💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

ChrisE8
Posts: 454
Posted:
In the HOA in NC where I own a rental property, a board member emailed the entire HOA community (using an email list that goes to all owners), attaching a schedule of overdue accounts receivable from owners. I pay in full every month so I wasn't shown as delinquent, but I thought that HOAs shouldn't do that:

1. Wouldn't the state law equivalent of the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act prohibit this, as it's effectively using shaming to get people to pay?
2. Wouldn't the HOA be potentially liable for a defamation lawsuit if the info is incorrect?

I believe that the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act wouldn't apply because it's the HOA doing this, not a separate debt collector. I find this to be pretty poor form, though.

Has this happened in your HOA?

(The bylaws have nothing to do with this.)
JohnC77 (California)
Posts: 562
Posted:
Not illegal
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
There are posters her who believe public shaming is a good thing. I'm NOT one of them. With John77--not illegal.

Not sure why the "HOA" would be r esosibile for a potential defamation lawsuit, when just a lone board member sent list. Did the director say it was sent "on behalf of the Board" of some such?
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Not illegal and some HOA's do this. I don't like it but the HOA can release this information. My preference is to just deal with the member who is behind directly but let the entire HOA know the OVERALL collection rate. We never talked about people but referred to their Lot#'s on who was behind or status. However, if someone was to ask for the HOA financial records each individual status would be there. So it's not really that private.

BTW: HOA's have no need nor requirement to have a members social security # which play into many things like collections and some acts...

Former HOA President
AugustinD
Posts: 5,144
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ChrisE8 on 11/01/2020 10:01 AM
1. Wouldn't the state law equivalent of the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act prohibit this, as it's effectively using shaming to get people to pay?
2. Wouldn't the HOA be potentially liable for a defamation lawsuit if the info is incorrect?
If the statements about Owners who are delinquent are fact, then this is not defamation.

Here's some discussion of when HOAs may face a charge of a violation of Fair Debt Collections laws:

https://barrowhoffman.com/homeowners-association/should-hoas-publish-a-list-of-delinquent-owners/

Attorneys on the net appear to generally advise against publicizing the names of delinquent owners, for numerous reasons. ChrisE8's NC HOA Board sounds not so bright.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Personally, I believe in Public Shaming but I can understand the reasons not to.
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
You're correct - sorry John, but this IS a violation of the fair debt collections act (a federal law). It's one thing if your neighbor is contacted because the creditor is looking for you, but they CANNOT say They're trying to find you regarding a debt, how much you owe, or that they represent X collection agency unless your neighbor asks for identification. They can't contact a third party (neighbir, former employer or otherwise ) more than once, unless the contact information the party provided was incomplete or inaccurate.

If any of this happens, the homeowners can file a complaint with their state Consumer protection agency (usually part of the attorney general's office), and they should also notify the Federal trade commission. The TTC doesn't handle individual complaints, but if a company shows a pattern of violating the law, it can be in for A LOT of trouble.

when I was on my board, this question came up, as some assumed the only applied to debt collection agencies. Our attorney (whose family ran a debt collection agency) good us otherwise. His background in the area was a big reason we hired him because we were getting more aggressive in action against delinquent homeowners, but we didn't want that to bite us in the behind.

Your board member has put the entire community at risk and I don't care if all those people owe the money. This issue has been discussed in this website before and I've yet to see any example of the HOA getting its money after someone appeared on some sort of deadbeat list. Some argue that homeowners have a right to know whose not paying their fair share, and considering the five years I spent as treasurer wrestling with this stuff, I was tempted to agree. However, lawsuits by the state and the feds is not my idea of fun, especially since we were already spending thousands of dollars in attorney's fees, court costs, liens and all that.

Your previous posts, including this one, indicate your community has done serious problems. I don't know if the issue is one board member or the entire bunch, but what is like to know is what's YOUR next mive? Sure, you aren't delinwuent, but if those homeowners decide to take legal action against the association, the results won't be pretty and You will also be affevted, even if you don't live there. You really need to stop with what appears to be indifference on your (hey, I get my rent on time, so what's the problem)?

Most people hate living in chaos, owner of tenter, and mess among the homeowners may prompt the renters to get the Hellboy - why should they pay to live in this And the landlord seems clueless or just doesn't care. Consider your involvement a great way to keep a coder eye on your investment. Maybe you'll learn more about your neighbors in the process.

Start with going to a board meeting and asking the board, point blank if they were aware this was illegal. Go to the TTC website and gather information on the law and show it to them. Then ask that board member what was his or her purpose in doing this.

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
ChrisE8
Posts: 454
Posted:
Thanks. The board member didn't say that the email was on behalf of the HOA, but the email was sent from the board member's email account used for HOA matters, and the email said, "this months' list of dead-beats" (sic).
AugustinD
Posts: 5,144
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By SheliaH on 11/01/2020 12:48 PM
You're correct - sorry John, but this IS a violation of the fair debt collections act (a federal law).
I am not convinced. By my reading, if the HOA hired a debt collector (like a specialized law firm or a company that does debt collection), and the debt collector publicized the names of delinquent owners, then a violation of the federal fair debt collections statute occurs. It looks like generally, a HOA pursuing, on its own without a hired gun, a debt owed is not subject to the federal statute.
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
Ug, thunder thumbs on the tablet strike again, but I think everyone understands what I was getting at. If not - homeowners will scream, holler and cuss each other and the board out over this, recalls will ensue (and I think this board member should be recalled and issue a public apology), along with lawsuits or threats thereof and no one wants to come home from a hard days work to see police next door because an argument over all this got out of hand.

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
Ug, thunder thumbs on the tablet strike again, but I think everyone understands what I was getting at. If not - homeowners will scream, holler and cuss each other and the board out over this, recalls will ensue (and I think this board member should be recalled and issue a public apology), along with lawsuits or threats thereof and no one wants to come home from a hard days work to see police next door because an argument over all this got out of hand.

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
AugustinD
Posts: 5,144
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ChrisE8 on 11/01/2020 12:48 PM
Thanks. The board member didn't say that the email was on behalf of the HOA, but the email was sent from the board member's email account used for HOA matters, and the email said, "this months' list of dead-beats" (sic).
God help this Board member, the Board and the HOA if it turns out any these "dead-beat" Owners turn out not to be delinquent but instead, had their HOA accounts get caught up in some kind of mistake by the HOA.
AugustinD
Posts: 5,144
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By SheliaH on 11/01/2020 12:48 PM
This issue has been discussed in this website before and I've yet to see any example of the HOA getting its money after someone appeared on some sort of deadbeat list.
Reports on the net indicate likewise: Public shaming is largely ineffective in getting folks to pay up.

Quote:
Posted By SheliaH on 11/01/2020 12:48 PM

Your previous posts, including this one, indicate your community has done serious problems. I don't know if the issue is one board member or the entire bunch, but what is like to know is what's YOUR next mive? Sure, you aren't delinwuent, but if those homeowners decide to take legal action against the association, the results won't be pretty and You will also be affevted, even if you don't live there. You really need to stop with what appears to be indifference on your (hey, I get my rent on time, so what's the problem)?
I thought the OP said he is aiming to sell this unit.

I figure the OP is rightly looking for even more reasons to sell.

If some of these NC HOA Owners are not able to pay on account of, say, losing their jobs during the pandemic, I hope I would be among the first in the community to raise my hand on their behalf and offer help. Why? The OP had me at "dead-beats."
ChrisE8
Posts: 454
Posted:
Thanks. Yes, I got an offer pretty quickly once I put the property on the market and in three weeks, I will be done with this HOA.
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
As treasurer I would stress over and over that if people had legitimate reasons they'd fallen behind like job loss, please come to the board so we could work something out. Usually they'd give the details to our property manager is rather they come to the board so we could work something out. We knew it could be scary and embarrassing to call behind so We would consider the person's situation and payment history. Usually we could come to an agreement as long as the person made a good faith effort to pay.

There was a time people HATED to be in debt and they were scared others would find out, especially if the sheriff showed up and out your things on the street. There isn't a lot of that today - instead, people come with a thousand excuses and get away with it. That's why I really do understand the idea behind a deadbeat list, but you're correct that If you're wrong, God help you.

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
AugustinD
Posts: 5,144
Posted:
On the one hand --
Quote:
Posted By SheliaH on 11/01/2020 1:20 PM
There was a time people HATED to be in debt and they were scared others would find out, especially if the sheriff showed up and out your things on the street. There isn't a lot of that today - instead, people come with a thousand excuses and get away with it.
On the other hand, I am sure we all know many well-off people who have declared personal bankruptcy. Donald Trump never did, but his 'hotels and casino businesses have declared bankruptcy six times between 1991 and 2009 due to their inability to meet required payments and to re-negotiate debt with banks, owners of stock and bonds and various small businesses (unsecured creditors).'

I agree people's values today are not what they were in the 1960s and 1970s, when it comes to personal debt.

On the third hand, when assessments have to go up because a third or so of Owners are not paying, well grrrr. This was the case in a humble HOA of 2000+ homes where I once lived.
ChrisE8
Posts: 454
Posted:
The delinquency list was dated September 30, 2020 so I doubt it's current.

Brilliant move by the board member.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
As others have said, it is allowed.
The fair debt collectors act doesn't apply as the HOA is not a debt collector, they are the debtor.

As others have said, I don't agree with it and never did it when I served on the board.

Sometimes it works, often it does not.
It will always create issues within the community.
GeorgeS21 (Florida)
Posts: 3,808
Posted:
In one of my HOAs we discuss how many in arrears each board meeting. At times we vote to refer accounts to counsel for collection by address - addresses easy to cross with county records - and, we always note the amount.
MarkM19 (Texas)
Posts: 1,459
Posted:
Chris,
I think many board members have feelings on both sides of this debate. I personally hate owners that don't pay their dues. I first started on my Ca. just after 2008 and that was when the housing crisis hit Ca. hard. It drove me crazy that people were not paying. I understand about hard times and what I have always said to anyone who listened. If it came down to paying a credit card payment to a bank or paying my dues I think I would prefer to stiff the bank than my neighbors. If a group of homeowners don't pay the bills for the HOA don't stop. It is up to the good payers to pay more.

I had wanted to do something about collections and never did anything like you mentioned in your original pose. What I may have suggested is a strong note from the board with the numbers of homes behind and noticing them that if they have not contacted the HOA and made payment plans the names would be sent to all in 30 or 60 days. This gives them notice and a chance to make arraignment's.
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
As some others have noted, it's not particularly effective and we never did it in my community (we treated collection activities as confidential). If people got curious, I referred them to our county's web site where info about liens is published.

However, I am sympathetic to a board that is trying to pay the bills with limited funds that are often grudgingly supplied, and the deadbeats don't seem to have any problems with letting their neighbors make up the difference.

It costs the association money to go after the non-payers. Publishing a list is free. Paying the lawyer to file liens and do other collection activities is not free, and the neighbors who are already having to shoulder a disproportionate share of the costs are getting to pay even more for the privilege. I can see why a board would want to try all of the free options first on the chance that it may shake a few dollars loose.

I'm also of two minds about keeping delinquency details confidential, assuming state law or CC&Rs are silent about it. On one hand, you don't want to cause problems for a community if you can avoid it. On the other hand, it isn't the board that's creating the problems, it's the deadbeats themselves. They aren't just neighbors, they are financial partners. I personally don't care about my neighbors' social obligations and who is or isn't doing what. I do very much care if my neighbors are stiffing me, and that's what's happening if they don't pay their assessments.

You can make a case that owners are actually entitled to this information. Even more so if the CC&Rs allow individual owners to take legal action against those who are violating the CC&Rs - because failing to pay assessments is a violation.
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
If getting the money because of bad publicity or the threat thereof, I suppose another approach would be to send a notice to everyone saying effective X date, the board will begin publishing a quarterly list of delinquent homeowners. For example, if this went live Jan. 1, delinquent homeowners would have until Dec. 31 to bring their accounts up to date or enter into a written payment plan with the association (those people won't be listed).

When we had a newsletter, it listed total numbers - X number of accounts are 30, 45 and 60 days or more late and the total amount owed from each group. There would also be a reminder that these homeowners would have to reimburse the association's legal expenses incurred in collecting the debt, and the number of people who'd been sued or had liens against their property.

For us, this worked better than disclosing names because people knew the association was serious about collecting the debt. At that time, about a third of the homeowners were delinquent anyway and I suspect people knew who was who because they had other bad habits no one liked. We never had anyone call asking for names - if that happened and they weren't swayed by our attorney's opinion, I might have said "if you want specifics, I'll tell you how much is owed on each account and if you're willing to pay one or more of them, I'll let you know who the homeowners are as soon as your check clears (good luck on getting your money back). That may also work as an option, but once again, public shaming doesn't seem to work in this arena anymore.

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here