Quote:
Posted By NancyD5 on 04/05/2021 11:00 PM
Thank you for your response and no I do not fight dues. We are a fairly new and very inexperienced single family 20 unit condo development. What concerns me here is not following the State Statutes and getting ourselves into trouble. Since I am not a lawyer all I can tell you is what the Statute says and when it says "all common surpluses of the association shall be credited to the unit owners' assessments" makes me think there's no choice here but doing that or doing the later, "shall be used for any other purpose the association decides". Then when I read in the Statutes section on definitions what it says the word "association" means it says "all the condominium's unit owners acting as a group" so that's why I thought this is a voting matter for the membership. Staying out of legal trouble is my goal and so not following a Statute worries me.
Being concerned about following the law is a good thing. And learning to understand legalese can be a challenge. One thing to remember is that you have to read all relevant parts of the law (ie, don't take a single sentence as the whole story) and you can't read anything into the law that isn't there. It's not unusual to find a statement that seems very straightforward, but which also contains some kind of limiting clause such as "except as otherwise specified elsewhere".
The statement you quoted in your OP says surplus money shall be returned to the owners OR shall be used as specified in the Declaration OR shall be used for any other purpose as decided by the association. This gives your board pretty broad leeway. It would be a misreading of that statement to assume that surplus must be returned to homeowners.
Also, as someone else noted, the phrase "as the association decides" means "as the board decides" except for a few possible instances where homeowner approval is necessary. For example, in some states and in some communities, homeowners must approve annual budgets or assessment increases over a certain percentage. I don't think this is common - and I refer to such things as a license to commit financial suicide, since few owners understand association budgeting and expenses are what they are no matter how much we'd like them to be otherwise.
One thing I noticed is that your community is small (only 20 homes). Small associations have all of the complexity and legal requirements of larger ones, except for maybe no amenities. Small does not mean "simple". In fact, small associations have less wiggle room if things don't go according to plan. For instance, a single delinquent owner is 5% of your income - whereas in a large community it would be a tiny fraction of their income and easily compensated for. And a professional property manager makes no financial sense for very small associations, which means that the board needs additional knowledge, skills and free time to handle the property management side of things. So a small association will have unique challenges just because of its size.