Quote:
Posted By JeffP12 on 09/25/2021 4:28 AM
. . .and can find no Info in the revised code 5312 pertaining to having deed restrictions removed. . . .
I do not need to use their common areas . . .
I have asked the board to remove all CC&R's from my deed 2 months ago and the only response is "we have not put your request to the board yet, we have been busy."
Where can I find info on this in the code regarding my request and their requirements regarding such a request ? . .
Not legal advice.
1 - Maybe you need to sharpen up what you are looking for. And where to look for it. Otr what it's financially worth to you to escape.
In most or likely all jurisdictions, cross-covenanted-titled groups of properties are provided a judicial amendment or modification process. That's for those with bucks & thick skins. That's as to restrictive covenants purported to run with the title to your property.
To get a judicial deletion from title, a restriction-challenger typically must bring facts & law together to satisfy whatever ( Ohio's ) judicial criteria.
You may have to get competent legal help. Typical grounds include obsolescence, benefit-burden etc
2 - IF - IF - Ohio law provides for "expiration by operation of law" or U.S. styled MRTA, then your competent legal help could calculate if the restrictions have expired like Cinderella's pumpkin at midnight.
And then maybe apply to your land registry / title environment to expunge them from your property's title.
( I happen to live in a jurisdiction with an MRTA provision likely harsher than in most American states. Two relevant biggies are the 1981 legislative abolition of "revitalization by reference" here, to go along with express expiration formulae going back to 1929. Many Floridans would be envious.
3 - If the restrictions spring merely from easement law, maybe you should track down Ohio easement law.
There can be a subtle difference from genuine cross-covenanting, where legislatures are reluctant to imprison properties simply because they had been originally press-ganged into being "dominant tenements" but no longer use the privileges ( as you claimed above ).
One such California example was actually applied on Hot Bench last week to free a non-benefitting property. . .
4 - Good luck with acquiring or hiring the skillsets to escape . . .