SteveB25 (Arizona)
Posts: 77
Posts: 77
Posted:
A recent reserve study was performed for our HOA which I take issue with.
I have reviewed several reserve studies of our HOA. And, I have looked over dozens of reserve studies performed for other HOAs. I have found a common trend in professionally prepared reserve studies is that they all excluded annual dues and operational expenses. In all the cases that have seen, the reserve study practitioners derive the fully funded balance of the reserve components and compare that FFB to the current reserve fund balance to compute the current percent funding. All fine so far. Then the reserve practitioner typically assumes that the HOA should be 100% funded and declares that the HOA is either under or over funded. Generally under funded. They then provide a reserve contribution rate and declare their job done.
My goodness. This practice borders on total incompetence. By excluding operational expenses and annual dues incomes, one can never create a credible capital budgeting plan. And thinking that an HOA needs to be 100% funded ignores the principal objective of the reserve fund, which is to have enough money to cover reserve expenses when those reserve components require maintenance or replacement. I see too often where HOAs and reserve study service providers imply that the only way to safely achieve that objective is maintain 100% funding ... which is entirely false.
Would love to hear from others on this.
What has been your experience with reserve study service providers?
Did you prepare a long term capital budgeting plan? How did you account for operational expenses and annual dues incomes?
Did your reserve study service provider accurately include all reserve components? Did they include components that should not have been included?
In your HOA, did you target 100% funding? Or did you establish a lower percent funding target, for example 70% funding?
My personal observation is that an HOA can likely do a better job of performing a reserve study themselves versus using a outside provider. This, of course, assumes that the HOA makes it a goal to understand the principals of sound capital planning. Most will not and therefore they are at the mercy of reserve study service providers and many of them are incompetent and nearly all of them take the easy way out performing financial analysis by excluding dues income and operational expenses.
Love to hear from you all.
I have reviewed several reserve studies of our HOA. And, I have looked over dozens of reserve studies performed for other HOAs. I have found a common trend in professionally prepared reserve studies is that they all excluded annual dues and operational expenses. In all the cases that have seen, the reserve study practitioners derive the fully funded balance of the reserve components and compare that FFB to the current reserve fund balance to compute the current percent funding. All fine so far. Then the reserve practitioner typically assumes that the HOA should be 100% funded and declares that the HOA is either under or over funded. Generally under funded. They then provide a reserve contribution rate and declare their job done.
My goodness. This practice borders on total incompetence. By excluding operational expenses and annual dues incomes, one can never create a credible capital budgeting plan. And thinking that an HOA needs to be 100% funded ignores the principal objective of the reserve fund, which is to have enough money to cover reserve expenses when those reserve components require maintenance or replacement. I see too often where HOAs and reserve study service providers imply that the only way to safely achieve that objective is maintain 100% funding ... which is entirely false.
Would love to hear from others on this.
What has been your experience with reserve study service providers?
Did you prepare a long term capital budgeting plan? How did you account for operational expenses and annual dues incomes?
Did your reserve study service provider accurately include all reserve components? Did they include components that should not have been included?
In your HOA, did you target 100% funding? Or did you establish a lower percent funding target, for example 70% funding?
My personal observation is that an HOA can likely do a better job of performing a reserve study themselves versus using a outside provider. This, of course, assumes that the HOA makes it a goal to understand the principals of sound capital planning. Most will not and therefore they are at the mercy of reserve study service providers and many of them are incompetent and nearly all of them take the easy way out performing financial analysis by excluding dues income and operational expenses.
Love to hear from you all.