NpB (Arizona)
Posts: 605
Posts: 605
Posted:
Nine months ago, I received an e-mail from my HOA indicating that in preparation for the complex wide painting project, certain limited common elements that are part of the exterior of a unit need to be repaired and that affected owners will be notified in the next few weeks if repairs are required. I never received any written notification that the limited common elements of my unit were affected. Fast forward nine months, and I receive a charge for repairs to my garage door trim. This charge is a separate line item, however it was added to the monthly HOA dues, so that charge, plus the regular monthly assessment are due on the 1st of September.
I did verify in the owner packet provided to all owners that garage door trim is 100% the responsibility of the individual owner. This homeowner packet also states "This guide outlines the general parameters that will be used to apportion responsibility. The unique facts of each situation will be taken into consideration when determining responsibility. This is a guide, not a contract." The owner packet also states "There is no provision that allows the HOA to "waive" these expenses or to "exempt" any unit owner form his/her legal obligation to the Association." I also discovered that A.R.S. 33-1255(C1) states "Any common expense or portion of a common expense benefitting fewer than all of the units shall be assessed exclusively against the units benefitted."
I acknowledge the aforementioned paragraph, but if I was never notified that my limited common element needed repair, nor given the opportunity to make the repairs myself before a certain deadline (most likely at a far less cost that what the HOA billed me for), how likely appealable and reversible is this charge? On one hand, state law is pretty clear, but then the HOA's owner packet states "This is a guide, not a contract."
What convincing points would you mention in an appeal of this charge?
I did verify in the owner packet provided to all owners that garage door trim is 100% the responsibility of the individual owner. This homeowner packet also states "This guide outlines the general parameters that will be used to apportion responsibility. The unique facts of each situation will be taken into consideration when determining responsibility. This is a guide, not a contract." The owner packet also states "There is no provision that allows the HOA to "waive" these expenses or to "exempt" any unit owner form his/her legal obligation to the Association." I also discovered that A.R.S. 33-1255(C1) states "Any common expense or portion of a common expense benefitting fewer than all of the units shall be assessed exclusively against the units benefitted."
I acknowledge the aforementioned paragraph, but if I was never notified that my limited common element needed repair, nor given the opportunity to make the repairs myself before a certain deadline (most likely at a far less cost that what the HOA billed me for), how likely appealable and reversible is this charge? On one hand, state law is pretty clear, but then the HOA's owner packet states "This is a guide, not a contract."
What convincing points would you mention in an appeal of this charge?