JasonS19 (Maryland)
Posts: 20
Posts: 20
Posted:
I do wish to apologize up front regarding the length of this post, it is indeed rather long so I believe presenting is in several parts would be best.
My neighborhood is governed by an HOA built within an incorporated city surrounded by village centers. Many of ones daily necessities are within walking distance, grocery stores, restaurants, post office, gas stations and the like can all be found directly across the street. And while this is extremely convenient it brings with it a substantial amount of traffic including Semi-Trucks delivering goods 24 hours a day, even during the wee hours of the morning.
To provide some perspective, the size of the intersection leading into our development has 16 separate lanes of traffic and is situated less then 100 feet from the nearest neighborhood home.
The builder of the development understood how this could negatively impact homeowners and therefore designed features to mitigate the situation. A large dirt berm was constructed running along the entire face of the neighborhood, which was then densely populated with evergreen trees. This privacy sight and sound barrier served the neighborhood for well over 20 years until the board decided that a landscaping project held more importance.
Again as one of the few homeowners to attend board meetings, I objected to the proposal of destroying a much needed feature that was purposely designed to serve a purpose. As I presented my arguments explaining how the trees blocked the sights and sounds of the adjacent intersection, the board however argued the barrier was no longer effective and insisted the evergreens were diseased necessitating there removal. The landscaping project was approved.
The project was huge in scale, cutting down dozens of evergreens standing 40 feet tall and replacing them with disiguous shrubs and bushes, none of which would ever grow to more the a couple feet in height or hold leaves / needles during the winter months. Not only did the board destroy the sight and sound barrier but their landscaping project severely impacted the values of homes bordering the street that were once protected by the evergreens.
During the time of the landscaping project, the neighborhood was in total disrepair, broken and cracked sidewalks streets and curbs, burned out streetlights, sedimentary control issues and broken fencing. A vast majority of the grassy common areas had more dead spots, weeds, clover and fungus then grass.
The cost of the project quickly got out of hand, depleting the reserves forcing the board to issue two separate special assessments just for landscaping.
I literally took thousands of pictures documenting the condition of the rampant neglect within the neighborhood, also of the evergreens as they were being taken down. In addition to this I hired at my own expense an independent arborists to evaluate the state of the evergreens which were found to be disease free.
Iām way out of my league here with no real understanding of the authority given to the board but all of the action taken by my HOA seem improper and quite possibly in violation of there fiduciary duty.
āDuty of loyalty requires HOA board members to act in good faith to promote the best interests of the entire associationā
IMO the HOA didnāt promote the best interest to those homeowners living adjacent to the intersection / street, and as a whole the entire neighborhood has suffered due to the loss in privacy the evergreens once provided.
To provide some context as to the condition of the neighborhood Iāve decided to share a picture thatās representative of the overall neglect residence are forced to live with. The picture Iāve attached shows a curb in disrepair, which has existed in this condition for years. Itās not only unsightly, dragging down property values but it posses extreme tripping hazard and has left the entire community in risk of a liability lawsuit.
How does one even begin to address an HOA with so many issues?
My neighborhood is governed by an HOA built within an incorporated city surrounded by village centers. Many of ones daily necessities are within walking distance, grocery stores, restaurants, post office, gas stations and the like can all be found directly across the street. And while this is extremely convenient it brings with it a substantial amount of traffic including Semi-Trucks delivering goods 24 hours a day, even during the wee hours of the morning.
To provide some perspective, the size of the intersection leading into our development has 16 separate lanes of traffic and is situated less then 100 feet from the nearest neighborhood home.
The builder of the development understood how this could negatively impact homeowners and therefore designed features to mitigate the situation. A large dirt berm was constructed running along the entire face of the neighborhood, which was then densely populated with evergreen trees. This privacy sight and sound barrier served the neighborhood for well over 20 years until the board decided that a landscaping project held more importance.
Again as one of the few homeowners to attend board meetings, I objected to the proposal of destroying a much needed feature that was purposely designed to serve a purpose. As I presented my arguments explaining how the trees blocked the sights and sounds of the adjacent intersection, the board however argued the barrier was no longer effective and insisted the evergreens were diseased necessitating there removal. The landscaping project was approved.
The project was huge in scale, cutting down dozens of evergreens standing 40 feet tall and replacing them with disiguous shrubs and bushes, none of which would ever grow to more the a couple feet in height or hold leaves / needles during the winter months. Not only did the board destroy the sight and sound barrier but their landscaping project severely impacted the values of homes bordering the street that were once protected by the evergreens.
During the time of the landscaping project, the neighborhood was in total disrepair, broken and cracked sidewalks streets and curbs, burned out streetlights, sedimentary control issues and broken fencing. A vast majority of the grassy common areas had more dead spots, weeds, clover and fungus then grass.
The cost of the project quickly got out of hand, depleting the reserves forcing the board to issue two separate special assessments just for landscaping.
I literally took thousands of pictures documenting the condition of the rampant neglect within the neighborhood, also of the evergreens as they were being taken down. In addition to this I hired at my own expense an independent arborists to evaluate the state of the evergreens which were found to be disease free.
Iām way out of my league here with no real understanding of the authority given to the board but all of the action taken by my HOA seem improper and quite possibly in violation of there fiduciary duty.
āDuty of loyalty requires HOA board members to act in good faith to promote the best interests of the entire associationā
IMO the HOA didnāt promote the best interest to those homeowners living adjacent to the intersection / street, and as a whole the entire neighborhood has suffered due to the loss in privacy the evergreens once provided.
To provide some context as to the condition of the neighborhood Iāve decided to share a picture thatās representative of the overall neglect residence are forced to live with. The picture Iāve attached shows a curb in disrepair, which has existed in this condition for years. Itās not only unsightly, dragging down property values but it posses extreme tripping hazard and has left the entire community in risk of a liability lawsuit.
How does one even begin to address an HOA with so many issues?