💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

FlynnD (Illinois)
Posts: 9
Posted:
Hello, new member here. I can't find the answer to this question anywhere online.

Here's the short version: Can the board of our HOA levy a special assessment for repairs on only SOME of the units, because only those units will benefit? Here's the longer version:

My HOA is a 15-unit historic coop building in Champaign, IL. As a coop, our ownership is divided into shares of the corporation, with some units having more shares than others based on square footage. All 15 units share the same main, brick masonry building, but there are 3 units that have a special feature of a wood-constructed "sunroom" which is cantilevered off the back of the building (see photo here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Tq4kSDW94vvqkBcb4N8ENU4JS_hofONg/view?usp=sharing). ONLY these 3 units derive benefit from these sunrooms. Now, these three units do have extra share ownership, and thus pay extra HOA fees, but the extra they pay is insufficient to cover the additional maintenance these unique additions require. I expect that the extra share they own was sufficient when our building was built in 1920, but now, 102 years later, the unique construction of these rooms makes them require much more maintenance. We cannot let the individual owners of these units maintain the structure of the sunrooms independently, as this would be too risky and if, for instance, one collapsed, as the entire value of the building would be in jeopardy.

So, the next time these sunrooms require special maintenance, can our board assess just these three units for the repairs?

Thanks in advance.
-Flynn
The Glenn Building Corporation
Champaign, IL
AugustinD
Posts: 1,027
Posted:
FlynnD, read your Declaration and Bylaws closely. To have verbiage saying that some units may be assessed for repairs/maintenance when the repairs/maintenance benefits only those units is not uncommon.

For now: I suspect in this situation, the goal should be to minimize conflict such that attorney's fees start to become large for either side here.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Flynn,

Please read the posting rules (click the smiley face that says posting rules at the top of every page).
Mentioning of Association names are not allowed.

As Aug has pointed out, this will depend on the verbiage in your governing documents regarding special assessments.
FlynnD (Illinois)
Posts: 9
Posted:
My apologies about mentioning the association name.

So, what I'm hearing is that there's nothing against the law about assessing some units, I think. As a small association where everyone knows each other, modifying our bylaws is easily done, and they currently do not have any stipulation at all about special assessments.
FlynnD (Illinois)
Posts: 9
Posted:
My apologies about mentioning the association name.

So, what I'm hearing is that there's nothing against the law about assessing some units, I think. As a small association where everyone knows each other, modifying our bylaws is easily done, and they currently do not have any stipulation at all about special assessments.
FlynnD (Illinois)
Posts: 9
Posted:
My apologies about mentioning the association name.

So, what I'm hearing is that there's nothing against the law about assessing some units, I think. As a small association where everyone knows each other, modifying our bylaws is easily done, and they currently do not have any stipulation at all about special assessments.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By FlynnD on 08/19/2022 9:34 AM
My apologies about mentioning the association name.

So, what I'm hearing is that there's nothing against the law about assessing some units, I think.

What you should be hearing is that it depends on your governing documents.

Sometimes a special assessment has to be applied to all.
Sometimes a special assessment can be applied to a few.

It all depends on what your governing documents say regarding special assessments.
AugustinD
Posts: 1,027
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By FlynnD on 08/19/2022 9:34 AM
So, what I'm hearing is that there's nothing against the law about assessing some units, I think.
This is not what has been posted.

Look in your Bylaws and Declaration to see what they say about assessments.

Quote:

As a small association where everyone knows each other, modifying our bylaws is easily done, and they currently do not have any stipulation at all about special assessments.
If your bylaws and declaration currently lack a provision that justifies assessing some but not all units for a repair/maintenance, then amending the bylaws or declaration to say otherwise likely would not be retroactive. Why? because the courts say the bylaws and declaration are a contract. A deal's a deal, and it's not fair to change the terms of the contract so as to force certain parties to have to pay more when this is not what these certain parties agreed to.

You're going to have to do some study. Feel free to post any sections of your bylaws or declaration that you think are relevant here.
FlynnD (Illinois)
Posts: 9
Posted:
I appreciate you helping dig into this! Very interesting about changes to the bylaws not applying retroactively. In this case, there is no urgent maintenance on the horizon for these units; my question is only about putting our affairs in order in anticipation of future repairs. If I seem unconcerned with what the current bylaws say (and only concerned with applicable law), it is because changing bylaws and other governing documents will not be as difficult as it will be in larger HOAs, as our board (and all shareholders, in fact) is very level headed and friendly with each other. However, if changes won't apply retroactively to owners who purchased before the bylaw change, that would be a problem.

Here are the sections of our bylaws that might be relevant:

Article III—Directors
Sec.10. Power to pass By-Laws
The Board of Directors shall have full power to adopt, alter, amend, or repeal the
By-Laws.

Article V—Dividends and Finance
Sec.4. Assessment
The Directors may at any regular meeting, or at any special meeting where such action
has been duly announced in the call, approve dues to be charged the shareholders,
which dues shall be levied against shareholders on the basis of the number of shares
owned by each shareholder. Such dues shall be used to defray the costs of insurance,
taxes, maintenance of the building and such other expenses as may be necessary to the
proper operation of the Corporation. If a unit owner is in default in the monthly
payment of the aforesaid charges or assessments for thirty (30) days, the Board of
Directors may bring suit for and on behalf of themselves and as representatives of all
unit owners to enforce collection thereof or to foreclosure the lien therefore as
hereinafter provided; and there shall be added to the amount due the costs of said
suit, and other fees and expenses together with legal interest and reasonable
attorneys’ fees to be fixed by the Court. As a further and additional remedy in the
event of default in the monthly payment of charges and assessments, the Board of
Directors shall have the possessor rights.

SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
I would think this would have been addressed in your reserve study - when was the last time your association did one (they should be done at least every five years)? If it's been longer - or you haven't had one at all, get it done - preferably before the year's out. Consider how this thing is set up, this may also require an engineer of some sort to look at the area to supplement what the reserve specialist finds, or the specialist can find someone to take a look.

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
I would think this would have been addressed in your reserve study - when was the last time your association did one (they should be done at least every five years)? If it's been longer - or you haven't had one at all, get it done - preferably before the year's out. Consider how this thing is set up, this may also require an engineer of some sort to look at the area to supplement what the reserve specialist finds, or the specialist can find someone to take a look.

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
FlynnD (Illinois)
Posts: 9
Posted:
We have never had a reserve study, and as far as I know it has never even been discussed or thought of. Since I've taken over as HOA president in January 2021, I've been looking into it, but I'm not sure we can afford it with an association as small as ours, with an annual budget of only $65,000. We know we don't have enough reserves at the moment, but I've aggressively cut costs and increased the dues by 10% so we are on track to turn a significant profit over the coming years, so I anticipate that whatever the reserve study finds, we are on track to meet in the next 5 years anyway.

I have had a structural engineer come in to inspect, and he found no urgent issues to address other than one that we already addressed this year (epoxy injections in cracks on our concrete balconies). The engineer didn't mention anything at all about the sunrooms, so this discussion is all just proactive on my part.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Flynn

Not to play lawyer but your posting seems to say all shall pay based on the shares they hold and as of now the dues are higher on the 3 units with sun rooms as they own more shares.
FlynnD (Illinois)
Posts: 9
Posted:
JohnC, I'm not a lawyer but I agree with you. The sunroom units have 1 extra share, which amounts to an extra $13.25 per month that they each pay in HOA dues. I'm sure that single extra share was considered enough in 1920.

The other option I have considered to defray future maintenance on these sunrooms is to increase the sunroom owners' share ownership (probably just by an extra 1 share, but we would want to carefully consider this amount), which then would eliminate the need for this question about special assessments.
AugustinD
Posts: 1,027
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By FlynnD on 08/19/2022 10:39 AM
I appreciate you helping dig into this! Very interesting about changes to the bylaws not applying retroactively.
Changes won't apply retroactively to certain "situations" that exist right now or existed in the past. Changes can be applied that apply to situations going forward.
Quote:

In this case, there is no urgent maintenance on the horizon for these units; my question is only about putting our affairs in order in anticipation of future repairs. If I seem unconcerned with what the current bylaws say (and only concerned with applicable law), it is because changing bylaws and other governing documents will not be as difficult as it will be in larger HOAs, as our board (and all shareholders, in fact) is very level headed and friendly with each other.
Got it.

Quote:
However, if changes won't apply retroactively to owners who purchased before the bylaw change, that would be a problem.
To repeat, see above. Your HOA/COA may amend the bylaws to address situations that arise in the future, regardless of who is the owner right now and who is the owner in the future, with some caveats. More below.

Quote:

Here are the sections of our bylaws that might be relevant:

Article III—Directors
Sec.10. Power to pass By-Laws
The Board of Directors shall have full power to adopt, alter, amend, or repeal the
By-Laws.

Article V—Dividends and Finance
Sec.4. Assessment
The Directors may at any regular meeting, or at any special meeting where such action
has been duly announced in the call, approve dues to be charged the shareholders,
which dues shall be levied against shareholders on the basis of the number of shares
owned by each shareholder. Such dues shall be used to defray the costs of insurance,
taxes, maintenance of the building and such other expenses as may be necessary to the
proper operation of the Corporation. If a unit owner is in default in the monthly
payment of the aforesaid charges or assessments for thirty (30) days, the Board of
Directors may bring suit for and on behalf of themselves and as representatives of all
unit owners to enforce collection thereof or to foreclosure the lien therefore as
hereinafter provided; and there shall be added to the amount due the costs of said
suit, and other fees and expenses together with legal interest and reasonable
attorneys’ fees to be fixed by the Court. As a further and additional remedy in the
event of default in the monthly payment of charges and assessments, the Board of
Directors shall have the possessor rights.
Thank you kindly for quoting this. Nationwide most of the time a HOA/COA board does not have the power to amend the bylaws. Instead, most of the time amendment of the bylaws may be done only by the owners en masse.

This is a co-op, so maybe the board having this power (to amend the bylaws) is more usual for co-ops.

What year was the co-op established as a corporation?

What is the date on the by-laws?

How many directors are there?

Where is the number of shares each owner has recorded? In the Bylaws? In the Declaration of CC&Rs? Somewhere else? Does the board have the lawful power to amend the number of shares each unit has?

I am going to snoop around Illinois statutes in a bit and see if there's some relevant discussion there.

For COAs/HOAs nationwide, it is a big deal for a minority (in this case, potentially the Board) to suddenly amend the governing documents (bylaws, Declaration of CC&Rs, Articles of Incorporation) such that some owners are paying more for the regular assessment than was originally specified when they bought. This hearkens back to my comments about retroactive-ness.
AugustinD
Posts: 1,027
Posted:
From a quick check, I suspect the number of shares each co-op unit has is given in the Articles of Incorporation. Illinois statutes seem to indicate only a 2/3rds vote of the owners can amend the Articles of Incorporation?

This needs triple checking.

FlynnD, do your co-op's Articles of Incorporation give the number of shares each unit is assigned?
FlynnD (Illinois)
Posts: 9
Posted:
AugustinD, you are very thorough! Replies in line below:

Thank you kindly for quoting this. Nationwide most of the time a HOA/COA board does not have the power to amend the bylaws. Instead, most of the time amendment of the bylaws may be done only by the owners en masse.

>> Even though the bylaws technically allow us to, we would probably discuss this at an annual shareholders meeting and get approval to change the bylaws there by shareholder vote. Historically, our association has not really followed our own rules as written, but rather more like "whatever people vote on -- and whoever shows up to that vote -- is adopted". It's been very laissez-faire, and no one really complains about much.

What year was the co-op established as a corporation?

>> Established in 1920

What is the date on the by-laws?

>> Most recently amended in 2014

How many directors are there?

>> 5, but like all the other loose decision making here, directors meetings are "whoever shows up". We have 4 people who are technically "alternate" directors but, if they show up and vote, their votes weigh equally with the other 5, and the same if any other shareholder wants to attend a board meeting. My friends who are in larger HOAs find this bizarre, but it's the way its always worked here, as I understand it.

Where is the number of shares each owner has recorded? In the Bylaws? In the Declaration of CC&Rs? Somewhere else? Does the board have the lawful power to amend the number of shares each unit has?

>> The number of shares is recorded in our Articles of Incorporation, dated 1920. However, this document has been amended in 2017 with "Articles of Amendment" to extend the lifetime of the corporation (which was originally 99 years), and I expect we could file similar Articles of Amendment if we needed to issue new shares. On this matter, you are correct that the documents from the state are clear that we need a 2/3 shareholder vote, but again this would likely not be a problem to achieve given how the shareholders have worked together in the past.

AugustinD
Posts: 1,027
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By FlynnD on 08/19/2022 12:49 PM
The number of shares is recorded in our Articles of Incorporation, dated 1920. [snippage] On this matter, you are correct that the documents from the state are clear that we need a 2/3 shareholder vote, but again this would likely not be a problem to achieve given how the shareholders have worked together in the past.
Then this begs the question of whether a super-majority may impose its will on a minority. It is something the courts have addressed with HOAs/COAs at times. Example:

A HOA has 100 owners, each with one vote. A super majority of 95 owners votes amend the governing documents to say that the other five owners shall pay the assessments for all 100 homes.

What would a court say?

From my reading, the courts say that, while the original covenants can be somewhat unreasonable (it's all in the eye of the beholder), amendments have to be "reasonable." I expect a judge would rule that the amendment above is unreasonable and so invalid.

You talked about changing the share percentage of some of the units to a higher percentage, via amendment of the Articles of Incorporation. Try to be reasonable. Come up with arguments based in costs that are clearly attributable to certain units. Try to get 100% buy-in. Definitely use an attorney.

Be prepared for those owning one of the units whose percentage ownership would rise to say no way. After all, these folks might say, it's all about location, location, location. The appearance of their units adds value to the other owners' units. Plus this minority might say, "Um, a deal's a deal, isn't it? Didn't everyone who bought here know the share percentages in advance? If they did not. This is on them."

As for special assessing some units but not all: I think this may start treading on the Articles of Incorporation. I would not attempt it without 100% owner approval of an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation.

About ignoring bylaws: I think this is a lot of risk to take with a corporation, especially one where people's biggest investment may reside. Else I am going to leave the issue of ignoring the bylaws et cetera alone for now.
AugustinD
Posts: 1,027
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AugustinD on 08/19/2022 1:28 PM
Then this begs the question of whether a super-majority may impose its will on a minority. It is something the courts have addressed with HOAs/COAs at times. Example:

A HOA has 100 owners, each with one vote. A super majority of 95 owners votes amend the governing documents to say that the other five owners shall pay the assessments for all 100 homes.

What would a court say?

From my reading, the courts say that, while the original covenants can be somewhat unreasonable (it's all in the eye of the beholder), amendments have to be "reasonable." I expect a judge would rule that the amendment above is unreasonable and so invalid.
By the way, the courts have at times called such scenarios, "the tyranny of the majority," going back over a century to the writings of a certain government philosopher and economist.
FlynnD (Illinois)
Posts: 9
Posted:
Your point about making doubly sure of what we are doing, with ideally 100% approval is well taken. And I would have a thorough business case for any change in the way fees are assessed, since it would disproportionately affect 3 shareholders out of 15.

But it sounds like my questions about this have been answered, I appreciate the help from everyone!

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here