💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

DavidG45 (Delaware)
Posts: 994
Posted:
We are a very new community, about halfway into a 650 planned site, still under developer control. The current ARC regulations specify no fence or boundary line hedges can be taller than four feet, and the only fences allowed are white, vinyl, split rail.

We have a new section being built, and the homes' back yards face a fairly well traveled highway. Some of the new residents have asked that our rules allow them to build privacy fences and tall hedge rows to create both a sound and sight barrier to that road.

My opinion is that we can easily specify the lots to which such an exception would apply, and that our residents would be fine with it. Further, since the purpose of an HOA is to improve our quality of life, this would absolutely be in our best interest. But our property manager and members of the ARC insist it can't be done, because you can't make rules that apply only to certain areas. Having lived on a golf course community where homes on the golf course had different requirements than homes that don't face the golf course, I don't believe that is the case. I think we can absolutely have a different set of landscaping rules for a specific set of homes for a specific stated reason.

Am I off base here?

(Possibly relevant background information. Our Declarations were not thoughtfully put together, so these rules don't represent some grand philosophy of the planned community. The developer's law firm basically just copied them from another community and did a search and replace of the community's name. In a couple of places they even missed it, and we have forms that refer to the wrong community name. So nobody is emotionally attached to the rules as they are.)
AugustinD
Posts: 5,144
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DavidG45 on 09/25/2020 12:36 PM
So nobody is emotionally attached to the rules as they are.)
If what you are calling "rules" are actually listed in the Declaration, then these are not rules but are insted, covenants. Maybe people are not 'emotionally attached' to these covenants, but they are contractually bound by them. To change a covenant will require following the procedure given in the Declaration.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
David

It is not uncommon to have different fences rules/guidelines depending on the home's location. Corner lots are usually one major difference especially when a driver visibility issue. Pond/water view fences are often different so as not to block the view. Homes backing up to commercial property, streets, woods, etc. usually have different guidelines typically allowing higher, privacy type fences.
GenoS (Florida)
Posts: 4,276
Posted:
I agree that it's not uncommon to have different rules and restrictions for different sections of the property. Ideally, I think they should be spelled out clearly in the CC&Rs (e.g. Declaration of Covenants).
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
As others have said, if the restriction is in the covenants, the covenants must be amended.

If the restriction is in guideline, previously adopted by the board, then the board can change it.
Typically, the committee can only make recommendations to the board to change the guidelines.

Contrary to your stated perceived purpose (an HOA is to improve the quality of life) the only spelled out purpose of an HOA is to maintain the common area, the common elements and to provide any services outlined in the governing documents. The HOA, like any owner, also has the authority to enforce the covenants.

CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
Many builders/developers put privacy walls along busy roads. In fact the lots bordering such a road can be called "impaired lots" - they're less attractive to buyers and often have to be sold at a discount. As the OP noted, it's in the best interest of the community as a whole to muffle sound, increase privacy and security, and keep property values up.

Since you're still under developer control, I think it would be worth a discussion with him. If the CC&Rs need to be amended, you probably the necessary votes. And in my mind it's questionable whether the restriction on fencing would even apply to a sound barrier since it serves a somewhat different function.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here