💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

LaskaS (Texas)
Posts: 1,025
Posted:
hi, I have read our documents and the texas 81 and 82.

My question is, does the association have to notify owners if they decided amongst themselves to charge for a service that has never been charged before.?

there was an water supply copper pipe that sprung a pinhole leak . The lead was only discovered when the downstairs neighbor noticed irregularities and water on the ceiling of the bathroom. The owner upstairs immediately had the repair done within a couple of hours.

In order to change out the nipple that had the pin hole leak, the water to the property had to be shut off. the leak was behind the in unit shutoff.

This was an emergency repair , the owner in the upstairs unit paid for the repair and replacement of damage inside their unit.
the downstairs neighbor paid for the drywall repair in their unit.

The owner then received a notice that 70 dollars was charged to their account to temporarily turn off the water.

There is no listed fee for this service in any of our documents. The actual water cutoff policy for the association, does not state anything about a charge for the act of turning off the water.

The office manager is now saying that the board agreed a while back that there should be a charge. The owner objected and asked for documentation. There is no documentation .

I suggested to this owner that the association can not create fees for something that has always been included in our monthly maintenance fees. My argument is the board can not alter the responsibility breakdown in our declaration without a vote of the association. (all changes to the declaration require a vote of the association.

Augustine, the help you provided previously had to do with due process for fines and or damages to the property. This is just whether a charge can be created out of thin air that has never been charged before.

MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
This isn't a fee as much as asking to be reimbursed for expenses paid out?

Former HOA President
AugustinD
Posts: 3,698
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 02/04/2022 2:52 PM
This isn't a fee as much as asking to be reimbursed for expenses paid out?
LaskaS, I tend to see it the way MelissaP1 sees it. She did end her comment with a question mark, which is a good point. Owners should ask, "Why $70? Was a plumber called to shut off the water? Did the city charge this? Was a check written to pay a vendor to shut off the water? Did an employee of the association get up in the middle of the night and so be paid overtime to shut off water?" And so on.

Else a few other observations:

Condo associations and cities alike do not like just any Tom, Dick or Sally operating major shutoff valves. Liability reasons. A licensed plumber sometimes is the right person to do this (again, for liability reasons). I know all the old timers here, male and female alike, know what the enormous, long-handled "key" looks like to shut off the underground (in a vault) main shutoff valve for whatever.

A HOA's expenses for services can change over time, with fees being added that were not charged before. The HOA has to be reasonable and make an effort to be in compliance with the CCR. I think owners have to be reasonable and understand for example, why, in this (litigious) day and age, a COA's regular duty maintenance man should not be the one shutting the valve for a water main.

LaskaS (Texas)
Posts: 1,025
Posted:
Hi,,, we have an old system. there are two boilers that serve the hole property and water shutoff is performed by the maintenance staff.. there was not cost incurred to the association.

the property manager is claiming it took him time to turn the valves off.

I had to coordinate the shutoff ,i.e, he shut off the boiler and water and had me confirm the water in my unit was off.. same thing when he turned it back on. It took approx 10 minutes each time.

LaskaS (Texas)
Posts: 1,025
Posted:
again, this is a completely made up charge that the current property manager (board member) instituted on his own.

I'm not saying that this charge cant be implemented if the board follows the process for changing who is responsible for what. I'm saying ,no procedures or documentation exists . And I'm asking of the board even has authority to start charging owners for something that used to be included in their monthly fees.

I had an emergency repair several years ago.. I was not charged.

additionally. the association previous to harvey when we had professional management. If there was a charge incurred by work done outside of ordinary maintenance, then the owner had to sign an work order approving the fee and charges. otherwise it the property manager approve it.

If there was a fee that was secretly approved with no notification to owners, and if this is legal. Then there still would need to be a signed work order by the owner.. otherwise a property manager could charge the owners arbitrarily for whatever they felt like.

LaskaS (Texas)
Posts: 1,025
Posted:
one last explanation.. here is the text of the shutoff policy. nowhere does it state there will be charges if an repair is needed for an emergency issue.

NON-EMERGENCY PLUMBING REPAIRS
3RD WEDNESDAY OF EACH MONTH
The third Wednesday of each month is the dedicated day for Pines residents to make
any non-emergency plumbing repairs to their units. Half or the whole property could
have the water off on that day – depending on work scheduled. If you plan to schedule
plumbing repairs on the third Wednesday of the month, please follow the steps
recommended below:
Please contact the on-site office at 713.468.8412 or send e-mail to the office at
[email protected] stating that you have scheduled plumbing repairs for
your unit. Please indicate the approximate time the job will take time to complete.
If repairs are scheduled, the water will be turned off at 9:00 a.m. and will be
turned back on at 2:00 p.m. Please make arrangements with your plumber to
begin work as close at possible to the time the water will be shut off.
To avoid delays, please make sure your plumber has all the parts required for the
job.
Contact the on-site office 713.467.8412 when the plumber has completed his
work.
Non-emergency plumbing repairs can only be made during normal business
hours.
Only our maintenance staff is permitted to turn the water off.
The water will not be turned off unless repairs are scheduled.
The Association will not be responsible for any water damage to your unit or
adjoining units, personal belongings, etc. if flooding was caused due to
neglect in notifying the Association you had scheduled plumbing repairs.
Maintenance will NOT turn the water off on any other day unless there is a
plumbing emergency
AugustinD
Posts: 3,698
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LaskaS on 02/04/2022 3:13 PM
Hi,,, we have an old system. there are two boilers that serve the hole property and water shutoff is performed by the maintenance staff.. there was not cost incurred to the association.

the property manager is claiming it took him time to turn the valves off.

I had to coordinate the shutoff ,i.e, he shut off the boiler and water and had me confirm the water in my unit was off.. same thing when he turned it back on. It took approx 10 minutes each time.

If the contract with the manager allows for such a payment to the manager, then $70 for 20 minutes all together in an emergency situation does not seem out of line.

Do you think the manager should bill nothing?

I do not see why a non-emergency procedure for plumbing repairs and the accompanying water shut off should say something about charges for emergencies.

If you are still bothered by this, ask for a meeting with the board.

I wish some of the usual suspects here at HOATalk would not chime in here and give LaskaS grief. She is asking for people's impressions and help before going to her Board about this (if she goes to the Board). This is better than going straight to the Board.
AugustinD
Posts: 3,698
Posted:
LaskaS, I think your point is that there should have been advance notice of this charge, and that, if this practice goes unchecked, there is a risk the manager will try to pull sh-t in the future and rip off the COA.

This was an emergency. I am not convinced anything here was meaningfully (or at all?) out of line.
LaskaS (Texas)
Posts: 1,025
Posted:
the manager is actually a board member,, the association pays the employees . 2 maintenance and 1 office manager.

there is nothing anywhere that says there is a charge for water shutoff in emergencies.

the only reference to emergencies is that only the maintenance staff are authorized to shut if off.

again. I pay 550 a month to the association in maintenance fees.

I'm asking. if there is no documentation of any fee for water shutoff in emergencies. If there has never been a charge for an emergency shutoff that is performed in house. Can a property manger just tell the board he is going to start charging and then start charging. allwitholut any notification to owners?
the water supply line is defined by our declaration as a limited common element. the pinhole leak occurred at the nipple connection of cast iron to copper. there was no negligence.

LaskaS (Texas)
Posts: 1,025
Posted:
augustine,
the property manager is an employee of the association,,not a management company.. he is a board member that has repeatedly acted outside his authority and his actions go unchecked.

The board has been given notice that the property manager has acted outside of his authority and they chose to do nothing. They chose to not put in place any actual job requirements for him to follow.
This indifference and looking the other way is at theroot of the mismanagement of our property.

The board members literally have said,, "i don't care what the law is , in my opinion its a good idea ad I'm voting yes"

i mean,,just willful ignorance over and over.
AugustinD
Posts: 3,698
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LaskaS on 02/04/2022 3:48 PM
the manager is actually a board member,, the association pays the employees . 2 maintenance and 1 office manager.

there is nothing anywhere that says there is a charge for water shutoff in emergencies.

the only reference to emergencies is that only the maintenance staff are authorized to shut if off.

again. I pay 550 a month to the association in maintenance fees.

I'm asking. if there is no documentation of any fee for water shutoff in emergencies. If there has never been a charge for an emergency shutoff that is performed in house. Can a property manger just tell the board he is going to start charging and then start charging. allwitholut any notification to owners?
the water supply line is defined by our declaration as a limited common element. the pinhole leak occurred at the nipple connection of cast iron to copper. there was no negligence.

-- What's in the manager's contract?

-- You have every right to ask the Board about this bill from the COA. Who knows? Maybe the Board will agree with you.

-- But I think your presentation is sloppy and is going to make the directors not want to listen to the part of your concerns that have validity. E.g. just because there was no negligence does not mean an owner of a plumbing system should not have to pay for xyz to get a problem fixed.
LaskaS (Texas)
Posts: 1,025
Posted:
augustine, my point is , there has never been a charge before. I had an emergency 10 years ago that necessitated water shutoff.. nothing was charged.

I have already sent an email to the accounting company disputing the charge and cc'd the entire board.

This will result in me having to present it to the board.

what I'm concerned with, the board has repeatedly approved actions that were not authorized by our documents.

I know the legislation has put in place limitations on what a condo board can do regarding fines and fees. the due notice clause you gave me before(regarding the landscaping improvements) had to do with the ability of a board to fine or assess and owner for damages caused by their negligence...

This doesn't really fit into those categories.

I believe an argument could be made that the responsibility to turn off the water ,whether emergency or not, is the associations. Noone else is authorized to do it. Additionally, the need for repair was because of a pinhole lieak in the copper water supply lines.. defined by our bylaws as a limited common element.
LaskaS (Texas)
Posts: 1,025
Posted:
I did pay for the repair.

Because only the maintenance staff are the ones authorized to shutoff the water for emergencies and non emergencies.. I notified the property manager. He told me to contact him when the parts are here and we are ready to make the repair so he could turn off the water.. NOT TURNIG OFF THE WATER would have cause a flood of water into my unit and the downstairs unit..
LaskaS (Texas)
Posts: 1,025
Posted:
augustine, you help so many people, if i can refresh your memory. My association does not have a contract with a management company, we are self managed.

The manager is paid a salary for operations and maintenance of the common areas... the water shutoff is in a common area, the boiler is common.

I paid for the repair of the copper pipe myself, technically, the copper pipe is a limited common element. however, I'm not going to argue about that.

LaskaS (Texas)
Posts: 1,025
Posted:
Is there a requirement for the association to notify owners and document the change in our official documents if the board wants to start charging for something that has never before been charged to owners.

In 1999 the board made a resolution to the declaration and changed the ac units from association responsibility, to owner responsiblity, that required lawyers and filing with the county. etc.

Do you think the argument that creating a fee for operation of a common element(water shutoff valves_)in emergency cases is in effect changing the declaration and who is responsible for what. changes to the declaration require a vote of members of the hoa.\
if they say the board agreed to this informally at some point, That would be a violation of the requirement for all decisions of the board to be made a duly called meeting and documented in the minutes. there is no such documentation nor record of any board vote or even any mention of the topic. The property manager who is a board member said that he did mention it and the board agreed. To which I asked for the minutes that documented this; He then shut down and told me to take it up with the board. that's always the answer when he has taken action outside of of his authority.
I could have turned the water off myself. However, the water shutoff policy is clear and only maintenance can shut if off.

AugustinD
Posts: 3,698
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LaskaS on 02/04/2022 4:03 PM
[snip stuff about fines and when HOA due process procedures must be practiced by the HOA. Correct: Not relevant here except IMO as an exercise best completed while under the influence.]
I believe an argument could be made that the responsibility to turn off the water ,whether emergency or not, is the associations. Noone else is authorized to do it. Additionally, the need for repair was because of a pinhole lieak in the copper water supply lines.. defined by our bylaws as a limited common element.
You're saying owners already pay for certain maintenance performed by the HOA. You're asking: Why isn't turning off the water so an owner can make an emergency repair "maintenance"? I happen to think an emergency is not normal "maintenance." Furthermore, this task (turning off the water) served only two units at most. Usually COAs can assign expenses to less than all owners when the service that caused the expense served less than all units.

You can ask the Board to advertise this charge. I am not sure I (if I were on your Board) would support a refund to you or doing anything more. Because managers should not be at the beck and call of individual owners (much as I suspect you disagree).

I would be bearing in mind that you have long attacked this manager. I would not be 100% sure you weren't looking for something to give the manager a hard time on instead of owning that expenses incurred by less than all units shall be billed to only those units et cetera.

I do not think I can change your mind on this. It's just my opinion. The piranhas will likely arrive before midnight tonight.
AugustinD
Posts: 3,698
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LaskaS on 02/04/2022 4:17 PM

I could have turned the water off myself. However, the water shutoff policy is clear and only maintenance can shut if off.
You could have unlawfully operated a major common area item, broken it, and cost the COA a fortune.
AugustinD
Posts: 3,698
Posted:
LaskaS, as far as the CCRs are concerned, I think a COA's billing an individual owner for time the manager must take out of his or her day to serve exclusively the individual owner is not out in CC&R left field, IMO.
LaskaS (Texas)
Posts: 1,025
Posted:
Again,

the rate that is normally charged when an owner requests a something, and if there is extra time a maintenance employee has is 35 dollars an hour.

The caveat is, all work requests that are charged back to an owner must be pre approved by the owner.

The emergency shutoff did not occur right away,,,, i temporarily stopped the leak with a rubber clamp and procured the required replacement part.

I guess I was wrong, Augustine,

here is a question
are there notice requirements before an association can start charging owners for coordination the water shutoff when there is an emergency plumbing repair necessary.

Does a condominium board have a right to agree to institute a new charge that owners will incur without a duly called meeting and without any record of such agreement.

Im not asking whether charging an owner for turning of the water is a good idea.

It may or may not be a good idea to start charging owners for emergency water shut off. However. that's not my point, I'm arguing that the office manager (boar member) does not have the authority to start charging owners for something that was never charged before when there was no notification to owners nor any documentation of a board agreement .etc.
LaskaS (Texas)
Posts: 1,025
Posted:
this is is meant to be sarcastic.

Are you saying that the association can start billing owners for the time an office manager claims he took to answer a phone call from an owner.
or the time it took an office manager to send a violation notice to an owner...

i know the second one is NO it can not , unless it is expressly authorized to do so in the documents.

i.e. legal fees
AugustinD
Posts: 3,698
Posted:
-- Are you saying the HOA can never bill less than all owners for services the HOA renders to less than all owners' units?

-- I do not have any arguments that I think are particularly compelling so that you get your way here.

-- A $70 bill, at least some of which is justified since the service was to less than all owners' units, is not something I would want to spend so much time on.
LaskaS (Texas)
Posts: 1,025
Posted:
i'm saying that the documents give a board the right to change rules and regulations. IF THEY FOLLOW THE REQUIRED procedure which includes notifying owners of the new rule with at least 30 days notice before the new rule will take effect.

Any charges or fees that an association has properly decided to charge owners needs to follow the legal requirements for changes to the declaration and the responsibilities chart.

the association owns all of the copper lines and utility lines within my unit. however. I am responsible for maintenance and repair. I paid a plumber to replace the nipple, I paid a contractor to replace the drywall.

If the association governed by the board decided to start charging an owner for a simple courtesy service that has never been charged before, there are legal requirements that they must follow. AM I WRONG ON THIS.?

My argument would be that an individual property manager does not set association policy. the board does. all policy ,rules and regulations must be documented and changes must be sent to owners in advance.
LaskaS (Texas)
Posts: 1,025
Posted:
augustine, i really don't mean to try and change your mind, what I'm trying to get the answer to is, is there any statute the expressly gives a single property manager who is also a board member the authority to arbitrarily decide to start charging for something that has never been charged for before. I don't believe it exists.

I also know that all decisions of the association are made by the board at a duly called meeting. I know that any board changes to the rules and regulations governing the association must occur at a duly called meeting and notice must be sent to owners at least 30 days before the new rule takes effect.

It's not 70 dollars. it's the principal. If an individual board member can make policy for the association and dole out charges and fees for whatever actions they think there should be a charge for, that's just nonsense. That is overreaching. Owners sign a contract, there's a list of items that owners can be charged for. including dog fees, mail keys, access gate remote, extra parking space, clubhouse rental, all of those things are recorded in our documents.
AugustinD
Posts: 3,698
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LaskaS on 02/04/2022 11:42 PM
augustine, i really don't mean to try and change your mind, what I'm trying to get the answer to is, is there any statute the expressly gives a single property manager who is also a board member the authority to arbitrarily decide to start charging for something that has never been charged for before. I don't believe it exists.
You see the charge as a 'new rule' of which owners were not properly notified (a.k.a. "noticed"). I see it as the condo exercising its right under the covenants (most likely) to bill an owner for an expense attributable to less than all owners.

You want validation that this is not fair? Okay, what happened is not 100% fair. Nor is it 100% unfair IMO. Given the fact that the directors are volunteers with a duty to make sure the manager's time is not squandered, I think it's fair enough that I am not inclined to give the board grief about it other than saying, "Would you please consider noting on page 23 of the Rules that an owner needing water shut off in an emergency type situation will be billed for the manager's time and any vendor's time, pursuant to CCR such-and-such, about the association having the right to bill for an expense incurred by less than all owners? I got a surprise bill from the COA for the manager's time shutting off the water. I sure would have appreciated a heads up."

You have my opinion. I think you will lose (further?) credibility if you go a number of rounds over this with the Board when the Association would be 'not 100% wrong' to bill you for the manager's time.

MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Sorry fell down the rabbit hole Augustine... Maybe will find some carrots down there but I doubt it.

It should be pointed out that it does NOT sound like the HOA is the one charging this fee but the Management company. It was the Management company that responded. It was NOT the HOA. The MC is a separate company paid by the HOA. The MC can charge for their expense if they are incurred. Which in this case was a wake up call to handle an emergency of that person not of the HOA. The MC could have charged the HOA if they had called them. Plus even if they did call the HOA, that meant that charge would have came out of EVERYONE's pocket/dues. Does that sound fair for everyone to pay for one person's repair?

That is what you ask for when you want the HOA to pay for something. Your asking the HOA to use EVERYONE's dues money to pay for something. Not everything is something ALL members should pay for. Especially if it isn't serving a majority of people. Spending money on filing a lien benefits all the members as it is collecting money ALL members are owed. Paying for one person's plumbing repair not so much. Unless that plumbing repair involves common area/HOA property. A hole in a pipe in a unit is not the HOA. What is the HOA is if the leak is at the pipe leading up to the unit in a shared space.

So the overall answer is that this isn't wrong. The MC had the right to charge. It just should be known this is the practice when someone contacts them.

Former HOA President
AugustinD
Posts: 3,698
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 02/05/2022 6:56 AM
It should be pointed out that it does NOT sound like the HOA is the one charging this fee but the Management company.
As a matter of law, the MC is an agent of the HOA. The bill is from the HOA. (If LaskaS wants to argue about the details of the latter, then I am not interested. She should take her concerns to the Board; be prepared to be ignored; and further squander her credibility.)

You and I appear to both agree that the HOA (through the MC) has the right to bill an owner for an expense incurred as a result of service to the one owner but providing no benefit to all owners.

I will likely respond "Asked and Answered" to LaskaS in the next post. (Piranha JohnC46, restrain yourself [wink-o].) She may not be aware of it, but in my opinion she is browbeating at this point, repeating over and over something she believes without understanding that others may have a different opinion.

Being validated may provide an adrenaline kick. But the adrenaline is also a gateway drug to addiction. Better to kick the habit and accept that people can agree to disagree with civility. Or even better, one can move from a black and white position to realizing things are kinda grey. BftGGTGI (But for the grace of god and so on, there go I.)

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AugustinD on 02/04/2022 4:27 PM
LaskaS, as far as the CCRs are concerned, I think a COA's billing an individual owner for time the manager must take out of his or her day to serve exclusively the individual owner is not out in CC&R left field, IMO.

I agree.
BenA2 (Texas)
Posts: 1,273
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LaskaS on 02/04/2022 2:47 PM

My argument is the board can not alter the responsibility breakdown in our declaration without a vote of the association. (all changes to the declaration require a vote of the association.


I agree. No one (not even the government) can take your money without some legal authority. In an HOA, that authority normally comes from the CC&Rs. If the CC&Rs do not create the authority for such a fee or give the board authority to create the fee, the board cannot do it.

Someone mentioned that it might be reimbursement. If it is, in fact, a request for reimbursement for real damages (I'm not sure how this would cost the HOA money), then I would pay it, as long as they have evidence of the damages. It sounds more like a penalty to me.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BenA2 on 02/05/2022 8:57 AM
Posted By LaskaS on 02/04/2022 2:47 PM

My argument is the board can not alter the responsibility breakdown in our declaration without a vote of the association. (all changes to the declaration require a vote of the association.



I agree. No one (not even the government) can take your money without some legal authority. In an HOA, that authority normally comes from the CC&Rs. If the CC&Rs do not create the authority for such a fee or give the board authority to create the fee, the board cannot do it.

Someone mentioned that it might be reimbursement. If it is, in fact, a request for reimbursement for real damages (I'm not sure how this would cost the HOA money), then I would pay it, as long as they have evidence of the damages. It sounds more like a penalty to me.

I believe it was a fee charged by the Management Company, not the BOD, thus nothing to do with the CCR's.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Need to define "Fee". A fee is usually an upfront charge. Like $25 late fee for unpaid dues. A charge is usually discharged when services are rendered. I am not sure what is being discussed is a "Fee" as much as it is a "charge". The terms here are skewed.

Former HOA President
LaskaS (Texas)
Posts: 1,025
Posted:
WE DO NOT HAVE A MANAGEMENT COMPANY! THERE IS NO THIRD PARTY MANAGING OUR PROPERTY... THE ASSOCIATION EMPLOYS AN ONSITE MANAGER. AND 3 FULL TIME MAINTENACE WORKERS.
LaskaS (Texas)
Posts: 1,025
Posted:
AUGUSTINE, thanks for your opinion. I always want to hear other objective opinions.

LaskaS (Texas)
Posts: 1,025
Posted:
augustine, I wanted to add, the association via the board could very well decide to charge owners for any number of things. However the board has never discussed or voted on this.

turning the water off took 10 minutes.. turning it on took 10 minutes. based on that. the 70$ charge in completely arbitrary.

our property does have an option for owners to request our maintenance guys perform work them... the association charges 35 an hour. it's only available if the guys have time. And the owner must sign a work request and an agreement acknowledging that they will be charged back at the rate of 35 an hour. 30 min increments.

When i described the water leak as an emergency, that has different connotations. I was using emergency to mean, it wasn't an an owner deciding to change their faucets or something. Those elective repairs are required to be done on the 3rd Wednesday of the month.. A hole in a copper water supply is urgent and can't wait for the third Wednesday of the month.

PatJ1 (North Carolina)
Posts: 568
Posted:
If the HOA directly employs your maintenance staff, I don't see justification of a fee to the owner. Water emergencies need to be handled immediately to prevent damage to neighboring properties.

Even if an outside vendor had to be called in, it's still an emergency and a failure beyond the unit. HOA absorbs that cost also. IMO.

AugustinD
Posts: 3,698
Posted:
LaskaS, you have two veterans here whom I hold in the highest regard (BenA2 and PatJ1) seeing this more your way. Consider writing a letter as follows:

Dear Board of Directors,

I had a leak in my unit whose repair required the water to be secured briefly. The Association, through its manager, billed me $70 to turn off the water and then turn on the water. I had no advance notice of this charge. Because there was no advance notice, would you please consider removing this charge from my account? Also, and meant with the greatest respect, if the Association intends to continue to bill individual units for this service as needed, would you please consider listing this fee in the official Rules and Regulations?

name
address
email addie
phone number

Watch for editing by others here. They often improve on whatever I suggest.
LaskaS (Texas)
Posts: 1,025
Posted:
thank you all so very much.

LaskaS (Texas)
Posts: 1,025
Posted:
pat, quick clarification.

I live in a condominium, so it's a condominium association.

I hope your answer is the same.

PatJ1 (North Carolina)
Posts: 568
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By LaskaS on 02/07/2022 12:31 AM
pat, quick clarification.

I live in a condominium, so it's a condominium association.

I hope your answer is the same.


Yes, we are stacked condos, 2 high. We always hire outside vendors. HOA employed maintenance performing an emergency shut-off is part of maintaining the property. It is not outside of their maintenance duties. Even if it was after hours, it was a common property failure emergency that could cause damage to other units and common property.

If one of our owners needs the community water shut off to switch out their main valve, they pay for everything even if a separate plumber does the shut-off. (Many plumbers shy away from turning off our community water.) If the leak is before the shut-off the HOA pays for everything.

A planned shut-off is appreciated and encouraged so we can give 24 hour notice to the other 143 residents. Fortunately, so far all main valve failures happen when they try to turn the water back on and they/we can schedule the repair.

Our governing documents state that all connections servicing the unit are owner responsibility.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here