AdamL1 (UnitedStates)
Posts: 559
Posts: 559
Posted:
Got a general question about this kind of topic. I'll try to describe the physical layout.
- There's a strip of common area in my HOA that runs behind about 20 homes. within this strip, utility companies have an easement to manage access to their systems.
- within this total section, there is row of chainlink fencing, along the road, and then a row of chainlink fencing separating the utility access road from the regular HOA common area, that is behind the row of houses.
Historically, the utility access section has always had a gate and sign saying "NO TRESPASSING" but has never been locked and enforced, so people use it as part of a walking path. This means that random people are walking along a path right behind the row of HOA homes, with a chainlink fence between them.
The HOA has neglected and failed to maintain the fencing. Posts are falling over, there's giant holes torn in the fencing, tree branches fallen onto the fence, etc. Dogs come running through the fence right up to backyards as well as the constant state of 'living in a fishbowl' where all the walkers can look into homes and backyards.
The issues to discuss is:
- as this is common area, what is the expectation to fix and maintain the fence? at a minimum, the fence should be in a good state of repair. Who is responsible? If the HOA has been hemming and hawing for several years about it, can a Homeowner fix it themselves? If they do fix it, can homeowners bill the HOA for the cost?
- What is the requirement or liability for the HOA to protect this section of the common area? They are not locking the gate and not enforcing the NO TRESPASSING. Can a homeowner petition to force adherence to this?
- Rather than enforcing the NO TRESPASSING, can a homeowner just put up 'privacy screening' along the chainlink fence? Then, as an added bonus, once the privacy screen is up, the home's value has increased (in theory). If the HOA takes down the privacy screen, that would actively be devaluing a property. Thoughts on this topic?
Ultimately, who/what/how is responsible to force repair and maintenance of common area, as well as common-sense privacy screening for 20 homes along the fence line?
- There's a strip of common area in my HOA that runs behind about 20 homes. within this strip, utility companies have an easement to manage access to their systems.
- within this total section, there is row of chainlink fencing, along the road, and then a row of chainlink fencing separating the utility access road from the regular HOA common area, that is behind the row of houses.
Historically, the utility access section has always had a gate and sign saying "NO TRESPASSING" but has never been locked and enforced, so people use it as part of a walking path. This means that random people are walking along a path right behind the row of HOA homes, with a chainlink fence between them.
The HOA has neglected and failed to maintain the fencing. Posts are falling over, there's giant holes torn in the fencing, tree branches fallen onto the fence, etc. Dogs come running through the fence right up to backyards as well as the constant state of 'living in a fishbowl' where all the walkers can look into homes and backyards.
The issues to discuss is:
- as this is common area, what is the expectation to fix and maintain the fence? at a minimum, the fence should be in a good state of repair. Who is responsible? If the HOA has been hemming and hawing for several years about it, can a Homeowner fix it themselves? If they do fix it, can homeowners bill the HOA for the cost?
- What is the requirement or liability for the HOA to protect this section of the common area? They are not locking the gate and not enforcing the NO TRESPASSING. Can a homeowner petition to force adherence to this?
- Rather than enforcing the NO TRESPASSING, can a homeowner just put up 'privacy screening' along the chainlink fence? Then, as an added bonus, once the privacy screen is up, the home's value has increased (in theory). If the HOA takes down the privacy screen, that would actively be devaluing a property. Thoughts on this topic?
Ultimately, who/what/how is responsible to force repair and maintenance of common area, as well as common-sense privacy screening for 20 homes along the fence line?