Quote:
Posted By BenA2 on 02/16/2021 1:41 PM
Most of what I've read came from lawsuits involving pools and spas also, mainly "adult swim" rules. Common sense would say if you can't discriminate against children at the pool, the same would hold true in other areas.
Keep reading. HUD does allow reasonable rules requiring supervision of kids, of certain ages, at pools and the like. But by my reading, rules that tend to force kids indoors are looked upon unfavorably by HUD.
I agree to disagree on HUD's helpfulness. A great example is how HUD will not nail down exactly what supervision requirements are allowable under the FHA. HUD takes these situations, of questionable requirements for supervision, case by case.
Because I think the point of this forum is to educate, here's a great example from 2020 of when and why HUD will file charges of discrimination based on familial status:
https://www.ajjcs.net/paper/main/2020/10/11/hud-issues-fair-housing-charge-against-wyoming-property-owner-management-agent-and-onsite-manager-for-familial-status-violation/
I attach the court complaint that was filed in September 2020 with an administrative law judge. Note how the family who made the complaint submitted its complaint nearly three years before filed suit, in November, 2017. Note how HUD alleges the family had to move into really crummy housing.
Unlawful housing discrimination is a big deal. But navigating the bureaucratic maze of submitting a HUD complaint is god-awful. Complainants burn out; suffer financial losses; become dismayed with government. They are typically impoverished and so particularly vulnerable to the worst that society has to offer. I am assisting someone in the thick of having his FHA complaint evaluated. Many months have passed. The stupid HOA is putting more screws on him. But the complaint is in slo-mo amidst the mighty cogs and gears of HUD's system. This man is suffering horribly.
I am not interested in off-the-top-of-one's-head impressions about the Fair Housing Act or violations of same.