). As for the assessments owed, and if this is the first serious delinquency: Go after her full force.
Credit to KerryL1 for getting the thread re-directed to this path.