💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

RobertT (Colorado)
Posts: 40
Posted:
I was wondering if you can be issued a Recreational Vechicle Voliation for a Truck with a slide in Camper which has been in the parking lot of my Building for the Last 18 years.

I have read the Delclaration and Trucks with slide in campers are not listed.

The declaration shows that you cannot have a Trailer, Camper, Mobile Home or Motor home.

Any Clarification would be great am I "Grandfathered In" ?

Bob
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
RobertT, you can be issued a violation for a truck camper based on the restriction you posted. If you have to ask if your truck camper is grandfathered then it probably isn't.
RobertT (Colorado)
Posts: 40
Posted:
Roger,

I don't understand it has been there for 18 years and I only use it for Business purposes.

I was told that it was OK... Truck campers were not included....years ago by the Maintance man

Can you tell me why after 18 years and no declaration change that now I must remove it. We have received scores of notices in the past and only now must I suffer.

I know you are aware of my other post.... Do you see anything here like Targeting and Harassment....

This must be some mistake or a personnel attack on me. Who's the grandpa?

Highline Fellow
WayneB3 (NV)
Posts: 51
Posted:
18 years...time to get yourself something new. A big van- like a sprinter.
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By WayneB3 on 12/09/2007 11:24 PM
18 years...time to get yourself something new. A big van- like a sprinter.

As long as this is acceptable under your rules and regulations.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RobertT on 12/09/2007 8:16 PM
Roger,

I don't understand it has been there for 18 years and I only use it for Business purposes.

I was told that it was OK... Truck campers were not included....years ago by the Maintance man

Can you tell me why after 18 years and no declaration change that now I must remove it. We have received scores of notices in the past and only now must I suffer.

I know you are aware of my other post.... Do you see anything here like Targeting and Harassment....

This must be some mistake or a personnel attack on me. Who's the grandpa?

Highline Fellow

Robert a maintenance man does not have the power to say what is or isn't acceptable - at least in our complex. Also if this is one of the deadbeat, do nothing maintenance men you wrote about in one of your other posts; I would suspect his accuracy anyway. The BOD may not have been aware of your truck camper before or previous boards may not have chosen to pursue it but unless you have a written waiver the current BOD has the right to act on this. If you've received scores of notices in the past then this doesn't seem like selective enforcement.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Robert,
I agree with everyone and you won't want to hear this. It sounds like your original documents do not allow campers and recreational vehicles. That is what you have. Because this has been in your original docs from day one, you have been in violation since day one. You have been a very lucky man because no one has enforced on you since then and grandfathering has nothing to do with it.

Do you have a new Board who decided to do their job? Maybe there is another owner who wants to bring in a similar vehicle and they were denied. I can hear him ask--"why does Robert be allowed to have his?" Then the wars begin. Selective enforcement starts so the Board has to start enforcing on everyone, and that includes you. This should have been addressed 18 years ago. Sorry!

How do you keep an 18 year old camper running?
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Robert,
Suppose one of us would say to you, this is a clear case of targeting because you have had some trouble with your regime. How do you expect us to answer that on the information that you provide? How can you expect an answer and what would you do with this information? I'm curious? I would suggest you make your peace with your board and work that out, and you know as well as we, a camper is a campre, a maintainence man is not the place to turn to get answers like that. You also know a "grandfather clause" is just that. A clause wrtitten to allow you or someone to do what they have done in the past because the rules are changing. I suspect your documents state something to the effect that the failure of the association to enforce a written requirement in the documents does not forbid them from enforcing the requirement at any time. Standard stuff that goes in most CC&r's.
RobertT (Colorado)
Posts: 40
Posted:
Thank you for your input. I remember being told that a camper in the back of a truck was ok.

Everything seems to be happening at the same time as this petition . We recently had a major break and several flat tires. The Maintenance company has allowed the trash dump building to remain in disrepair for 4 weeks allowing the Weather to damage the building structure. The Board of Director has cited our building for Fire code violations and Balcony flower boxes

Just now... as you know... I received a Notice to remove my truck which have been on site without any Violation notice for 18 Years. It is obvious that they cannot all of a sudden make the owner remove it. The truck is Considered "Grandfathered in".

Does this look like harassment?

Thanks to all...
RobertT (Colorado)
Posts: 40
Posted:
Wayne,

What do you know about the Sprinter is there a camper package?

Thanks
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
RobertT they sited you for fire code violations for doing something your CC&R's prohibit, I'm just guessing but I'm betting the flowerboxes are also either not allowed or wrong. We just rebuilt the decks in our complex and are prohibiting homeowners from attaching flowerboxes to them; they can buy the kind that hangs over them like saddlebags but they can't attach them. The fact that our BOD is actively pursuing this it does not mean they're picking on people.

If you got by with parking there in violation for 18 years, that's what you did; you got by violating a clause YOU agreed to when you bought. The only way the BOD is picking on you is if your neighbor has a camper too and they don't make them remove it. The only way your vehicle would be "grandfathered" would be if the BOD passed a rule to allow certain types of campers that did not include yours; then they probably would have to allow yours to stay.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Also even if the maintenance man said it was OK, if you didn't get it in writing it doesn't count.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
WayneB3 (NV)
Posts: 51
Posted:
The sprinter comes cargo or passenger variety. We had a h/o who wanted to buy a raised roof sprinter and we have eight foot vehicle height limitations in our docs. We decided to grant an exception given the fact that they have a large family and we wanted to be somewhat progressive in our thinking.

We'd probably allow Robert's pick-up camper too because 18 years is a long time and he'd have a pretty good estoppal by laches defense.

PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
RobertT: To state that ..."It is obvious that they cannot all of a sudden make the owner remove it. The truck is Considered "Grandfathered in" makes no sense. If you were 'grandfathered in', have you received notice from the Board to that effect? Why have you now received another violation notice?

No, they are not picking on you, or harrassing you. The Board is fulfilling their responsibility in citing those who are in violation and going against what the legal documents state. They have a duty, as you, yourself have stated in your previous post, to ensure that all is being taken care of according to the documents--which means to alert residents to violations. It's not nice to hear, I understand. However, your conversation needs to take place with those in authority--the Board, not the maintenance man.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Wow. Me wants a Sprinter!!

I agree. An 18-year-old vehicle is not worth fighting about. I'm amazed it's still running.

Bite the bullet and get the Sprinter!

RobertT (Colorado)
Posts: 40
Posted:
I only mentioned the Maintenance man because during the last 10 years I have heard on two occasions that first the Declaration does allow Trucks with Campers in the bed and Second that I have special permission.

I did now recall that I was tagged several years ago and it was decided that Trucks with campers on them are excluded from the definitions. Despite that fact there is a "statue of limitations" Law to any violation of the declaration and it is long past the time to impose a Violation.

I am being singled out to shut up.

You are kidding yourself if you think I am not being harassed based on my Petition organizing the community to Audit the current Management company and replace the Board of Directors.

Wayne brings up another good point; the "estoppal by laches defense", it was up to the Board to site me years ago and they have no right to come after me now.

I am indeed "Grandfathered in"

Paul you cite that I am not being Harassed by the board even though I have received 3 Citation letters in the mail of which two were Violations in the last week. All of this started when I attached my name to the "Mission Statement" for the Highline Fellows group as the author on our Web site.

Remember that the President authorized the Maintenance man to Rip the Petition box down and steal the petitions

If the president installed the wrong color windows in his Townhouse and is in Violation of the code. If he does not pick up the waste from his dog every night when he walks both of them. If he does not received a Violation notice and make the change of colors. We have a double standard.

I would say if I am getting letters about my Flower pots, Fire code violations and Truck in the parking lot that has been there for 18 years. All this during the last week.. Then we are talking about harassment considering that I never received any Violations over a 18 Year period.

Bob
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Bob, you may be correct. You may be being targeted.

However, if you sense that is the case, then it would probably be in your best interest to do a short inventory and make sure that you have no violation, inadvertent or otherwise, over which you can be targeted. Would probably only take a few minutes and involve a tucking away of one thing or another, and not a big huge deal. This is why my husband always says to me "Shelley, Low Profile. Maintain a Low Profile. . ." Needless to say, I ignore him.

On the other hand, at least according to our documents, there is not "statute of limitations" on bringing forth a violation. In fact, if you received notices a few years ago, then . . . when you say "it was decided," my question is "by whom?"

Anyway, our CC&Rs state that failure to bring timely notice of violation does not waive future right of ability to enforce.

This is in response to "it was up to the Board to site me years ago and they have no right to come after me now." Because, at least in our documents, that's not the case.

Now, yours might be different. Could you share that passage with us so we can check it out?

Still thinking of your best interest here -- 18 years is a long time to have a vehicle, and I'm sure you two are best buds and all by now, but, seriously, consider the Sprinter thing. Looks awesome and they couldn't touch you over it!

(I'm sending the info to my husband as we speak . . .)

RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
RobertT, no one has the authority to "give you special permission" for something that violates the CC&Rs.

For permanent structures there is a 1 year timeframe in Colorado but since the truck camper is not a permanent fixture there is no statue of limitions.

You probably are being singled out because of your petition.

You are only grandfathered when the CC&Rs are amended and a grandfather clause was provided in the amendment and it applied to your situtation.
JanM (Texas)
Posts: 142
Posted:
Why would someone want to spend thousannds of dollars on a "sprinter" when they have a perfectly good vehicle they use for work? Plus RogerB made the point I was thinking, its not a permanent fixture.
RobertT (Colorado)
Posts: 40
Posted:
Roger,

That is the whole point is that I am not violating the CCR's because I donot have a recreational Vechicle. I have a Truck with a slide in Camper and that is why I have been able to keep my truck for so long without any Violation notices for 18 years.

I am going to take the " estoppal by laches defense" in this matter and if I do get stickered I will take the matter into the court system and contact the local authorities about being harrssed.

I am sick of these people thinking they can push anyone who trys to make a change or save money.

It's time for Change and Change will happen. We are in the process of getting a "Class Action Suit" against the mananagement company as others have been discriminated as well. We have a Lawyer.

We want to know were the money is going and why and we want them to show us the bill receipts. We want an Audit and a New Board of Directors that can save us money instead of throwing it away.

RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Jan in Texas,

Two quick reasons to get rid of old vehicle and buy new one.

New one does not violate covenants.

That is also #2.

How much thought do people give that break known covenants in their association?

Since I have broken more that one, I am surprised at the thought process we go through. First, assume we know the rule.

#1. I am going to do it anyway.
then we think after a while.

#2. Well old so and so does it so that makes it ok for me.

#3. Then we think, this is America, I can do what I want.

#4. Then it's, let them s---heads sue me, I'll take them to court and wipe this whole association off the map.

#5. Suppose I lose, it might cost me a ton of money, and I am still not going to be able to do what I want.

#6. Ok, I won't sue, but I'll go before the Board, I know old Harry on the Board, he will agree, and I can talk my way into it.

#7. Man, I tell you, no one knows anything around hear, that damn board played nice with me and still is going to fine me.

#8. That damned Joe Blank on the Board never did like me so this must be all his fault, they are targeting me.

#9. I'll fix their butts, I'll run for the Board and show them how this place should be run.

#10. Ah, to hell with it, it's not that important anyway, I'll just do it and forget about it. But, if anyones wants to know my opinion of how things are run around here, I will sure let them know a thing or two.

Pretty close to the truth.....huh?

MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Jan, I was being light-hearted.

Back to being serious (grudgingly) -- I am looking at the title to this thread: "Truck with Slide in Camper-Classification Needed."

Though you may not use your "slide in" Camper as an RV, it is still classified as one, so, at least in our HOA, it would fall under the restriction.

We do have one gentleman here with one of those (my husband so kindly reminded me). But the reason I didn't think of it is because he keeps it in his garage. Apparently he modified his garage door a few years ago to fit it in. I think it cost something like $1200 (at least that's what my husband says). He didn't even wait until he got a letter and he didn't ask permission or whatever. He is apparently aware of the CC&R restriction against those types of vehicles and took a responsible approach from the day he brought it home.

Anyway, good luck to you on your other concerns with the Management Company and the board.

Hope none of this detracts from your holiday spirit. Have a good one. (and put that Sprinter on your list to Santa -- shshshshshhhhh -- I'm putting it on mine!)
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
RobertT, I can not emphasize to strongly that removing the Board members who are doing a very poor job of managing your HOA is the most effect means for change to correct your problems. Whereas, suing the MC is not an effective solution. Please realize there are many attorneys who may tell you that you can win. But you can lose and may have to pay both parties legal costs. Meanwhile the attorney will always win their fees.

Do you realize:
a) The Management company is most likely covered by your HOA's D&O insurance. So even if you win a law suit your will probably be paying for the cost of the increase in insurance.
b) The same Board will still be there after the law suit.
c) The same Management company may still be there after the law suit.
d) And finally the law suit will take a long time and be expensive compared to changing the Board and then the Management company.
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

RobertR1,
Are you the voice of experience or what? I'll bet in your younger days, you were a "Hoot" and still are. Everything that you said, I think that we have heard on this site. I think that we should put you "on call" to be our resident GO GIT UM GEORGIE. I love your looking at some of these situations thru the humor looking glass. Thanks, you make me chuckle.
WayneB3 (NV)
Posts: 51
Posted:
I've seen this before. The board and members decide to look the other way over the other's indiscretions. One day someone with nothing to lose thinks they're getting a raw deal and wants to open the books. Obviously the problems in this HOA run well beyond a camper shell.

RobertT (Colorado)
Posts: 40
Posted:
Roger,

You are right about any legal action since we already have a lawsuit against this HOA for a slip and fall for 1 million dollars. I have looked at the numbers and they do not appear correct based on my observations.

We as a community have allowed this board to continue raising the dues year after year and the place still looks like it is being ran by a bunch of crack heads.

The bottom line is that our petition requires 151 votes by owners and we have 75 people that are past dues that don't qualify and half the residents are renters. The petition is just and right and follows the guidelines set forth in the declaration. We just need 298 members to act.

We know the way to saving this community money is by starting over at the bottom. "What does it cost to run this place before any management or insurance company or employee's get paid"

Now let's talk about extra's. Like a Quality and competent Management company who cares about how this place looks by using a little "TLC". Paint and repair is the answer in the short term and rebuilding can come later if we protect what we have instead of letting it self destruct.

Example: If you know the roofs are leaking and you are running around fixing the ceilings and walls in the units why not fix the problem. No... I am not saying spend 90K on a new roof.. I am saying get a crew in here to Hot Tar the roofs until we can afford to replace them one at a time... I am saying fix the problem instead of ignoring the cause.

Rome was not built in one day and it will take the next 10 years to fix this place up but we can do it. We must start with looking at out current spending and making some reasonable decisions.

How can we cut cost and fix the broken things then rebuild slowy over a period of time using our savings.

We know for example that the Loose Alluminum wiring in the townhomes is costing our community 164K per year because of previous fires.... but we say that's the townhome's owners responsibliltiy instead of stepping in and getting it fixed. It would save 100K per year if we could get back to the normal insurance cost.

Basic Mathematics in looking at the budget is like a Tree falling down and crashing because it doesn't add up..Wasteful spending is ear splitting and loud. We can easily cut cost and still have a wonderful community to be proud
of it we try.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Donna,
I think humor has a place in everything, and a special place in HOA's.
I bet if the astronauts had a "buzz" detector and when they fly over Hoa that thing would have more schemes that the UN Building.

Anyway, answer me a question?
Is there a real difference between an HOA and a POA?

Thank you, I won't tell anyone what you tell me.
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Robert,
Don't tell anyone that I copied this for you. BUT!!!

Difference between a HOA and a POA may or may NOT have a difference. It could just be the same interchangeable term depending on state or other legal references originally used in your documentation.
If there is there is a difference then this is what it would be: A Homeowner's association is a corporation/business that was created by the developer/or maintained by the homeowners that is responsible for the maintenance of the common property which the homes are located on. The Homeowner's agree that EVERYONE has equal say or rights to the property they all share in the community.
A POA is: Property Owners Association. This means that their may or may NOT be a home located on the property the property owner owns. It is the piece of property itself that is maintained by ALL the owners. The properties may still work like common area with everyone sharing the rights or say in the operation/maintenance of the property.
Essentially, a HOA involves individual homeowners who must share the property around their homes, a POA involves the direct property with/without structures on it.
HOA/POA still may be For-Profit or Non-profit corporations. They don't have to be incorporated at all. They can have Convenants and & Restrictions or By-laws.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Thank you,
I will need a year ot two to think about that. Be assured no one knoes about this except you and I.
DJ1 (Ontario)
Posts: 798
Posted:
MicheleD,

Did the guy submit a ARC request to alter the exterior when he did the garage door, or did he violate one CCR to avoid violating another CCR?

Quote:
Posted By MicheleD on 12/11/2007 7:51 AM
Jan, I was being light-hearted.

Back to being serious (grudgingly) -- I am looking at the title to this thread: "Truck with Slide in Camper-Classification Needed."

Though you may not use your "slide in" Camper as an RV, it is still classified as one, so, at least in our HOA, it would fall under the restriction.

We do have one gentleman here with one of those (my husband so kindly reminded me). But the reason I didn't think of it is because he keeps it in his garage. Apparently he modified his garage door a few years ago to fit it in. I think it cost something like $1200 (at least that's what my husband says). He didn't even wait until he got a letter and he didn't ask permission or whatever. He is apparently aware of the CC&R restriction against those types of vehicles and took a responsible approach from the day he brought it home.

Anyway, good luck to you on your other concerns with the Management Company and the board.

Hope none of this detracts from your holiday spirit. Have a good one. (and put that Sprinter on your list to Santa -- shshshshshhhhh -- I'm putting it on mine!)

JanM (Texas)
Posts: 142
Posted:
If he did indeed buy a sprinter, I almost guarantee you that someone will complain saying it is a recreational or commercial vehicle and that there is probably something in his CCRs that address this. So another difference of opinion ensues and another "I'm gonna SUE, SUE, SUE". In my experience, there is always someone who has something to complain about. I agree that clarification is needed in so many areas but it is such a long and drawn out process that most folks just don't want to be bothered.
Be assured, I will have a wonderful Christmas and the same to ALL!
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Classification of the vehicle is always in need of clarification. Our Documents read that "IN event of a dispute as to the vehicles classification, the Official Florida TAG Registration and classification will be the determining factor as to the vehicles classification" That sounds easy.

Now, we have 2 Cadallac EXT's parked out overnight, against the Pick up truck covenant which requires them to be within the garages overnight.

One EXT is a 2002 which according to Cadallac is "the best of 2 worlds, - a PICK-UP TRUCK COMBINED WITH A SUV"

The second is a 2004 which Cadallac now describes as "Segmented" A SUV"

Both are IDENTICLE IN STYLE, SHAPE AND FEATURES. How is this enforced? We asked the Judge. Guess what, neither is a pickup truck. gO FIGURE THIS ONE OUT BECAUSE WE SURE COULDN"T. FLORIDA CLASSIFIED THEM AS PICKUP TRUCKS BUT THESE GUYS CHALLENGED ----AND WON.
WayneB3 (NV)
Posts: 51
Posted:
Semantics, eh? I always wondered how a newer Cadillac of any style could threaten property values.
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Wayne,
The issue was following the CC&R's. It had nothing to do with any resident not being okay with trucks and if it would reduce property values. Liking it or not, NO pickup trucks were allowed out. The arguement in court was --'IS IT OR IS IT NOT A PICKUP TRUCK?
Most of our residents had absolutely no issues with these truck/SUVs or whatever you want to call them. We had one Smart A** Lawyer resident who pointed it out to the Board, demanded that we enforce on them and when we did not act fast enough, she threatened to sue the BOD for not doing our fiducary duty. AND----she said that because she was an attorney, she could outlast us(the Board) Okay, now where did the Board have much of a choice. We are required in Florida to go to Mediation--went twice--and that did not work so off to court we went.

Moral of the story is, make sure that you are okay with all of your CC&Rs before the Developer gives you your turnover. It was right at turnover that this started so we did not have any time to amend the covenant on trucks.
WayneB3 (NV)
Posts: 51
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DonnaS on 12/12/2007 1:45 PM
It was right at turnover that this started so we did not have any time to amend the covenant on trucks.

It's good you realize they do need amending.
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Wayne,
It is amazing what a hot button this issue became in the community. We have 565 homes and need 2/3rds to pass an amendment or 373 votes to pass an amendment change. We have 3 Boards(sub assoc's) and 1 Master Association. That is 20 Board positions. (5 each & the Master) We took sort of a straw poll and guess what. The truck amendment will never pass and right now we believe mostly because these 2 truck guys caused so much anger and side taking in the community. Maybe when we get enough of the earlier residents changed to a different mind set but for now, it will never pass.
WayneB3 (NV)
Posts: 51
Posted:
I suppose the judge took care of the amendment for you. No need to waste the ink. I bet it shut up the PIA lawyer too.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
DJ1:

He didn't need to submit a request to alter the height or even the color of his garage door. (I believe he also painted it.)

Our CC&Rs don't require approval of those types of changes unless they are going to change the footprint of the home on the lot. (I.e., a deck, a patio, a shed, an in-ground pool, a fence, a pond, etc.)

Jan:

Our CC&Rs would not classify the Sprinter as either an RV OR a commercial vehicle. The only time it would fall into the commercial vehicle category is if: 1) they applied lettering/signage to the exterior or windows, or 2) if they attached ladder racks and/or PVC pipe carriers to the roof.

Otherwise, it's not an issue.

DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Au Contraire Mon Ami,

The Judge ruled that the classification was too vague, therefore it is considered under the current manufacturers classification, "A SUV" but that the protective covenant was clear to understand and enforceable" -- Pickup trucks must be parked within the improvement, otherwise known as the garage.
All pickup truck owners feel the same about this yet of the 60 or 70 within the community, only 2 guys didn't seem to be able to comprehend the wording and therefore, it did not affect them.
TorinA (Colorado)
Posts: 8
Posted:
Maintenance men giving approvals, 18 year old vehicles still running, man, this one is like out of the Twilight Zone. I'd say listen to RogerB on this, everything he said is correct as far as I know. But if not, go for the Sprinter....
DJ1 (Ontario)
Posts: 798
Posted:
MicheleD, If had a choice to live in your HOA vs the one I am surrounded by, I'd pick yours then because EVERYTHING except the interior of the home needs to be approved here...of course one of the versions of the CCR's even prohibited reflective film on the interior of the windows.

Quote:
Posted By MicheleD on 12/12/2007 3:12 PM
DJ1:

He didn't need to submit a request to alter the height or even the color of his garage door. (I believe he also painted it.)

Our CC&Rs don't require approval of those types of changes unless they are going to change the footprint of the home on the lot. (I.e., a deck, a patio, a shed, an in-ground pool, a fence, a pond, etc.)

Jan:

Our CC&Rs would not classify the Sprinter as either an RV OR a commercial vehicle. The only time it would fall into the commercial vehicle category is if: 1) they applied lettering/signage to the exterior or windows, or 2) if they attached ladder racks and/or PVC pipe carriers to the roof.

Otherwise, it's not an issue.


MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Yeah, I don't think I could live in one too restrictive.

We read the CC&Rs very carefully before we moved in. It was a new subdivision in a part of town that historically was considered "blue collar" and which never really had any "restrictions" before.

We think they are pretty fair and not too intrusive/restrictive beyond what will maintain our property values. We were tired of living on streets where people could literally hang engine blocks from trees and work on a variety of old cars as a "hobby."

But if you ask some of the people who manage to violate what moderate restrictions we have, you would think we are asking them to check with us every time they need to use the bathroom!

JanM (Texas)
Posts: 142
Posted:
I also live a pretty lax HOA. We're in rural TX so just about everyone has a PU truck, some even has 18-wheelers (minus the trailer of course), along with RVs, boats, golf carts and motorcycles. The people who owns these things always have a covered or enclosed space to put them so it never looks "trashy". We don't have to get permission to paint, landscape (unless it interfers with drainage) tree removal, yard art, doors, windows, etc. We can post signs, flags on a pole, Christmas deco, including all holidays. We can put up any kind of fence as long as it is new material. The only thing that has to be built with wood only are sheds. Existing metal sheds have been grandfathered in. I have seen some of the stricter HOAs in Houston and Ft. Worth and you could not pay me to live there. Sometimes when I read the posts here, I am glad I live in the HOA I do and I complain a lot less than I used to.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here