Quote:
Posted By CathyA3 on 07/31/2020 5:41 AM
... snippage ...
An interesting question: would this sort of external relationship be prohibited on other boards of directors? If so, then this tells us that it is a potential problem that should be disclosed, at the very least.
Ha!
https://www.imd.org/research-knowledge/articles/the-four-tiers-of-conflict-of-interest-faced-by-board-directors/
Quote:
"Tier-II conflicts arise when a board member’s duty of loyalty to stakeholders or the company is compromised. This would happen when certain board members exercise influence over the others through compensation, favors, a relationship, or psychological manipulation. Even though some directors describe themselves as “independent of management, company, or major shareholders,” they may find themselves faced with a conflict of interest if they are forced into agreeing with a dominant board member. Under particular circumstances, some independent directors form a distinct stakeholder group and only demonstrate loyalty to the members of that group. They tend to represent their own interest rather than the interests of the companies."
So yes, two board members who have an outside relationship such as boss/employee do, in fact, have a conflict of interest.
Having said that, we often see "cliques" forming among directors, or one director calling the shots while others don't push back. According to the quote about, this is also an issue even though there isn't any obvious financial advantage at stake.