MichaelT21 (Arkansas)
Posts: 501
Posts: 501
Posted:
As some of you know, I do most of the work on the Board. My experience is what others say they will do, doesn't happen. It's important to me that our HOA is run well and that the decisions that we decide at meetings are carried out.
With that said, I'm not on the Board to babysit the other Board members. They either need to follow through with what they say, or not volunteer to take a task on. I don't sit around and remind them of upcoming deadlines and prod them to complete what they already agreed to do.
This morning, I went to remind everyone of our upcoming meeting and send out the pre-meeting packet like I do each month. I noticed that the meeting minutes from the previous meeting had not been distributed by the Secretary. I mentioned in my e-mail to the Board that we don't have meeting minutes to review and I was disappointed they didn't get done. This resulted in the prompt resignation of the Secretary. The then-Secretary told me I could have discussed my concern privately with just her.
I guess my question is: Was it wrong to point out in front of the Board as a whole that we did not have meeting minutes to review? Or was she wrong for not creating meeting minutes as agreed upon when she agreed to take on the Secretary role.
Since we're a Board, I believe we all need to know of each others non-performance issues. It's up to us as a Board to decide if any officer should continue to serve in their role. Thus, I see no reason to hide the fact (from the Board as a whole) that one Board member is derelict in their duties.
Your comments?
With that said, I'm not on the Board to babysit the other Board members. They either need to follow through with what they say, or not volunteer to take a task on. I don't sit around and remind them of upcoming deadlines and prod them to complete what they already agreed to do.
This morning, I went to remind everyone of our upcoming meeting and send out the pre-meeting packet like I do each month. I noticed that the meeting minutes from the previous meeting had not been distributed by the Secretary. I mentioned in my e-mail to the Board that we don't have meeting minutes to review and I was disappointed they didn't get done. This resulted in the prompt resignation of the Secretary. The then-Secretary told me I could have discussed my concern privately with just her.
I guess my question is: Was it wrong to point out in front of the Board as a whole that we did not have meeting minutes to review? Or was she wrong for not creating meeting minutes as agreed upon when she agreed to take on the Secretary role.
Since we're a Board, I believe we all need to know of each others non-performance issues. It's up to us as a Board to decide if any officer should continue to serve in their role. Thus, I see no reason to hide the fact (from the Board as a whole) that one Board member is derelict in their duties.
Your comments?