KyleG3 (Georgia)
Posts: 3
Posts: 3
Posted:
I'm a relatively new board member to a 74 unit condo high rise in Georgia. It is illegal to use pot here in GA. We have had an issue with one floor of our building consistently experiencing the pungent stench of marijuana on a regular basis. It was causing a ruckus on our communities social media page, and people were consistently trying to track down the perpetrator to have some sort of cessation enforced. The HOA President lived on the same floor, and he and most of the other owners had all sort of come to the same conclusion that it was one particular unit.
The best evidence that I have seen presented by my peers on the board was the fact that every single unit, 13 of 14, except for the unit in question had reportedly submitted complaints to our community association. This unit is lived in by a tenant, and the owner has had fines levied against him for nauseous odors, and on the very same night I joined the board, they voted for the tenant to be evicted. I abstained from the vote knowing essentially nothing about the situation other than rumor mill. The fines were assessed, the eviction put in place, and the smells/situation was apparently alleviated to a drastic degree. The tenant had been given an eviction date of the end of June, but the owner was under the mistaken impression that GA landlords are required to give 60 days notice to tenants (not the case with a lease in place with GA law). So--the owner told her she could leave at the end of July. There were apparently 4 days of instances in early July where the smell was back. As an automatic reflex, the HOA president levied fines and began discussion of the fact that the eviction was not followed through with--and that we should put an additional fine in place on a daily basis until the owner complies.
Apparently, on the 7th day of July, one of the days which the pot smoking allegation was made against this owner's tenant, there had been a rallying chorus of complaints on social media about the pot stench. The owner alleges to have gone to the property, verified there was no smell, and even brought one other guy over (who had spoken of the smell on social media) to verify that the smell wasn't coming out of his unit. Now, he is feeling that the "best efforts" of the board are verifiably ineffective and unreliable, as he feels he has proven that this occasion and thus all occasions could not have been his tenant.
Now--I am new to this. 3 of the other board members seem to feel some strong conviction that the violating unit is in fact the tenant of this owner, and the owner is contesting this. It does seem exceptionally difficult to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the smell is or is not coming from a unit without opening the door and verifying the situation. So, the owner is wanting us to vacate the eviction and remove his fines. Has anyone else ever dealt with the hard to pinpoint issue of nauseous odor? I still don't feel like I have enough facts to be able to render a decision, when the rest of the board seems to have their convictions in line. Does anyone have any thoughts or recommendations they care to share? Deeply appreciated. At the end of the day, the pot smell has caused two other tenants to move. I want to preserve the community, but I also don't want to railroad the rights of one owner when we cannot categorically and undeniably prove that his tenant is the culprit.
The best evidence that I have seen presented by my peers on the board was the fact that every single unit, 13 of 14, except for the unit in question had reportedly submitted complaints to our community association. This unit is lived in by a tenant, and the owner has had fines levied against him for nauseous odors, and on the very same night I joined the board, they voted for the tenant to be evicted. I abstained from the vote knowing essentially nothing about the situation other than rumor mill. The fines were assessed, the eviction put in place, and the smells/situation was apparently alleviated to a drastic degree. The tenant had been given an eviction date of the end of June, but the owner was under the mistaken impression that GA landlords are required to give 60 days notice to tenants (not the case with a lease in place with GA law). So--the owner told her she could leave at the end of July. There were apparently 4 days of instances in early July where the smell was back. As an automatic reflex, the HOA president levied fines and began discussion of the fact that the eviction was not followed through with--and that we should put an additional fine in place on a daily basis until the owner complies.
Apparently, on the 7th day of July, one of the days which the pot smoking allegation was made against this owner's tenant, there had been a rallying chorus of complaints on social media about the pot stench. The owner alleges to have gone to the property, verified there was no smell, and even brought one other guy over (who had spoken of the smell on social media) to verify that the smell wasn't coming out of his unit. Now, he is feeling that the "best efforts" of the board are verifiably ineffective and unreliable, as he feels he has proven that this occasion and thus all occasions could not have been his tenant.
Now--I am new to this. 3 of the other board members seem to feel some strong conviction that the violating unit is in fact the tenant of this owner, and the owner is contesting this. It does seem exceptionally difficult to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the smell is or is not coming from a unit without opening the door and verifying the situation. So, the owner is wanting us to vacate the eviction and remove his fines. Has anyone else ever dealt with the hard to pinpoint issue of nauseous odor? I still don't feel like I have enough facts to be able to render a decision, when the rest of the board seems to have their convictions in line. Does anyone have any thoughts or recommendations they care to share? Deeply appreciated. At the end of the day, the pot smell has caused two other tenants to move. I want to preserve the community, but I also don't want to railroad the rights of one owner when we cannot categorically and undeniably prove that his tenant is the culprit.