💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

ArtB1 (Florida)
Posts: 97
Posted:
This applies to Florida homes (not condos).

We have a rule about keeping trash cans inside.

Week 1 – I violate trash cans and letter sent
Weeks 2 and 3 – I obey the rules
Week 4 – I again violate trash cans
Week 5 – I am good
Week 6 – I again violate

So my question is when can we fine? Nothing specific in our Covenants, just says we can fine.

Do have to do a warning letter for each violation after week 1 (week 4 and week 6)?

Or can we start fining in weeks 4 and 6 because they have already been warned?

Thanks

DouglasK1 (Florida)
Posts: 2,046
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ArtB1 on 12/10/2020 12:28 PM
This applies to Florida homes (not condos).

We have a rule about keeping trash cans inside.

Week 1 – I violate trash cans and letter sent
Weeks 2 and 3 – I obey the rules
Week 4 – I again violate trash cans
Week 5 – I am good
Week 6 – I again violate

So my question is when can we fine? Nothing specific in our Covenants, just says we can fine.

Do have to do a warning letter for each violation after week 1 (week 4 and week 6)?

Or can we start fining in weeks 4 and 6 because they have already been warned?

I don't see where following the rule some weeks would reset the warning counter. If your policy is to fine after 2 warnings are sent, then week 6 should incur a fine.

Escaped former treasurer and director of a self managed association.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ArtB1 on 12/10/2020 12:28 PM
This applies to Florida homes (not condos).

We have a rule about keeping trash cans inside.

Week 1 – I violate trash cans and letter sent
Weeks 2 and 3 – I obey the rules
Week 4 – I again violate trash cans
Week 5 – I am good
Week 6 – I again violate

So my question is when can we fine? Nothing specific in our Covenants, just says we can fine.

Do have to do a warning letter for each violation after week 1 (week 4 and week 6)?

Or can we start fining in weeks 4 and 6 because they have already been warned?

Thanks


Art

Typically a Fining Schedule will say a repeat violation is not a new violation. So for your above:

Week 1 – I violate trash cans and letter sent. This is your first offense. Warning letter sent.
Weeks 2 and 3 – I obey the rules
Week 4 – I again violate trash cans. This is your 2nd offense. First fine say $25.
Week 5 – I am good
Week 6 – I again violate. This is your 3rd violation. Second fine say $50.

When fines commence and amount should be part of Fining Schedule
ArtB1 (Florida)
Posts: 97
Posted:
This is what I suspected and I will encourage the board to adopt a formal fining schedule

That said, does it matter how much time there is between violations?

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ArtB1 on 12/10/2020 2:18 PM
This is what I suspected and I will encourage the board to adopt a formal fining schedule

That said, does it matter how much time there is between violations?


We did not specify any time between.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
That is something you have to establish in the fining schedule. The fallacy of HOA fining is it lacks definition. Just saying "We can fine" doesn't provide much more than that. A fining schedule which has to be passed to ALL membership, put in the definition of time/amount/what.

Our HOA we had the right to fine but no fining schedule. Instead what we did is if you violated the rules, we could hire someone to fix the violation and send owner the bill. If they refused to pay that bill, then we can lien them for it. You can't foreclose for it just lien.

Example: We notify them to paint their home. If they refused, we would paint the house and send them a bill. They had no choice in contractor nor price. So either they painted it on their dime or ours. If it is ours, we aren't necessarily going to find the "cheapest" contractor. Plus if you refuse to pay up, we lien. Which doesn't let you sell your home till paid up. This is an extreme example but this is how it would work in our HOA. That is because we owned the property around the homes so it wasn't trespassing...

Former HOA President
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 12/10/2020 2:26 PM
That is something you have to establish in the fining schedule. The fallacy of HOA fining is it lacks definition. Just saying "We can fine" doesn't provide much more than that. A fining schedule which has to be passed to ALL membership, put in the definition of time/amount/what.

Our HOA we had the right to fine but no fining schedule. Instead what we did is if you violated the rules, we could hire someone to fix the violation and send owner the bill. If they refused to pay that bill, then we can lien them for it. You can't foreclose for it just lien.

Example: We notify them to paint their home. If they refused, we would paint the house and send them a bill. They had no choice in contractor nor price. So either they painted it on their dime or ours. If it is ours, we aren't necessarily going to find the "cheapest" contractor. Plus if you refuse to pay up, we lien. Which doesn't let you sell your home till paid up. This is an extreme example but this is how it would work in our HOA. That is because we owned the property around the homes so it wasn't trespassing...

While I do not disagree with the right for an Association to go on the property, correct the violation, and bill the owner in this day and age of gun violence, I for one would not go on the property without some legal paperwork and an armed guard, and even then I would personally would not do it.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
I know many people bring up that issue. It just that in our HOA it was established with every owner that moved in how it was set up. So they knew that the HOA owned the property around their homes. Plus it was in the restrictions on what we could do.

So no this isn't for every HOA or situation. However, that was our option instead of fining. Plus it wasn't as extreme as house painting. (Ex-President con-job) It would be more for the smaller violations like trash pick up. We had dumpster so no trash cans left out. It may be repairing a dangerous fence or other situation. So it's not like we are going on people's property and fixing things. We didn't have the budget for it to hire anyone anyways.

Former HOA President
GenoS (Florida)
Posts: 4,276
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ArtB1 on 12/10/2020 2:18 PM
This is what I suspected and I will encourage the board to adopt a formal fining schedule

That said, does it matter how much time there is between violations?


This is a good question, Art, and I will leave it to others to give you some solid advice. My HOA does not fine and this year, with 20 new owners (out of 100), our own situation with trash cans being left outside despite a rule against it, has been getting worse. It makes for friction and tension when many people who have lived here for years all of a sudden are looking at trash cans knocked over and laying on the street at about a dozen homes and the Board will not do anything about it. Not even a friendly phone call to remind them of the Rules & Regulations. Have been pushing for a fining schedule for 3 years now with no one interested because no one wants to "make anyone mad". That policy is making things worse.

Anyway, there is a difference in violations between those that are instantaneous vs those that are continuous and ongoing. Different places have different ways of dealing with both types. I tend to agree with a schedule that escalates the amount of a fine for subsequent violations of the same nature within X days/months of each other.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 12/10/2020 2:41 PM
I know many people bring up that issue. It just that in our HOA it was established with every owner that moved in how it was set up. So they knew that the HOA owned the property around their homes. Plus it was in the restrictions on what we could do.

So no this isn't for every HOA or situation. However, that was our option instead of fining. Plus it wasn't as extreme as house painting. (Ex-President con-job) It would be more for the smaller violations like trash pick up. We had dumpster so no trash cans left out. It may be repairing a dangerous fence or other situation. So it's not like we are going on people's property and fixing things. We didn't have the budget for it to hire anyone anyways.

I agree but the problem in many believe step foot on my property and I will shoot your a$$. Had a situation here in SC where a Father and Son opened fire on/killed some city???? workers lawfully sent on the property.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Well maybe I was secretly hoping for that to happen to the ex-president who was trying to run a scam on the HOA... It was his idea after all...

He tried to convince me that the HOA should pay him to paint someone's home that was in violation. We could then collect from the owner via lien if they did not pay the HOA. He of course had a paint company. (He only employee). Can you see the problem here? The HOA had to front the money and the money for the lien. We couldn't afford $100 extra a month never the less to pay him $2K + to do a crappy paint job with a sprayer.

Instead what I did is notified the owner their house could use some "attention" and what we can do if they didn't. I would then suggest using the ex-president's company if they wanted. Otherwise they could use anyone they wanted. We never forced anyone to paint their homes. Just made them aware it wasn't looking good. Plus by suggesting the Ex-President he wasn't sucking off the HOA dime.

So it got him not to rip off the HOA and owner may paint their home. Yes, there were a few incidents where they ran him off their land for good right... LOL!

Former HOA President
JohnC77 (California)
Posts: 562
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 12/10/2020 2:26 PM
That is something you have to establish in the fining schedule. The fallacy of HOA fining is it lacks definition. Just saying "We can fine" doesn't provide much more than that. A fining schedule which has to be passed to ALL membership, put in the definition of time/amount/what.

Our HOA we had the right to fine but no fining schedule. Instead what we did is if you violated the rules, we could hire someone to fix the violation and send owner the bill. If they refused to pay that bill, then we can lien them for it. You can't foreclose for it just lien.

Example: We notify them to paint their home. If they refused, we would paint the house and send them a bill. They had no choice in contractor nor price. So either they painted it on their dime or ours. If it is ours, we aren't necessarily going to find the "cheapest" contractor. Plus if you refuse to pay up, we lien. Which doesn't let you sell your home till paid up. This is an extreme example but this is how it would work in our HOA. That is because we owned the property around the homes so it wasn't trespassing...

So exactly how are you going to get the trash cans either in the locked backyard or locked garage?
GeorgeS21 (Florida)
Posts: 3,808
Posted:
Melissa,

Please don’t encourage others to go onto private property based on CCRs or other HOA governing docs.

From my admittedly limited reading, this is NOT recommended by HOA attorneys due to risk to individuals, and to the HOA itself.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
I am not encouraging anyone. I am pointing out an option that is available outside of fining. It's not perfect but it is an option. BTW: We don't have trash cans.

Former HOA President
GeorgeS21 (Florida)
Posts: 3,808
Posted:
And, I am noting, from my limited reading, what you suggest is not just an option in most cases, it is dangerous.
MarshallT (New York)
Posts: 414
Posted:
Hi,

You can start fining for week 4 and 6. Just make it clear why the fine is being issued, and cite the rule that has been broken. Include the date that this warning was sent as well. Make sure to include a due date for the issue to be resolved an for the fine(s) to be paid.

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
I would send a warning letter week 1

I would send a second warning letter week 2 specifying that the board sees this as a continuing violation and if it continues, monetary penalties will be assessed.

I would then assess a fee on week 6 and each time after that (until it hasn't happened for, say, 4 to 6 months).

In my opinion, you should have pictures of each violation along with dates and times the pictures were taken as proof.
MichaelS56 (Minnesota)
Posts: 858
Posted:
Before any warning letters, why not talk with and listen to the person, who is leaving the garbage can out.

Then an email with a cc; to the Board explaining the concern and note the rule violation.

Then a curtesy letter from the President or from the Property management company.

Then begin the fines. Everything is documented. Do not start the process over with the same person if they periodically leave their garbage can out.

GeorgeS21 (Florida)
Posts: 3,808
Posted:
Michael ... my rental neighborhood has about 40 violations in the process right now ... personal attention to all of them? At each level of violation?

Should we hire someone to do the work you suggest?

And, then bill all those who are not in violation?
SueW6 (Michigan)
Posts: 814
Posted:
How long are these garbage cans rolling around the street in front of someone’s house? I

I’d say after 24 hours hire a handyman to go around and pick up all the trash cans that have been left out in the street. Maybe that will get the violators attention.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MichaelS56 on 12/11/2020 8:29 AM
Before any warning letters, why not talk with and listen to the person, who is leaving the garbage can out.

Then an email with a cc; to the Board explaining the concern and note the rule violation.

Then a curtesy letter from the President or from the Property management company.

Then begin the fines. Everything is documented. Do not start the process over with the same person if they periodically leave their garbage can out.


Most, if not all associations do send an informational/warning/courtesy letter (and in many case, two letters) before commencing fines. Call it what you want even a "kiss" from the association.
FloridaC1 (Florida)
Posts: 27
Posted:
In order to fine, there must be a hearing committee composed of members not on the Board so that the hearing is objective. Per Florida statutes, you must receive at least two letters with notice of hearing prior to being sent to hearing. First notice will give time to cure, typically on most violations that take time to implement such as pressure washing roof, driveway or sidewalk. Overnight parking can be brought into compliance immediately as can submitting an ARC for approval on an exterior change that was not approved but there it gets sticky, i.e. paint, roofs, exterior additions that take time to cure. There should be a fine schedule & it should be written up by the Association attorney for legal purposes. $100 fine every two weeks until reaches $1,000.00 is typical but once that fine goes over $1,000.00 in an HOA, yes, you can lien. If you sell with fines on your ledger, you will pay them prior to sale/closing. New buyer will not want to be stuck with your non-compliance. Selective enforcement creates liability for the Board. Fines would be a dead horse if people would read their use restrictions. Many do not belong in an HOA because they are rules followers and will then complain when they get fined and go to hearing.
LetA (Nevada)
Posts: 2,679
Posted:
I am as frustrated as you are. We have a problem house that keeps violating the CC&R's. We called to hearing the owner and fined them for two separate violations. The occupant keeps committing acts that violate the covenants. a few weeks ago the occupant had a car on 4 jack stands in the street for several days. because they put the wheels back on we had to rescind the fine. Personally, I am to the point that we need to keep fining the owner for every violation and not back down, but the law won't let us.
GeorgeS21 (Florida)
Posts: 3,808
Posted:
Let's parse the Florida statute provisions a bit.

The Board levies the fine, then 14 days notice to the offender, then an independent committee meets to approve or not approve (confirm or reject) the fine. If approved, the fine is payable within 5 days of the committee meeting. The HOA must provide written notice of the fine. I don't see any mention of two letters. The below is excerpted from FS720.

"(b) A fine or suspension levied by the board of administration may not be imposed unless the board first provides at least 14 days’ notice to the parcel owner and, if applicable, any occupant, licensee, or invitee of the parcel owner, sought to be fined or suspended and an opportunity for a hearing before a committee of at least three members appointed by the board who are not officers, directors, or employees of the association, or the spouse, parent, child, brother, or sister of an officer, director, or employee. If the committee, by majority vote, does not approve a proposed fine or suspension, the proposed fine or suspension may not be imposed. The role of the committee is limited to determining whether to confirm or reject the fine or suspension levied by the board. If the proposed fine or suspension levied by the board is approved by the committee, the fine payment is due 5 days after the date of the committee meeting at which the fine is approved. The association must provide written notice of such fine or suspension by mail or hand delivery to the parcel owner and, if applicable, to any tenant, licensee, or invitee of the parcel owner."

To the point of liening - FS720 is a bit fuzzier. Our attorney was very clear that fines are against people (owners) and as such cannot serve as the basis for a lien. Further, that the fine can serve as the basis for action via lawsuit, but the property cannot be liened until a finding in law occurs via a suit. I have delved no further into this, but my broad understanding is: the fining process is without teeth, until the fine is converted to the basis for court action. Would find more info on this, especially precedence via court case to be very helpful.

"(2) The association may levy reasonable fines. A fine may not exceed $100 per violation against any member or any member’s tenant, guest, or invitee for the failure of the owner of the parcel or its occupant, licensee, or invitee to comply with any provision of the declaration, the association bylaws, or reasonable rules of the association unless otherwise provided in the governing documents. A fine may be levied by the board for each day of a continuing violation, with a single notice and opportunity for hearing, except that the fine may not exceed $1,000 in the aggregate unless otherwise provided in the governing documents. A fine of less than $1,000 may not become a lien against a parcel. In any action to recover a fine, the prevailing party is entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs from the nonprevailing party as determined by the court."

I also don't know if a fine is required to be cured at closing - it may be done, but I would be concerned about holding up a closing as an HOA - UNLESS, the above rationale is inaccurate.
GenoS (Florida)
Posts: 4,276
Posted:
I, also, am not aware of any "two letters" requirement. There are certainly HOAs and condos in FL that do send a couple of letters before advancing the process of levying a fine, but as long as the privisions in the statute are followed then there isn't really a requirement to do it that way.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here