💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

PatJ1 (North Carolina)
Posts: 568
Posted:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2022/07/09/hoa-ducks-foreclosure/

Partial:

A Texas couple has put their house up for sale after their homeowners’ association sued and threatened to foreclose on their home.

Their offense, according to the suit: feeding the ducks that roam their subdivision outside Houston.

Kathleen Rowe, 65, and her husband George moved into the home across from a waterway in Cypress, Tex., about a decade ago, soon after their only child died. She found feeding the ducks therapeutic and has continued ever since, according to their attorney, Richard Weaver.

In June, the Lakeland Community Homeowners Association decided it had had enough of the Rowes feeding the waterfowl despite what it said were repeated warnings not to. The association filed suit against the couple in Harris County Civil Court, asking a judge for a “permanent mandatory injunction requiring Defendants to cease from feeding any wildlife” in the neighborhood and up to $250,000 in damages, Texas’s standard minimum for such lawsuits.

Feeding the ducks “runs afoul of the general plan and scheme of Subdivision” and has caused “imminent harm and irreparable injury to the Plaintiff,” the lawsuit reads. The lawsuit asks the court for permission for the HOA to foreclose on the property if the Rowes continue to feed the ducks.

An attorney for the homeowners’ association did not respond to requests for comment Saturday.

Weaver said this litigation stands out among the others he’s defended against.

“I’m a board-certified real estate attorney, and this lawsuit is truly the silliest lawsuit I’ve ever seen in my practice,” Weaver said. “This attorney has essentially claimed that feeding ducks is either noxious or offensive — I think that’s an incredible statement.”

The lawsuit accuses the Rowes of violating four HOA rules, including one prohibiting “any noxious or offensive activity” that could disturb other residents, and another barring any activity that may “materially disturb or destroy” wildlife in the community.

BillH10 (Texas)
Posts: 1,217
Posted:
There has been extensive press coverage in this in Texas publications, probably more so in an around Houston than here in north Texas/DFW. See what you can find on Google.

Of course the HOA is the bad guy, the old folks were just feeding the ducks. What is not addressed is the incredible mess a flock of ducks can make. They were asked to stop feeding the ducks, more than once.

I'm really puzzled about this story. An HOA in Texas can foreclose but only for unpaid assessments. It cannot foreclose for unpaid fines.

So, the HOA possibility of foreclosure not a result of compliance violations for feeding the ducks.
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
I read the story and it said the monetary relief MAXIMUM award wouldn't exceed $250K, so the headline was misleading. Unfortunately, most folks won't read past the second paragraph to see the details Bill mentioned.

Yet another example of a passing contest- these homeowners seem to think laws apply to everyone except them, while the board seems to be in a "we are the board and therefore we are" mode. I would have sued these people two years ago and maybe this would have been over with.

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
LisaB21 (Texas)
Posts: 97
Posted:
The headline and newspaper reporting by the Houston Chronicle was an example of what is wrong with journalism often. The story was full of inaccuracies and slanted to make the HOA look bad and the homeowner look like a victim that is being forced to sell their home at the threat of $250K lawsuit. Not the case at all. You can not foreclose on a home in Texas for Deed Restriction violations and the monetary judgement is "not to exceed $250,00". Big difference.
LetA (Nevada)
Posts: 2,679
Posted:
I really wish the press was required by law to publish the truth.
MaxB4
Posts: 3,513
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LetA on 07/10/2022 9:15 PM
I really wish the press was required by law to publish the truth.

Like requiring politicians to tell the truth?
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LetA on 07/10/2022 9:15 PM
I really wish the press was required by law to publish the truth.

As my father used to say there are three sides to a story, yours, mine and the truth. The problem lies in finding out what the truth really is - and even then, something may happen yo turn the whole thing on its head.

This is why it's important to get your information from a variety of sources and be willing to dig for the details. Sadly, too many people are lazy and don't have any critical thinking skills.

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
JohnT38 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,631
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ThadC2 on 07/11/2022 11:18 AM
proof that this group is totally biased and power hungry. all of the replies throw shade on the homeowners and support the corrup HOA. $250K for feeding ducks that poop? ducks dont' poop on sidewalks like geese do, so give me a break Bill.



another HOA story of a corrup HOA board. I could post hundreds of these stories, they happen all the time!

Blah, blah, blah...
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnT38 on 07/11/2022 11:23 AM
Posted By ThadC2 on 07/11/2022 11:18 AM
proof that this group is totally biased and power hungry. all of the replies throw shade on the homeowners and support the corrup HOA. $250K for feeding ducks that poop? ducks dont' poop on sidewalks like geese do, so give me a break Bill.



another HOA story of a corrup HOA board. I could post hundreds of these stories, they happen all the time!


Blah, blah, blah...

Yup!
Thad, since it seems you're not impressed with any connective suggestions about HOA life anywhere, why, pray, are you even here? (Other than showing off your skills in posting photos and different fonts in color.....)

By the way, feeding wildlife of any kind isn't recommended for a number of reasons besides the poop. They can turn and attack you, especially if they have young with them, they lose their migratory instincts and hang around all year waiting for a human to feed them, which can lead to them getting eaten by dogs and cats (stray and otherwise) - and a few ducks, geese, possums or whatever can lead to even more critters and soon you have even bigger problems than the poop.

And unless you're following them all day and can testify where ducks take a dump, they're just as capable as geese at pooping on the sidewalks and everywhere else. If YOU don't mind all manner of poo in your yard, do what you lije, but I'm not sure your neighbors will appreciate the noise, smell and other stuff.

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
I don't see where the HOA was foreclosing? They are bringing a lawsuit against the couple. It just requires to meet a certain money range to go to that type of court case the HOA wants to file. It's like Small Claims court here it has to be less than 5K. Cases more than 5K are not considered "small claims" and go to a higher court. Each state is different on what is the minimum.

When I was visiting Wyoming many years ago, there was someone being sued by the city for feeding the Deer. It got to be a situation where people would drive to visit the person's house to watch/participate in the feeding. The parking was along the road way causing traffic issues. The Deer were actually in danger for the routine feedings. Why? When this person moved or died, they were now dependent on this food source. It also promoted 'mating" which they were already trying to reduce the number of deer.

So to think "Oh feeding ducks/geese is harmless" it isn't. Where I work they are protected. However, I have tried to feed them and been bitten. They also sometimes attack if you get too close. They lay their eggs in the parking lot. So we have to avoid the nesting geese for weeks. Which then eats up multiple parking spaces.

I can see where the HOA feels they have to enforce the issue. Do not think they really want to do it at such a high cost. However, due to the nature of what is going on, they may have no choice.

Former HOA President

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here