GeorgeS21 (Florida)
Posts: 3,808
Posts: 3,808
Posted:
Hi All,
One of my HOAs (319 single family) has an owner who is now behind in assessments by about 18 months ~$2500 total, with about 35% of that being attorney fees.
We turned the account over to our attorney and it has been in process for about 9 months, including the usual Florida based requirements for notice and response. Notice of Intent to Lien occurred on Nov 18, 2019, property lien was recorded Jan 13, 2020, and the response period for Notice of Intent to Foreclose (Feb 3, 2020) has run out (we allowed additional time due to C19), so we are preparing to foreclose - Final Demand Letter went out on Jun 17, 2020.
At no point during the process has the owner responded to any of the USPS letters, or registered/certified letters (the owner refused them) - sent by either the management company, or our attorney.
While I insisted and the Board voted unanimously to support actions last year, as âprocessâ in such cases - the terminology we used in the minute is, âcollect debts in excess of one yearâs assessment using any and all legal means,â our attorney has advised us to address this particular property specifically and to authorize a lawsuit related to the ownerâs failure to pay assessments. I think this is a reasonable thing, as it removes any doubt as to whether we have addressed this per law. It obviously provides notice to the Board of what is about to occur, as well. First time this has happened in the neighborhood.
Once we approve this at the Board meeting, and provide draft minutes of the meeting authorizing a lawsuit, my sense is the first thing the should happen is to determine what is owed on the property by the owner - and especially to ensure they are not behind in mortgage payments, then we can compare the value of the property to the amount owed, to determine if we will be paid, once the property is foreclosed.
Does this sound generally correct in process flow?
We donât want to do this, but have been careful to follow process - and, to allow additional time. The owner refusing notice is of concern ...
One of my HOAs (319 single family) has an owner who is now behind in assessments by about 18 months ~$2500 total, with about 35% of that being attorney fees.
We turned the account over to our attorney and it has been in process for about 9 months, including the usual Florida based requirements for notice and response. Notice of Intent to Lien occurred on Nov 18, 2019, property lien was recorded Jan 13, 2020, and the response period for Notice of Intent to Foreclose (Feb 3, 2020) has run out (we allowed additional time due to C19), so we are preparing to foreclose - Final Demand Letter went out on Jun 17, 2020.
At no point during the process has the owner responded to any of the USPS letters, or registered/certified letters (the owner refused them) - sent by either the management company, or our attorney.
While I insisted and the Board voted unanimously to support actions last year, as âprocessâ in such cases - the terminology we used in the minute is, âcollect debts in excess of one yearâs assessment using any and all legal means,â our attorney has advised us to address this particular property specifically and to authorize a lawsuit related to the ownerâs failure to pay assessments. I think this is a reasonable thing, as it removes any doubt as to whether we have addressed this per law. It obviously provides notice to the Board of what is about to occur, as well. First time this has happened in the neighborhood.
Once we approve this at the Board meeting, and provide draft minutes of the meeting authorizing a lawsuit, my sense is the first thing the should happen is to determine what is owed on the property by the owner - and especially to ensure they are not behind in mortgage payments, then we can compare the value of the property to the amount owed, to determine if we will be paid, once the property is foreclosed.
Does this sound generally correct in process flow?
We donât want to do this, but have been careful to follow process - and, to allow additional time. The owner refusing notice is of concern ...