Quote:
Posted By SheliaH on 05/21/2022 9:49 AM
And you know this because you've contacted EVERY law firm in the country who does collections and have seen all of them in action? Yeah, right. Let's just agreed to disagree - it's what grown folks do and Justin can run with sone, none all all of what's said here or any conversation on this website
It's true some people don't read - that's why it's so easy to fool and rip them off. Hiwever, I find its better to let people know up front what's coming if they try me - let's have THEM explain to the judge why they blew off the letters from the management company before the account went to the attorney and didn't read the annual letter with the upcoming years budget and the new assessment. By the way, that letter also includes a coupon book and envelopes to mail the check (unless they pay online or have a setup with their bank to automatically send the money at a specific time - that's how I pay my assessments.)
The attorneys fee schedule is for the board so We can evaluate how much legal action will cost do we can gauge that against what's owed, but if homeowners wanted to see it, they could because it's part of the association records they're entitled to see. If course, that doesn't include reviewing a neighbor's account, but they can have an its see accounting of their own.
The owner's payment history comes into play because it we've done this before, we may be inclined to skip the nastygram and go straight to court. If we find there is a tax lien, we may have to do something else, and at some point we may have no choice but to write off the debt if the cost of what's owed doesn't justify. There is a thing called throwing away good money after bad - you've heard of that, yes?
When I was board treasurer, I took no pleasure in taking legal action against homeowners, but homeowners are business partners with each other in a HOA. The board has the duty to make sure everyone pays their fair share and I would discuss every possible option to see what would work quickly and at a reasonable cost.
If a collection agency can do what we couldn't, great, but I never found one that wouldn't charge upfront costs of the was something we could live eith. If you've found such an agency, good for you. But I will never apologize for letting homeowners know what the board is doing and why, and how much it will cost them (they pay assessments too, remember?). You go ahead and do you, whatever that is.
Shelia,
I've never claimed to be omnipotent. There's little need to argue about having experience with *EVERY* law firm. Competency is rarely measured in absolutes.
In Washington State, there's no "skipping the nastygram and going straight to court." Our legislature fixed this last year by providing a very specific notice process for collections. I can only hope that other states do the same. Collection agencies are generally quite good at one thing. Law firms simply are, in general terms, not as capable at collections until it comes time to file a foreclosure lawsuit when an attorney needs to take over.
For anyone interested, here's a search with some relevant results: https://www.bing.com/search?q=association%20collections&qs=ds&form=QBRE
Regards,
Steve