Quote:
Posted By BarbaraT1 on 05/16/2022 12:26 PM
It's a pretty aggressive statement. I had an election once where one of the candidates turned in a 17 point manifesto with all kind of promises, including dissolving the association entirely. It was included in the election packet and he won a seat.... then resigned less than a month later when he realized he couldn't fulfill any of his promises without votes from the other board members or the membership.
The last election I conducted had three candidates who openly campaigned on firing me (nothing personal, just to save money) and I had to stand there and smile while they explained how useless I am. None of them won, but two of them apologized to me afterward, citing heat of the campaign. One of them even acknowledged that once they had a thorough understanding of what I do, they realized I was not a waste of money at all. Which was nice but damage was done that cannot be undone.
I caution board candidates not to set up the board as the enemy, because that sentiment won't go away when individual board members do.
I agree with this. How do you plan to get this done, especially if you are a minority voice on the board? Also, you have ~10 "focus" items. None of what you wrote is bad, but you might consider splitting it into ideals/things you'll advocate for, and concrete actions you alone can take.
What is the controversy about duck nesting, and can you bring a proposal to address it? If it is just a difference of opinion between members/board, will you conduct a community survey (and ensure a wide sample size is taken) and show the remaining members of the board that the community is in support of duck nesting? Or if there is some reason ducks are a nuisance, will you bring a solution?
Legal expenditures are tough, and not being part of the executive sessions where they are discussed, it is hard to know if they are needed to protect the community. But, you could say that you will advocate for all other possible steps to resolve disputes, prior to voting for legal action. you will be required to act as a fiduciary, and work for the best interest of the association. Sometimes that does involve litigation, sometimes it doesn't.
What specifically are you going to do to promote an inclusive community? Starting out with a low-key attack on the board's current action is actually likely to incite more drama and division. You can have more power from within. You can say that you were bring forward a proposal to do X, or you will vote for things that align with Y. Just stating things that you value is not very compelling to an informed voter. (but, most voters won't be informed, so maybe this will work. It just goes against your statement of minimizing drama and creating inclusivity)