Quote:
Posted By SteveL17 on 01/16/2022 4:35 AM
I live in a small community development where the developer has not yet turned control of the POA over to the members. He possesses 3 votes for each lot that he places into the POA and the members have one vote each. He makes sure to maintain a voting advantage at all times. The Board consists of him and two others who are not owners in the development. I believe there are questionable accounting practices , perhaps not illegal but nonetheless not GAAP appropriate taking place. Do I, as simply a member of the POA, have a right to see a copy of the audited statements of the association?
Are you in condominiums or in an HOA/PUD ? It may make a difference.
In general, homeowners are entitled to inspect financial records of their community association, and the board must make these records "reasonably available". Quote from one of the links below:
"North Carolina HOAs must make their "financial and other records" reasonably available for inspection and copying upon the request of lot owners or the authorized agents of lot owners. N.C. Gen. Stat. §47F-3-118. A request for inspection should be made in writing at least five business days in advance. N.C. Gen. Stat. §55A-16-02. An association can impose a reasonable inspection charge, not exceeding the estimated labor and material costs of producing or copying the records. N.C. Gen. Stat. §55A-16-03. A protocol for requesting inspection of an HOA's books and records is often outlined in the community's bylaws."
North Carolina laws governing community associations
here Laws concerning inspection of records
here For honks and giggles, I'm curious why you believe there is questionable accounting going on, especially if you (I assume) haven't been able to inspect the records. What are you seeing or hearing?
When a community is still under developer control, then the developer calls the shots. That's not shady, it's how this stuff works. There will be something in your governing documents that spells on how a community transitions to homeowner control, typically based on percentage of homes sold. The transition can take place over a number of years, with homeowners gaining seats on the board as sales milestones are met (for example on a 3-person board: 25% sold = 1 homeowner on the board, 50% sold = 2 homeowners on the board, 75% sold = 3 homeowners on the board, full homeowner control).
In other words, the transition to homeowner control is not based on developer whim, although occasionally a developer may try to retain control for some reason. But in general, developers want to sell their remaining ownership in communities and get on with the next thing. It's how they make their money, and there are carrying costs for slowing things down and retaining control which will reduce the profitably of that particular community.