πŸ’¬ Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account β†’

⚑ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

WaltH1 (North Carolina)
Posts: 104
Posted:
A lot of us know that suing our HOA is like suing ourselves.

My question here is does anyone have any experience, knowledge, case law, or know any attorneys in North Carolina that handle suite aimed at an HOA's D & O insurance?
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
No. But I will point out that your CC&Rs probably will require the association to carry D&O insurance. And if you don't carry it, nobody in their right mind will serve on the board, and then hi-ho hi-ho, it's off to receivership you go (where you will get an extremely painful lesson).
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Why would you aim it at the insurance? A lawsuit works more like an "insurance claim" once the court rules in favor or not in favor of their client. If you read the fine print of your insurance policy you may find that payout is not what you think it is. Our required million dollar policy only paid out $80K if we were to get sued max. The rest of the money was for the legal expenses and process cost. So if someone did sue for a million dollars they would only see insurance payout after the HOA deductible of 80K. The rest of the money would have to be made up by the homeowners.

Also the HOA insurance may drop the HOA for having the lawsuit. They may pay out the claim, but doesn't mean they won't raise costs. The damage of a lawsuit effects loan offering and refinance rates. FHA and other government type loans use a HUD form which this is reported. They see lawsuit, large lien, or rent rate they could balk from offering those type loans. Banks will raise those whom want to refinance.

There are more than meets the eye on the long term effects of a lawsuit in a HOA. Does not mean it doesn't need to happen. There are cases that are fully justified. Just realize there is more of a cost to them that have to look at.

Former HOA President
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
The posting rules don't allow naming specific communities or vendors, so full have to go to your local bar association for a referral. On another conversation, you ask if there was an inexpensive option - depending on the issues, there may not be any so you need to decide if going this route is really necessary. You can askthat your legal costs be rewarded to You if you win

Others have asked who you want to sue, so that needs to be answered first. I don't think individual homeowners can file a claim against the D&O insurance anyway - you would file your lawsuit and if you win or there's a settlement, the policy would kick in.

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By SheliaH on 02/27/2022 9:43 AM
The posting rules don't allow naming specific communities or vendors, so full have to go to your local bar association for a referral. On another conversation, you ask if there was an inexpensive option - depending on the issues, there may not be any so you need to decide if going this route is really necessary. You can askthat your legal costs be rewarded to You if you win

Others have asked who you want to sue, so that needs to be answered first. I don't think individual homeowners can file a claim against the D&O insurance anyway - you would file your lawsuit and if you win or there's a settlement, the policy would kick in.

Sheila is correct. The part in bold is a common misperception about the purpose of D&O insurance. It exists to protect directors and officers of corporations for actions taken in good faith while performing their duties for the corporation. It does not protect shareholder/homeowner interests except maybe indirectly.

I also agree with Sheila that "inexpensive" and "lawsuit" don't belong in the same sentence. A lawsuit is a way to maximize expenses, time spent, and aggravation while producing lasting damage to the HOA but without guaranteeing the outcome. It's a last resort for people who can't resolve their issues any other way. (The lawyers will get paid, though.)
WaltH1 (North Carolina)
Posts: 104
Posted:
Our D & O is a million.
WaltH1 (North Carolina)
Posts: 104
Posted:
This is why I love this site, Melissa! Your valuable info would be hard to find by just Googling.

The idea of a suit goes more toward paying legal cost, if we win. If there was any money left over, I'd be inclined to put it toward a Special Reserve, which we've never had.

So, with the pitfalls of suing, any ideas on how one goes after a corrupt Board? Voting them out is not as easy as it seems. What I wouldn't give for a fair, just, inexpensive way to successfully go after an errant Board.

SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
So, with the pitfalls of suing, any ideas on how one goes after a corrupt Board? Voting them out is not as easy as it seems.



You go after a corrupt board by holding meetings and talking with every homeowner and voting them out. If you sue and win, they can still continue to be a board member. Loosing a lawsuit does not remove them from office.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
I agree voting out a bad board is not easy.Steve is on target with some of th activities owners must undertake to throw the bums out. It takes a lot of united effort by Owners. But it can work. the trouble is, too many owners who want a change try to go it alone. That never works.
WaltH1 (North Carolina)
Posts: 104
Posted:
See response to Cathy, Shelia.
LaskaS (Texas)
Posts: 1,025
Posted:
Wah,, the d&o insurance covers the costs to defend the directors and officers. It usually doesn't cover any settlement.

That is how our policy works. After Harvey, everyone grabbed on to the idea about suing to recover from the d&o policy.

Unfortunately, it was soon discovered our policy is similar to what Mellissa says..

80,000 max payout per incident and only if the courts find gross negligence or willfully wrongdoing and you would have to show that the damages hurt you financially.(I'm saying all this understanding there are some caveats, for example outright theft of funds by an employee or officer is usually covered)
WaltH1 (North Carolina)
Posts: 104
Posted:
Thank you Cathy & Sheila for your time and effort to help me!

Sorry I wasn't clear. I would be suing the Board for breech of fiduciary duty, which, theoretically would kick in their D&O insurance, and not risk the burden falling to me and my fellow homeowners.

If there is a better way to accomplish the mission, I'm all for it. Augustin was nice enough to look up and post a link to the NC Statute regarding mediation and I'm not holding my breath, but I'll try that before any litigation.

There seems to be no other way than a successful law suit to deal with a dishonest BOD, and I'm pretty sure the Board knows this and it's probably one of the reason they are so fearless and arrogant. They know that without a law suit, they're basically untouchable.

North Carolina has some of the weakest statutes on HOA's in the country. We have zero reserve requirements. I'd love to know if California's Davis-Sterling Act is helping or hurting HOA's.

A footnote for NC and maybe other states:

If my HOA election last year was a NC city or county election, it would rise to the level of criminal activity, so why isn't our HOA election covered by NC criminal laws? Depending on the offense, North Carolinians have criminal and civil avenues they can pursue, but not HOA's. To me, North Carolina has relegated its 2.6 million HOA members to 2nd class citizens by not applying criminal laws equally.

Thanks again Cathy & Sheila for your help.
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
I looked at your other conversation on the board's moving around the number of board members and expiration of terms - a major power grab to be sure, but is it criminal? That may be a helluva stretch - and you'd have to prove it beyond a reasonable level.

The bigger issue here is why the rest of the homeowners have let this go on - if they refuse to stand up and say enough, the only thing the lawsuit will do is make the attorneys (all of them) rich. I'm not saying it won't take one or the threat of it to bring them to heel, but the best way to address this would be to - rally together your neighbors and recall the entire lot sin e voting them out may prove difficult.

You say they're violating the documents, so you will need to know them forwards and backwards to make this work. You should also be prepared to show how the power grab is messing up the community. Are reserves being properly funded according to the reserve study? If there isn't one or years since the last one, why hasn't the board commission one - haven't they learned anything from Surfside? Are delinquencies say up, but nothing's being done to pursue them? Have services been non-existent?

That's the type of stuff that people are inclined to pay attention to, especially if the board doesn't address it or refuses to - and then try to silence anyone who objects. This is also why you can't do this alone. Not only will you need the help of like-minded people, you also need to have a space of people ready to step up and take the place of this board - yes, that may include you.

This is a lot of work and will start some drama, but lawsuits are expensive and move at the speed of a glacier. If you can get some help from the state, perhaps the consumer protection agency, do it. Meanwhile keep going to those meeting and speak your truth. Good luck whatever you do.


If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
I agree with others that breach of fiduciary duty can be hard to prove - not to mention time consuming and expensive as heck, assessments will rise to pay the legal costs of litigation, your insurer may jack up your rates or even dump the association as a client (increasing assessments at a minimum), and you may find yourself the community pariah for bringing all of this financial woe to the community. Oh, and prepare for a counter-suit if you go this route.

The easier and cheaper route by far is to band together with like-minded neighbors and get yourselves elected to the board. Board members serve at the pleasure of the homeowners and can be removed with or without cause. You don't have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the current directors are bad actors, although you should be sure of your facts if you want allies among your neighbors.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Okay and your point is? Honestly it is a case of not seeing the Forrest for the trees here. What purpose does this serve to make this happen? A HOA is usually run by the will of the people and what it can afford. Board members are VOLUNTEER. They do not get paid and it is a thankless job for the most part.

So are you wanting to run for a board position? If not, then why the battle? No one asked for a "hero". They are asking for the job to get done.

Step up or step out of the way. Throwing stones helps no one.

Former HOA President
WaltH1 (North Carolina)
Posts: 104
Posted:

I confess, I'm getting less and less interested in going after the D&O. I'll be reading the fine print as I was advised. The primary purpose of the whole law suit exercise would be, if we win, to pay for our legal expenses, get injunctive relief for all their lawlessness, and get rid of them.

I'm not including the horrendous job they're doing for us. My understanding is that stupid mistakes, stupid decisions, and lousy management are all covered by what I call the Stupid rule, or the Business Judgement Rule, allowing Boards to be Stupid.

All my evidence has to to with willful wrong doing.
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
Words like "stupid" 'and "horrendous" can be subjective - you may be right, but what do you plan to do about the homeowners (and there could be a lot of them) who feel the board is doing a fabulous job? Or the ones that really don't give a damn, as long as they get the services provided and their assessments aren't too high (whatever that means - it's also subjective). If you want this board gone, you'll have to explain to everyone what the problems are, and you need to do it without the explosive language.

Once again I ask - instead of a lawsuit, why notget together with the rest of the homeowners and push for a recall? If these folks are as bad as you say, I suspect others feel as you do, so it's a matter of finding who they are, coming up with a plan, and then providing your findings to your neighbors. If the board doesn't have a plausible explanation for this (and I don't see one for changing up the expiration dates of one's term), they should be sacked, but you'll have to do the hard work of convincing everyone.

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
WaltH1 (North Carolina)
Posts: 104
Posted:

Again, Sheila, I can't begin to thank you and some of the others enough for your experience and guidance. I could spend weeks Googling this stuff and I'd come up with nothing, because it's not there.

If withholding legitimate openings by municipalities, to be voted on, say county commissioner or city council seats, suddenly saying we're not going to fill these seats, would definitely rise to the level of North Carolina's election laws violations, Chapter 163. I've filed criminal complaints with the county DA, State Attorney General, State Elections Board, and the Secretary of State. My responses were anything from none, to it's not our jurisdiction, to denial the statue covers HOA.

The Secretary of State was an amusing adventure. They have a complaint form for violations of 55A, the NC Not for Profit Act. No penalties available, but supposedly they and send out interrogatories to wayward corporations. Our Board refuses to share the names and addresses of fellow homeowners, a clear violation of the Act. After trying for several months, I finally talked with the Counsel for the Secretary of State and she was surprisingly candid. She said the Attorney General had told them not of send out interrogatories. She further said she did not even know how to write the interrogatory, and if she did, it would be 18 months before it was acted on. This was a dual purpose exercise to exhaust all avenues state-wise, regarding our HOA, and to prove a point to myself that North Carolina treats it's 2.6 million HOA owners as second class citizens.

We are a vacation condominium, a second home to most owners, and increasingly, Air B&B investments. This compounds our problem as some owners don't care, others just sell their units when they get mad. Over the last few years we have formed a group just called Concerned Homeowners. We were just about gutted last year by fleeing owners. We're just about back to the magic number, 20% of our 88 units, enough to call for a Special meeting. I'm leaning toward yours and others advice, of rallying owners, by setting up Zoom meeting around April, hopefully on a monthly basis.

My first year on this project, I was startled to find out we have no Special Reserve, have never had a reserve study, and the Board wants us to believe any leftovers from a Special Assessments can be applied to other projects. There is no evidence that that and so many other thing were ever approved by the owners. In a rare moment of honesty, in August of 2020, they quipped in a newsletter that "pay as you go," wasn't working. No kidding! They subscribe to none of the national organizations that support HOA's. From Board to Board, they do the same things they've always done, right or wrong, blame the previous Boards for mismanagement, call it a day, and go home.

The last time any owner inspired items made it on the annual agenda was 2018, when they had to call a Special Meeting to correct stupid mistakes I had pointed out. Since then meetings are tightly controlled allowing 5 minutes for each owner that wants to speak, no agenda items, and they have an armed guard (local police) in the back, to assure a peaceful meeting. I've railed against that too. In my 6 years we've have never had any altercations. Some owners get upset, but never violent. The guard is totally unnecessary and, I believe, designed to intimidate the homeowners.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
So you did figure out there isn't a way around the "Suing your HOA is suing yourself and your neighbors?". Like it or not it is a FACT. Even going after the HOA insurance (which you can't) still going to pay and put losing insurance at risk. Yes, the insurance company will drop a HOA like a hot potato and/or raise their rates.

For someone who has all these complaints and says everyone is doing thing "wrong", your not mentioned putting your name in the hat for the board. Why is that? Rather control things from the outside than in?

I suspect many of us would be behind 100% if you said you were doing this to get on the board. Which is the position you need to make the changes you want. Most of us "seasoned" board members that is what we did. No lawsuits. Just followed the rules and ran for the office. If you have the people you say supporting you, then you should have the votes to get there. If not, then you may not have the problems you think you have.

Former HOA President
WaltH1 (North Carolina)
Posts: 104
Posted:
Somebody got up on the wrong side today....]

Board members are volunteers in a thankless job. Some wear that Volunteer like a chip on their shoulder that elevates them above their fellow homeowners. Some of these use their volunteering as an excuse not to follow the rules and do what they know is right.

You would fit right in with our Board.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Well apparently you would rather keep making their job thankless and use them as punching bags. Some of us get up in the morning and put our suspenders. Others keep their pants around their ankles and whine they can't keep their pants up.

Former HOA President
JohnT38 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,631
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 02/28/2022 4:33 PM
Well apparently you would rather keep making their job thankless and use them as punching bags. Some of us get up in the morning and put our suspenders. Others keep their pants around their ankles and whine they can't keep their pants up.

For someone who is notorious for spreading false and factually incorrect information and made up sh*t you are simply too much.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Really? Was there something that Walt has said that didn't scream "Ankle Biter"? If so smart, then why not doing the job or let the people doing it do it? If your not willing to walk a mile in someone's shoes, the least you can do is clear a path.

Former HOA President
AugustinD
Posts: 3,698
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By WaltH1 on 02/28/2022 3:04 PM

The Secretary of State was an amusing adventure. They have a complaint form for violations of 55A, the NC Not for Profit Act. No penalties available, but supposedly they and send out interrogatories to wayward corporations. Our Board refuses to share the names and addresses of fellow homeowners, a clear violation of the Act. After trying for several months, I finally talked with the Counsel for the Secretary of State and she was surprisingly candid. She said the Attorney General had told them not of send out interrogatories. She further said she did not even know how to write the interrogatory, and if she did, it would be 18 months before it was acted on. This was a dual purpose exercise to exhaust all avenues state-wise, regarding our HOA, and to prove a point to myself that North Carolina treats it's 2.6 million HOA owners as second class citizens.
Have you considered why the NC Secretary of State is not enforcing the law?

It took over 35 years of adulthood for me to realize that much of the law is not enforced; that there are nowhere near enough public defenders to ensure low income folks get the due process to which they are entitled (so they rot in prison, taking on new addictions, facing rape, and more); that many horrible, tortious situations cannot be addressed because middle class Joe cannot afford an attorney; that the IRS could give a flying fig about enforcing many of its rules, on account of it does not have the budget to do so; that city land use departments should be re-named "City Let-Me-Help-A-Developer-Break-the-Law Departments" (said aiding and abetting of lawbreaking being blessed routinely by their respective city councils); that national parks will fall apart and even burn when there are not enough rangers to keep an eye on things; more.

You call these realities "an amusing adventure."

I call them a part of growing up in the United States.
WaltH1 (North Carolina)
Posts: 104
Posted:

Those are the top questions, Shelia. The ones thinking the Board does a wonderful are lost causes, and they can be found in most organizations. the ones that don't care haunt me more than anything. Being a vacation condo where most units are 2nd homes increases the possibility of don't care, maybe because "out of sight, out of mind," or the recent rash of investors, some may not care. I'm not as concerned that the investors might not care because they want their investment to be attractive to tourist, and last year they paid the highest prices in years for their units.

The law suit is back burner. I'm going to focus on yours and other suggestions: the other homeowners. It came to me the other night to try to get a monthly Zoom meeting going, focusing on our Concerned Homeowners and what they want and don't want from our Board. If the recent snow dump or special assessments, they may not like what they hear. We very rarely get a 20+" snowfall. It paralyzed the mountain. With Special Assessments, we're paying what we should be paying and probably will for a long time. This and previous Boards have used the pay as you go system and it has cost us dearly. I've been aligned with 2 good and 2 bad HOA's over the years and have 20 year in real estate. It's my opinion that Special Assessments are red flags unless they're dealing with something unforeseen. The well run HOA's have Special Reserves for and only for big time renovations.

OH, for the record, I am pro HOA's. When I was showing property, some of my customers were anti-Hoa, so I would be sure to drive them by the house painted Purple & Gold, that was not in a HOA.
WaltH1 (North Carolina)
Posts: 104
Posted:

Thank you for your input, Melissa. Maybe we should agree to disagree? I think I have answered all of you questions and we have covered all of my issues. In the words of my BOB, any further conversation between us is "closed."
WaltH1 (North Carolina)
Posts: 104
Posted:

Thank you for your input, Melissa. Maybe we should agree to disagree? I think I have answered all of you questions and we have covered all of my issues. In the words of my BOB, any further conversation between us is "closed."
WaltH1 (North Carolina)
Posts: 104
Posted:

If I had to guess why the Sec. of State wouldn't enforce the law, I would say politics.

I didn't see anything in your comment that struck me as untrue. Sad. And as you put it, reality.
AugustinD
Posts: 3,698
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By WaltH1 on 03/01/2022 7:22 AM

If I had to guess why the Sec. of State wouldn't enforce the law, I would say politics.
I would say lack of funds, forcing the Sec State to prioritize where money is spent.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
What reality? How dare you put that here Augustine! Why next you may say that thinking you are smarter than everyone in the room means no one else is doing their jobs...

Former HOA President
AugustinD
Posts: 3,698
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 03/01/2022 7:53 AM
What reality? How dare you put that here Augustine!
Sitting here as a senior citizen, I am humbled and consider myself naΓ―ve (or just raised weirdly) for accepting only relatively recently what the character Dave Stohler said so well in the 1979 film "Breaking Away":

Everybody cheats, Dad. I just didn't know.

These days I try to pick my battles. Maybe this is just like the North Carolina Secretary of State.
WaltH1 (North Carolina)
Posts: 104
Posted:

You know that could be Augustin. I have heard the whole state government is streched (sp) to the limit!
JoeD14 (Washington)
Posts: 14
Posted:
Just found this website,, Our HOA is in the middle of a few lawsuits. It's amazing that adults can bicker like grade school kids. The goal of the person filing most of the lawsuits , is to put the lake into receivership. He has even admitted this.

SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
Wonder if he understands what receivership will do to his wallet, not to mention the oh, so important property values people continue to howl about? Or he's trying to figure out a way to get named receiver so he can do whatever he wants and make money doing it (some people have no shame in how money's made as long as they're the ones who make it).

Maybe someone should find a way to make this guy admit in open court why he wants receivership - it would be interesting to hear how the judge responds to that. Then again, I wonder about some of THEM.......

Good luck to you and your neighbors.

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
JoeD14 (Washington)
Posts: 14
Posted:
I think we could write a book about this HOA. At least a good TV show. One lawsuit was shot down,, then appealed, and then the appeal was shot down. This time the judge awarded all court cost. The HOA will recover cost. Too much still outstanding to comment on publicly

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • βœ“ Ask follow-up questions
  • βœ“ Share your experience
  • βœ“ Get expert advice
  • βœ“ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account β†’

⚑ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here