Quote:
Posted By AdamL1 on 04/13/2022 3:56 PM
I don't think the ACC can just approve something that violates the CCR's unless a variance is issued.
The only time "variance" might be appropriate to use in a HOA/COA context is if an owner has a situation where his/her lot must, by any reasonable standard (or possibly building codes), have xyz to be functional as a home but the CC&Rs disallow xyz.
Too many boards abuse the word "variance," thinking they are all-powerful and not beholden to the CCRs. They think they can grant a variance any time they feel like it. So-called "variances" are warranted only in the most extreme circumstances of necessity, with physical constraints being a real problem.
Another way to put this: If a HOA Board grants a variance to Owner Bennet to allow xyz, and denies xyz to owner Darcy, the HOA Board needs to have a reason for this seeming "selective enforcement" that will hold up in court. Said reason being that Owner Bennet's lot will not, say, properly drain of water without allowing xyz. A real physical problem exists that justifies Bennet having xyz but not Darcy.
I believe "variance" has far more applicability in the world of city and county land use departments.