šŸ’¬ Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚔ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

StevenG9 (Florida)
Posts: 14
Posted:
We have a resident who sent a letter to the board complaining about another boardmember and his delivery and speaking to her regarding a loose dog. Is it the board responsibility to do the dirty work and say something to a board member? Shouldn’t the resident be encouraged to come to the next meeting and discuss it openly rather than remain anonymous?
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
This sounds like a personal dispute between a board member and a h homeowner. Board members ARE homeowners, after all, so if this complaint is more of a personality clash, the rest of you (assuming you're on the board) should stay out of it and let them hash it out. The board should only get involved if there's an issue related to association business - for example, if this board member let loose and cussed the lady out during a board meeting, that's unprofessional and he or she should be called on it.

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
Forgot to add I'm not a fan of anonymous complaints at all. If you're going to be ballsy enough to accuse anyone of bad behavior, you should be man or woman enough to confront that person. Otherwise, I get the feeling you're just spreading gossip. I do understand some people are genuinely concerned about retaliation, in which case, there are ways to investigate the matter while keeping the person's name out of it. If the board can verify something happened on its own, it's probably not necessary to bring the complainant into it.

That said, it depends on the type of complaint - if it's a personal beef, I'm not wasting my time. If it concerns abuse or misuse of the common area, you better come up with names, dates, and other specific information. You should also understand that while your name might be kept confidential as the investigation starts, all bets are off if the matter escalates to legal action, because you may need to be subpoenaed to come to court and testify as to what you saw and did. At that point, it's too late to worry about anonymity anyway.

Such is life in a country where the Constitution guarantees the right to confront one's accusers. It's not there to work at your convenience and while people shouldn't be discouraged from filing complaints if there's a genuine concern, they also need to understand they're setting serious activity in motion - no one has time for petty stuff.

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
ChrisE8
Posts: 454
Posted:
I've received an anonymous complaint/threat. I didn't care and the board didn't care. No action was taken. If someone wants to act anonymously, generally the person can, but it's not as effective as standing up and putting your name on your complaint.
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
I agree with Sheila: the board should stay out of spats between owners. However, if the letter was intended as a complaint about a violation of your restrictions (a dog running loose probably is a violation), then the board should take action and go through the normal violation procedure for your community.

It will be uncomfortable for the other board members and may cause other issues for them. But far too many board members ignore the rules and are never called on it. That will lead to something called selective enforcement - the board gets away with stuff that other homeowners don't. And if Joe Homeowner goes to court over selective enforcement, the court is likely to find in his favor. This can make a restriction unenforceable altogether.

So deal with the violation if any, and deal with the immediate fallout. It will prevent other problems down the road. And homeowners are more likely to cooperate when they see that board members have to play by the same rules.
GeorgeS21 (Florida)
Posts: 3,808
Posted:
Sounds easy - let all board members read the letter, then discuss the letter at the board meeting. If the board members generally think ā€œmeh,ā€ then move on.

If there is a pattern of something - then open discussion might be appropriate.
GeorgeS21 (Florida)
Posts: 3,808
Posted:
Oh, yeah - forgot - make sure to allow time for owners who wish to get their 3 minutes.
BillH10 (Texas)
Posts: 1,217
Posted:
Don't forget, if a violation of association rules or guidelines is the sort of thing which is discussed in a closed session with only the Board and the homeowner involved participating, then this matter must be discussed in closed session if a board member is involved--as was previously mentioned, a board member is an owner in the association first and a member of the Board second.
GeorgeS21 (Florida)
Posts: 3,808
Posted:
Florida has VERY limited occasions for Executive Session - personnel (employees) and lawsuits - and attorney must be present to qualify.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Steve
My initial blush is it is none of the BOD's business. I say ignore the letter or respond that it is none of the BOD's business. Personally I would got eh Benign Neglect route and respond' The BOD is in receipt of your letter. Nothing more.
GenoS (Florida)
Posts: 4,276
Posted:
Sounds to me like the COMPLAINING HOMEOWNER is the one who sent a letter to the board about a BOARD MEMBER's WAY OF SPEAKING to the complainant. Apparently some others aren't reading it the same way I am.

I think it rises higher than a neighbor-neighbor dispute if the director starts waving around his/her position to intimidate or bully a homeowner.
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
That's possible, but this can also be subjective. Has the board member had issues with this homeowner before outside his/her role as a board member? Have other people complained about the dog, the lady didn't respond and the board member happened to come upon the dog doing whatever's annoying everyone (e.g. constant barking?) Conversely, perhaps this lady began berating the board member about someone's dog, and things got heated?

There are board members who try to use their position to bully a homeowner, but you also know some people exaggerate what really happened (easy to do when there are no witnesses). Board members aren't made of stone and sometimes the homeowner IS in the wrong and wants to start some confusion.
Unless there were witnesses and perhaps if this board member has a reputation for this sort of thing, I think you have to start with treating this as a neighbor-neighbor dispute. These disputes can easily escalate when people began to shout, cuss, point their finger, raise their voices or do something else that sets off the other person, and some people are more sensitive than others for whatever reason.

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
I'm reading it like Geno is. I think, but am not sure, that the owner/director was berating the woman for HER dog's behavior.
StevenG9 (Florida)
Posts: 14
Posted:
Right. And she now claims not the first time. Well leash the dog case closed. That’s were I’m at. The President goes the direction ā€œthis could be considered harassmentā€.
LaskaS (Texas)
Posts: 1,025
Posted:
Oh my gosh, this same thing happened in our community. If the complaint is about a well liked board member within the board, the board is likely to say "meh".
If the complaint is about a board member who is not well liked on the board, the other board members are likely to try and make a mountain out of a molehill.

I'm really tired of people using the term "harassment" as a scare tactic. Being an as* is not harassment. If someone feels harassed.. tell them to go to the police.
MarshallT (New York)
Posts: 414
Posted:
Hi,

This does sound like a personal matter between the owner and board member. Keep the letter in case the problem does escalate, but not much can be done right now if the homeowner just didn't like the way he spoke to her. There's no way to prove that the board member acted improperly.

If this becomes a pattern and the board member habitually speaks to people in an unprofessional manner, then action should be taken.
MarshallT (New York)
Posts: 414
Posted:
Hi,

This does sound like a personal matter between the owner and board member. Keep the letter in case the problem does escalate, but not much can be done right now if the homeowner just didn't like the way he spoke to her. There's no way to prove that the board member acted improperly.

If this becomes a pattern and the board member habitually speaks to people in an unprofessional manner, then action should be taken.
StevenG9 (Florida)
Posts: 14
Posted:
He has a habit of speaking to people unprofessionally. But we have little to no community involvement so he can’t be completely unseated unless the community votes. The board could unseat his executive position but...He’s a good Treasurer. Why he can use our form letters enter the rule violation and stick it in the mail is beyond me.
AugustinD
Posts: 5,144
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By StevenG9 on 02/03/2021 6:34 AM
He has a habit of speaking to people unprofessionally.
-- This is a gossip-y subject.

-- I think making such conduct into a violation of the governing documents will be, at a minimum, strained.

-- I agree with SheliaH's counsel.

-- Any owner the problem has with another owner must be made by formal complaint, including a citation of exactly which rule the neighbor (a director) is violating.

-- This is a gossip-y subject (sic).
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Hi Steven

Just wondering if you have a policy about a Board member approaching a resident on the street about a violation.

Maybe there are some incidents where the Board thinks it's appropriate and others where the Board doesn't. Best to spell it out at some level of detail and expect all Board members to follow it.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
BenA2 (Texas)
Posts: 1,273
Posted:
I think that the complaint being anonymous is irrelevant. If the board member violated some rule that the board has control over, then take appropriate action. If the board member did not violate any rule, there is nothing to do.

Normally, a board has little control of what a board member does. They are owners and have the same rights as every other owner.
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BenA2 on 02/07/2021 12:31 PM
I think that the complaint being anonymous is irrelevant. If the board member violated some rule that the board has control over, then take appropriate action. If the board member did not violate any rule, there is nothing to do.

Normally, a board has little control of what a board member does. They are owners and have the same rights as every other owner.

It's absolutely relevant whether a complaint is anonymous or not. The board has to have reasonable evidence to support their actions. Otherwise the accused will just say "prove it". If you wind up in court - maybe not for this complaint but for something that results in fines - a judge would throw out anonymous complaints as hearsay and rule against the HOA.

Having signed complaints is even more important if you're dealing with something that can't be independently verified by the board.

Anonymous complaint about a value judgement? We wouldn't touch those with a ten-foot pole.

The board should never allow itself to be used as a tool for people pursuing private grudges.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BenA2 on 02/07/2021 12:31 PM
I think that the complaint being anonymous is irrelevant. If the board member violated some rule that the board has control over, then take appropriate action. If the board member did not violate any rule, there is nothing to do.

Normally, a board has little control of what a board member does. They are owners and have the same rights as every other owner.

The tipping point for me is whether the Board member approached the owner about a violation, not whether the Board member is also an owner.

I suggest that the Board create a policy (or rule if you want to call it that instead) that sets limits on what a Board member can approach another homeowner face-to-face about violations.

IMO, it's a very bad policy to have Board members go face-to-face with other homeowners about violations. I've seen enough screaming matches out on the street to know that it is appropriate for the Board to put some controls in place and expect the Board members to comply - no matter what their personal opinion is.

Perceived authority is an important issue. As soon as the Board member says "you are in violation" the perception is that the Board member is speaking with the authority of the Board. This kind of behavior should be managed.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
JohnT38 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,631
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By NpS on 02/07/2021 1:41 PM
Posted By BenA2 on 02/07/2021 12:31 PM
I think that the complaint being anonymous is irrelevant. If the board member violated some rule that the board has control over, then take appropriate action. If the board member did not violate any rule, there is nothing to do.

Normally, a board has little control of what a board member does. They are owners and have the same rights as every other owner.


The tipping point for me is whether the Board member approached the owner about a violation, not whether the Board member is also an owner.

I suggest that the Board create a policy (or rule if you want to call it that instead) that sets limits on what a Board member can approach another homeowner face-to-face about violations.

IMO, it's a very bad policy to have Board members go face-to-face with other homeowners about violations. I've seen enough screaming matches out on the street to know that it is appropriate for the Board to put some controls in place and expect the Board members to comply - no matter what their personal opinion is.

Perceived authority is an important issue. As soon as the Board member says "you are in violation" the perception is that the Board member is speaking with the authority of the Board. This kind of behavior should be managed.

Re-read the original post. It is vague and because it's anonymous important info may have been left out. I am on the Board but I have a neighbor that continuously let's his pitt bull loose. On multiple occasions when I've been walking my dog I have told the owner that unleased dogs are not allowed and to stop doing this. I believe I have every right to do this. I am also a homeowner and for my safety and others I'll call him out every time.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnT38 on 02/07/2021 1:48 PM
Posted By NpS on 02/07/2021 1:41 PM
Posted By BenA2 on 02/07/2021 12:31 PM
I think that the complaint being anonymous is irrelevant. If the board member violated some rule that the board has control over, then take appropriate action. If the board member did not violate any rule, there is nothing to do.

Normally, a board has little control of what a board member does. They are owners and have the same rights as every other owner.


The tipping point for me is whether the Board member approached the owner about a violation, not whether the Board member is also an owner.

I suggest that the Board create a policy (or rule if you want to call it that instead) that sets limits on what a Board member can approach another homeowner face-to-face about violations.

IMO, it's a very bad policy to have Board members go face-to-face with other homeowners about violations. I've seen enough screaming matches out on the street to know that it is appropriate for the Board to put some controls in place and expect the Board members to comply - no matter what their personal opinion is.

Perceived authority is an important issue. As soon as the Board member says "you are in violation" the perception is that the Board member is speaking with the authority of the Board. This kind of behavior should be managed.


Re-read the original post. It is vague and because it's anonymous important info may have been left out. I am on the Board but I have a neighbor that continuously let's his pitt bull loose. On multiple occasions when I've been walking my dog I have told the owner that unleased dogs are not allowed and to stop doing this. I believe I have every right to do this. I am also a homeowner and for my safety and others I'll call him out every time.

I agree but as does any person have the right to call him out. I suggest you report him to the BOD and let the fining commence.
JohnT38 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,631
Posted:
John, you are exactly right. The last two times this happened I snapped photos of the dog running loose and went through the process that homeowners use for reporting violations.
BenA2 (Texas)
Posts: 1,273
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CathyA3 on 02/07/2021 1:24 PM
Posted By BenA2 on 02/07/2021 12:31 PM
I think that the complaint being anonymous is irrelevant. If the board member violated some rule that the board has control over, then take appropriate action. If the board member did not violate any rule, there is nothing to do.

Normally, a board has little control of what a board member does. They are owners and have the same rights as every other owner.


It's absolutely relevant whether a complaint is anonymous or not. The board has to have reasonable evidence to support their actions. Otherwise the accused will just say "prove it". If you wind up in court - maybe not for this complaint but for something that results in fines - a judge would throw out anonymous complaints as hearsay and rule against the HOA.

Having signed complaints is even more important if you're dealing with something that can't be independently verified by the board.

Anonymous complaint about a value judgement? We wouldn't touch those with a ten-foot pole.

The board should never allow itself to be used as a tool for people pursuing private grudges.

My point was that we should not ignore a complaint simply because it was made anonymously when it involves an actual violation of some rule. The main question being, did the director violate any rules. If not, the whole thing is moot.

I agree that if the director denied anything happened then nothing could be done with an anonymous complaint.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Ben

When we receive an anonymous complaint we have a BOD Member investigate it. Our PM sends all violation notices, under their signature, when directed to by our BOD.
AugustinD
Posts: 5,144
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BenA2 on 02/07/2021 3:58 PM

My point was that we should not ignore a complaint simply because it was made anonymously when it involves an actual violation of some rule. The main question being, did the director violate any rules. If not, the whole thing is moot. I agree that if the director denied anything happened then nothing could be done with an anonymous complaint.
I disagree. At the federal county, city and state levels, unless there is a safety issue, anonymous complaints are not accepted. In my opinion, the reasoning behind this is partly legal and largely common sense.
StevenG9 (Florida)
Posts: 14
Posted:
Update.

The letter was provided to the BOD minus the director the complaint is about prior to our meeting last week. The topic was brought up in a very odd manor in my opinion and the residents in attendance were floored just as I was. With the elephant in the room the President instead of confronting the director at the meeting or prior suggested and was wanting to take the complaints and refer them to outside counsel to review. I quickly motioned we NOT hire anyone to review a complaint. The President tried to omit my motion but my motion was also quickly second by another BOD. All were in favor of my motion except him. As many of you have stated it’s gossip, moot, and the director has not broken anytime himself except not following the violation procedure = letter, 2nd letter, fine notice. The woman who made the complaint was invited to attend the meeting but of course did not. We did reiterate the process and that I needs to be followed. I think we need to decide as a board to unseat this president if he is so fearful of general management. He’s just going to position us to be sued.
AugustinD
Posts: 5,144
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By StevenG9 on 02/08/2021 12:09 PM
The topic was brought up in a very odd manor in my opinion and the residents in attendance were floored just as I was.
-- Thank you for the update. Thank you for trying to do the right thing.

-- Is this a condominium or non-condominium?

-- I would look at FS 720 (non-condo) and FS 718 (condo) to see what they say, if anything, about publicizing complaints about owners (it does not matter if the owner is also a director). Some state statutes say this can only be done in executive session.

-- The board, thanks to letting the President pull this, is flirting with a possible defamation action by the director, in the worst case. Intermediate responses may be a letter from his/her attorney to the HOA/condo attorney, costing all members.

-- I think CathyA3 expressed well the major problems with an anonymous complaint.
StevenG9 (Florida)
Posts: 14
Posted:
We are non condo

I’ll read over 720 and see what I can learn. To clarify if wasn’t so much an anonymous complaint it was more the president didn’t want to share this email from the resident to the director but has always in the past.
JoyceH5 (Nevada)
Posts: 7
Posted:
We had a homeowner doing something prohibited in his common area garage. It turned out to be an insurance hazard. This particular owner is very opinionated. Has an answer/ argument for everything. No one in the Board wanted to address his behavior for fear of his attitude. He's gotten into arguments with our contractors, pissed off maintenance agents etc. Long story short I witnessed him committing the violation and told him to send a letter to the board to discuss the violation. He immediately wrote a complaint accused me of things that did not happen. Luckily I had two witnesses. Now he continues the violation despite a letter from the board and is targeting me. Making complaints about me, photographing my unit posting lies on social media. I've had 3 nails in my tires in the last 3 months. Pretty coincidental. That's just for starters. The entire Board is tired of these bullying tactics but do not want to be targets themselves by speaking out. Its like being alone on an island. How to handle being a lone board member fighting the good fight?
AugustinD
Posts: 5,144
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JoyceH5 on 02/14/2021 11:50 AM
How to handle being a lone board member fighting the good fight?
I am quite sorry for the severe (and if provable, likely criminal) harassment you are suffering.

The question of how to cause change when one is a minority on a Board comes here a lot. It is as political as anything being done in the U. S. Congress, but with fewer protections and certainly no newspaper coverage to protect you. In my opinion, your options are:

(1) stay on the board but do not rock the board. Abstain from votes as needed. For the next election recruit others who see things as you do, and try to attain a majority on the board.

(2) resign. Wait until the next election. Recruit others and with yourself, try to attain a majority on the board.

(3) move. Seriously, it's an option many exercise. Working with apathetic communities that let poorly qualified volunteers make huge decisions about what is usually the biggest investment of one's life (one's housing) is too stressful. Life is short.
JoyceH5 (Nevada)
Posts: 7
Posted:
It is hard. Thank you for the advice. I've been on the Board for 6 years. This homeowner has been in the community for 8 months and has just reeked havoc. The problem is now we have a major insurance violation occurring that could cause us severe financial harm if an accident was to happen. I can't locate anything in the CCNR'S about handling exigent circumstances and we have always been fortunate enough to work with homeowners to fix violations. We very rarely even fine anyone or issue violation letters. We have always just worked together and solved problems without doing that. We are contacting our HOA Attorney this week.
AugustinD
Posts: 5,144
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JoyceH5 on 02/14/2021 12:15 PM
We are contacting our HOA Attorney this week.
I love the "we." I love the "contacting our HOA attorney." Cool.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Joyce

You BOD needs a spine.
JoyceH5 (Nevada)
Posts: 7
Posted:
Absolutely. I think that's why they send me to handle this stuff but I need more teeth. Our policies are so vague. I need a table with fine amounts for violations. A lot of hoa's have these. We never have. A lot of changes need to happen.

KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Sorry, too, for your plight, Joyce. It's better though to start a new thread tha to detract from an existing one.

Seeing an HOA attorney is the right thing to do. BTW, Do your CC&Rs profit hazardous materials or behavior?
JoyceH5 (Nevada)
Posts: 7
Posted:
Sorry about that, I can delete. How do I delete?
JoyceH5 (Nevada)
Posts: 7
Posted:
Sorry about that, I can delete. How do I delete?
JoyceH5 (Nevada)
Posts: 7
Posted:
Sorry about that, I can delete. How do I delete?
JoyceH5 (Nevada)
Posts: 7
Posted:
Sorry about that, I can delete. How do I delete?

šŸŽÆ You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • āœ“ Ask follow-up questions
  • āœ“ Share your experience
  • āœ“ Get expert advice
  • āœ“ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚔ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here