Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 10/12/2020 8:36 AM
In my HOA the BOD can raise the Yearly Dues as much as they want to. I repeat, as much as they want to. There is a procedure to how it must be done and it can only be done once a year. 10% of the owners can call for a Special Meeting (within 30 days) to disapprove the new amount but 51% of all owners, I repeat 51% all owners, must vote against the increase. If they do, then the dues are automatically increased via the CPI which I believe is about 2 to 3%.
I understand lawmakers' good intentions: after all, it's the homeowners' money.
Where things go wrong:
* Board members have a fiduciary duty to act in the best interest of their association. Individual homeowners do not - they're free to act in their own self interests, even when those interests conflict with those of the community as a whole.
* As I'd mentioned before, most folks aren't terribly good at personal finance, let alone association finance which is significantly more complicated. Allowing people to make decisions without the skills needed to make good ones is asking for trouble.
* Boards can't be held accountable for decisions they don't control. This undermines the rationale for having a corporate structure (and also removes one of the homeowners' tools for holding boards to account when things go wrong).
I would not buy in an association that allows homeowners to override financial decisions like this, and I especially would not serve on a board where I could be hung out to dry over others' poor decisions.
I know we often complain around here about dysfunctional associations, but frankly I'm surprised that they work as well as they do, given how many obstacles they have to overcome.