ChrisE8
Posts: 454
Posts: 454
Posted:
I'm dealing with bylaws that require the approval of 100% of owners to approve changes as long as the original developer holds any interests in the HOA. The bylaws were written decades ago and don't match how the HOA currently works. Owners have pointed this out.
HOA management went to the developer and said, "if you'll agree to lower this approval requirement to something more reasonable, even 75% to 90%, we'll add a prohibition on amending bylaws without your consent."
The developer said no (in my view, out of spite). The developer wouldn't really agree to any bylaw amendments, other than a few minor things.
So we're stuck with bylaws that basically can't be amended, even to match changes in state law.
Has anyone dealt with governing documents that require unanimity for amendments? If so, what did you do in that case?
I figure that we could amend the Certificate of Incorporation instead and put whatever we want in it, since that has a much lower approval threshold, and the bylaws (I believe) say that in case of a conflict, the Certificate of Incorporation controls.
If the developer is on the board, couldn't it be a breach of fiduciary duty to refuse to make normal, legally-required updates to the bylaws?
Thanks.
HOA management went to the developer and said, "if you'll agree to lower this approval requirement to something more reasonable, even 75% to 90%, we'll add a prohibition on amending bylaws without your consent."
The developer said no (in my view, out of spite). The developer wouldn't really agree to any bylaw amendments, other than a few minor things.
So we're stuck with bylaws that basically can't be amended, even to match changes in state law.
Has anyone dealt with governing documents that require unanimity for amendments? If so, what did you do in that case?
I figure that we could amend the Certificate of Incorporation instead and put whatever we want in it, since that has a much lower approval threshold, and the bylaws (I believe) say that in case of a conflict, the Certificate of Incorporation controls.
If the developer is on the board, couldn't it be a breach of fiduciary duty to refuse to make normal, legally-required updates to the bylaws?
Thanks.