šŸ’¬ Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚔ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

MaddyS (Texas)
Posts: 28
Posted:
I am new to the board but experienced in the accounting field.

After joining the board I found out that the MC writes and signs ALL checks for operation and reserve accounts. There are no limits to the dollar amounts for which they can write checks. No dual signatures as prescribed in our bylaws.
The association has never had an external audit (in the works now), and the only reconciliations and financials were prepared by the MC and never really reviewed by the board. The association does not receive copies of the bank statements, except those provided through the MC.

As a CFE, this makes me cringe. The other board members do not understand fraud risk and will not listen about it, putting 100% trust in the MC.
The MC is giving me pushback saying I am micromanaging and that dual signatures are antiquated. I disagree completely.

Again, as a CFE this sends up giant red flags. Maybe there’s nothing wrong, but why the intense pushback?

Has anyone successfully convinced their board that anti-fraud measures are necessary? And how did you do it?
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Why is it fraud and criminal? Can't it just be lazy board whom don't want to be involved in the book keeping? HOA's hire MC's because many just are too overwhelmed by the process they figure hire someone else to do it. So what your dealing with isn't fraud but a culture issue with a HOA board who doesn't want to bother with the "details".

I kind do have to agree to a point with the 2 signature system. We use it. However, we had to buy special checks/ledger book to do it. It was quite expensive. Plus find that many banks do not necessarily verify the signatures on the checks. We had the Treasurer/accounting firm cut the check/sign and then 2 signatory board members sign every check. That was after approval by the board to spend money that wasn't regular bills. (Regular bills same signing method but not subject to scrutiny).

We were open HOA so it wasn't a big deal. Bills got paid as long as we had the money. Our accountant just verified a vote was taken and approved prior to writing/signing any checks for us to sign. I actually mailed the checks after getting the 2 signatures. The Accountant provided the envelop with address/stamp to mail.

Former HOA President
AugustinD
Posts: 5,144
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MaddyS on 05/06/2020 7:37 PM
The association has never had an external audit (in the works now)
If you mean that an external audit is taking place right now, then in my (granted pretty limited) experience chances are high that the CPA-auditor is going to make many recommendations that answer well your concerns. I would wait until the audit is completed and the board has reviewed the report. If the board does not follow the recommendations, they are damned fools and you may want to consider resigning. Embezzlement happens often enough at HOAs (and is often reported by the media) that the board must take this seriously. Also FWIW, I do not like the setup your HOA has (where the MC is signing checks et cetera) one bit.
GeorgeS21 (Florida)
Posts: 3,808
Posted:
Never reviewed by the board?

Pretty broad statement ... was there no treasurer? Was no one providing oversight? Was there a treasurer?

Maybe I’m not understanding?
MaddyS (Texas)
Posts: 28
Posted:
I think you misread my post. I’m not saying it’s fraud. Fraud prevention is a protocol to do just that -Limit exposure to instances of fraud. The providers I outlined are the current (insufficient) practices that leave gaping holes in terms of opportunity.

Policies and procedures to prevent fraud are very important. Selling these policies to a board that does not appreciate the exposure they have allowed by lax oversight is difficult.

I’m looking for advice as to how others have sold fraud prevention measures to their boards.
MaddyS (Texas)
Posts: 28
Posted:
The treasurer was in title only. They couldn’t even read financials and never even spot checked the registers.

The quarterly financials were approved by the board after a quick skim.

Part of the big reason I took the position.
MarshallT (New York)
Posts: 414
Posted:
Hi Maddy,

If the rest of the board isn't interested, it may be a very hard sell. Are you able to speak with a lawyer? Perhaps he or she could be of help and advise on how you can encourage the other members to adopt smarter financial practices.
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
Certified fraud examiner and they still won't listen to you?? This is why some people REALLY need to stay as far away from a HOA board as possible. They may be nice people, but have no business sense whatsoever, and running a HOA is akin to running a business, even though it's a non-profit.

Some of my co-workers are CFEs and I've read articles from the ACFE magazine - maybe they need to read a few and see that fraud can happen anywhere to anyone at any time. By the time people figure out what's going on, thousands of dollars are gone and often, the victim never gets the money back.

Better yet, Google HOA embezzlement and take your pick of stories they can see - they should range from rouge HOA board members to property managers. While you're at it, push as hard as you can for a a new property manager - the fact this one says dual signatures are old school is very scary.

I bet these folks haven't done an audit - maybe for grins (or not) you can suggest an independent audit to ensure everything's in order. If they're so trusting in this property manager, an audit shouldn't find any issues, but if it does......

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
ND (PA)
Posts: 792
Posted:
It's gotta be sheer laziness, absolute stupidity, and/or complete ignorance on the part of your other board members that have them burying their heads in the sand, unwilling to even listen to your POV.

Like Sheila said . . . there are plenty of lessons learned out there from other HOAs. Pick a few, synopsize each, and present those as examples of what can easily happen without proper checks and balances.

Like AugustinD said . . . let the audit run it's course and I'm sure many of the auditor's findings/recommendations will be ones that are the same as yours (assuming this auditor is an unbiased outside party).

Finally, it may help to simplify your info/ideas as much as possible so it can be easily digested by your Board Members. I could see a bulletized list of common fraud protection practices, another column explaining why it is done, and a third column with a check mark indicating that your HOA does (or does not) do this.
ND (PA)
Posts: 792
Posted:
I meant to add . . . as a new board member, I suggest you be in the info-collecting phase for a short while, and perhaps cautiously make recommendations, but being too forceful now will cast you as a trouble-maker and one that does not work well with others. It will probably be tough and cringe-worthy for you, but take a bit of time to ease into things. Right now, you're 1 person versus the rest of the Board and MC . . . they can easily stand in your way completely if you go at this too hard from the get-go. Good luck.
AustinH (Utah)
Posts: 1
Posted:
Hello Maddy - my team and I have been working on an app to solve for this very problem which a) gives control and visibility to board members while b) automating accounts payables approvals for management companies.

As a CFE, you are an expert in your field and I would love to get your expert opinion. Our app is still in beta, but someone like you could really help us shape the future of our solution so others don’t have to experience the potential problems of exposure to fraud.

Any interest in taking 15-20 minutes to give us your feedback?
GeorgeS21 (Florida)
Posts: 3,808
Posted:
What?

Advertising?
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
AustinH look at the Posting rules here. We don't do what your selling...

Former HOA President
GeorgeS21 (Florida)
Posts: 3,808
Posted:
Do e chance this has been the intent?
GeorgeS21 (Florida)
Posts: 3,808
Posted:
Some chance ...
MaddyS (Texas)
Posts: 28
Posted:
Sheila, I was thinking of doing just that (presenting past cases). The other members are quite intent on opposing anything I propose but I managed to get the audit proposal approved (though they would only approve the auditor suggested by the MC), and I was able to form a finance committee.
MaddyS (Texas)
Posts: 28
Posted:
I agree with you, but I had to blow that chance during our last board meeting. They privately agreed to forming a finance committee and then tried to refuse a second to my motion during the meeting. I professionally, but strongly, called them out. They finally seconded the motion.
MaddyS (Texas)
Posts: 28
Posted:
Here are fun new pieces of information:

1. The MC first denied and is now dragging their feet giving me online access to the bank accounts (read-only) so I can review statements and transactions directly from the bank. They insist I should rely on the bank statements provided by the MC.

This is fraud prevention 101 - get info straight from the source. And the bank won’t give me any info directly bc the MC manages the accounts.

2. The contracts, proposals, and vendor invoices have not been properly provided to a central document depository where they can be reviewed by board members for YEARS. They were apparently being emailed out piecemeal for approval and never uploaded to a single location, making it impossible for the board to review the books completely.

This is Twilight Zone level. They are about to find out what it’s like to pique the curiosity of a geeky accountant with too much time on her hands.
MarkW18
Posts: 1,290
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MaddyS on 05/07/2020 9:04 PM
Here are fun new pieces of information:

1. The MC first denied and is now dragging their feet giving me online access to the bank accounts (read-only) so I can review statements and transactions directly from the bank. They insist I should rely on the bank statements provided by the MC.

This is fraud prevention 101 - get info straight from the source. And the bank won’t give me any info directly bc the MC manages the accounts.

2. The contracts, proposals, and vendor invoices have not been properly provided to a central document depository where they can be reviewed by board members for YEARS. They were apparently being emailed out piecemeal for approval and never uploaded to a single location, making it impossible for the board to review the books completely.

This is Twilight Zone level. They are about to find out what it’s like to pique the curiosity of a geeky accountant with too much time on her hands.

OUCH!
AugustinD
Posts: 5,144
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MaddyS on 05/07/2020 9:04 PM
1. The MC first denied and is now dragging their feet giving me online access to the bank accounts (read-only) so I can review statements and transactions directly from the bank. They insist I should rely on the bank statements provided by the MC.
By any chance is this MC transferring funds back and forth from its own account to the bank, ostensibly on behalf of your HOA and other HOAs?
Quote:
Posted By MaddyS on 05/07/2020 9:04 PM
This is Twilight Zone level.
I'd call it good signs that there is theft going on.
LaskaS (Texas)
Posts: 1,025
Posted:
Maddy,,

everything you have said strikes me as correct..

just be aware,, you will get majore pushback from those that have a vested interest in not having any checks and balances in place.

No audit ? ever?? omg..

who many many homes are in the hoa?? how much money are we talking about the mc being in control of?
LaskaS (Texas)
Posts: 1,025
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MaddyS on 05/07/2020 8:52 PM
Sheila, I was thinking of doing just that (presenting past cases). The other members are quite intent on opposing anything I propose but I managed to get the audit proposal approved (though they would only approve the auditor suggested by the MC), and I was able to form a finance committee.

i don't like this at all... only agreeing to an audit if the auditor is one that is suggested by the MC.. um,, at the very least this clearly would give rise to concerns about how independent the auditor was.
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MaddyS on 05/07/2020 8:52 PM
Sheila, I was thinking of doing just that (presenting past cases). The other members are quite intent on opposing anything I propose but I managed to get the audit proposal approved (though they would only approve the auditor suggested by the MC), and I was able to form a finance committee.

I suspect your colleagues are beginning to think you're on to something and would rather not admit they may have been bamboozled -otherwise they'd have angry homeowners to answer to. And that's as it should be.

Since they aren't listening to you (yet), start with educating the new committee. Talk to them to see where everyone is, as far as what they know regarding HOW finances. They will need to understand the basics before they can start thinking about the checks and false that should be in place. Keep it simple a d show them the stories to drive home the point of why oversight is important.

Hopefully, these folks will be concerned enough to demand answers of the board and tell the neighbors so they'll chime in. It's one thing to ignore yoy, but get the neighbors missed off enough and they will start calling for changes to be made - or else.

Fasten your seat belt, this is going to be a ride, but you are heading in the right direction. This is what is like to see more board members do - use your experience to help find ways to make the association operate more effectively and educate each other, because no one knows everything. It's ok to say you don't know, but that should be followed up "I will go and find out" and report back. Good luck to you - I see an board officer position in your future....

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
Ew, this tablet - I meant checks and balances.

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
MarkW18
Posts: 1,290
Posted:
A month ago a poster came on and asked for advice on purchasing a condo and attached a three page document which included 2 pages of a income statement and one page of a balance sheet. The balance sheet was off by $260K and no one noticed.

What good are checks and balances when people don't understand association financial reports?

https://www.hoatalk.com/Forum/tabid/55/forumid/1/postid/282208/view/topic/Default.aspx
AugustinD
Posts: 5,144
Posted:
I always thought a main purpose of accounting checks and balances was to help make a system idiot-proof. E.g. requiring two signatures on at least large checks gives more assurance that the expense is proper compared to only one person signing the check. The signers do not have to understand P&L statements or balance sheets.
MarkW18
Posts: 1,290
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AugustinD on 05/08/2020 8:38 AM
I always thought a main purpose of accounting checks and balances was to help make a system idiot-proof. E.g. requiring two signatures on at least large checks gives more assurance that the expense is proper compared to only one person signing the check. The signers do not have to understand P&L statements or balance sheets.

Works for me!
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
Exactly, Mark, and that's why one may need to start there (what are balance sheets vs. income/expense reports, what are reserves and why should an association have one, etc.) Then again, there are people who don't get basic math, which is why their finances tend to be a hot mess. If you don't know how to add, subtract, multiply, divide, and calculate percentages, how will you be able to tell if your money's going where it's supposed to and you have enough of it?

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Our MC collects our dues and makes all payments. Monthly dues are paid to a bank lockbox then transferred to the MC. The BOD has a "key word" they can use to stop any payments to the MC. The MC can deposit to but not withdraw from our Reserve Accounts. It takes two signatures (Pres and myself, VP/Treasurer) to withdraw any funds from our Reserve Accounts. The MC prepares a monthly 40 odd page financial report which is available to any owner that requests such. The BOD President and myself (VP/Treasurer) review it each month.

No matter what procedures one puts in place, cheaters will find a way to cheat
MarkW18
Posts: 1,290
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 05/08/2020 12:00 PM
Our MC collects our dues and makes all payments. Monthly dues are paid to a bank lockbox then transferred to the MC. The BOD has a "key word" they can use to stop any payments to the MC. The MC can deposit to but not withdraw from our Reserve Accounts. It takes two signatures (Pres and myself, VP/Treasurer) to withdraw any funds from our Reserve Accounts. The MC prepares a monthly 40 odd page financial report which is available to any owner that requests such. The BOD President and myself (VP/Treasurer) review it each month.

No matter what procedures one puts in place, cheaters will find a way to cheat

Who signs the checks?
SueW6 (Michigan)
Posts: 814
Posted:

You haven’t mentioned a budget and a standard y-t-d expenditure vs. budget report. Pretty standard stuff.

Unless something is way out of whack, yes, you are micromanaging the financials.

Let the audit play out and see if it points out potential ā€œfraud.ā€

MaddyS (Texas)
Posts: 28
Posted:
Actually, auditors are charged with ensuring to a reasonable degree that financial statements are free of materials misstatements, not detecting instances of fraud. In fact, according to the 2019 Report to the Nations from the ACFE, only 4% of fraud is detected as a result of an independent audit.

Budgets and expense reports exist, and will be examined, but that is not the topic I am addressing here. Improprieties are not always obvious. I can show you a hundred ways to make a good looking balance sheet with completely bogus information.
MaddyS (Texas)
Posts: 28
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AugustinD on 05/07/2020 9:21 PM
Posted By MaddyS on 05/07/2020 9:04 PM
By any chance is this MC transferring funds back and forth from its own account to the bank, ostensibly on behalf of your HOA and other HOAs?
Posted By MaddyS on 05/07/2020 9:04 PM
This is Twilight Zone level.
I'd call it good signs that there is theft going on.

I haven't seen any evidence of transfers to/from the MC. It's a giant, well-known company, so I am working under the (skeptical) assumption their internal controls would not allow for such things.

I don't want to be accusatory and say there are any improper actions. But I was trained to approach every situation with constructive skepticism, and being so standoffish about divulging information to which I have a legal right is definitely worrisome.
MaddyS (Texas)
Posts: 28
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AugustinD on 05/08/2020 8:38 AM
I always thought a main purpose of accounting checks and balances was to help make a system idiot-proof. E.g. requiring two signatures on at least large checks gives more assurance that the expense is proper compared to only one person signing the check. The signers do not have to understand P&L statements or balance sheets.

Correct. The signers technically don't need to understand financials, but the dual signatures is to protect against a single individual signing checks to inappropriate parties. That would take collusion between at least two people. Just another checks and balances measure that's on the simple side to implement.
MaddyS (Texas)
Posts: 28
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 05/08/2020 12:00 PM
No matter what procedures one puts in place, cheaters will find a way to cheat

Your process is very similar to ours, except there are no dual signatures, the MC withdraws however much from whatever account they deem necessary, and no one has been reviewing the financials.

True, but instead of mitigating the opportunities, we have just left the door wide open.
MarkW18
Posts: 1,290
Posted:
Thanks for the great insight.

I think the obvious next step would be for you to suggest to the Board that they become self managed and then you could set up you very own fraud/internal mechanisms that would be fool proof.
MaddyS (Texas)
Posts: 28
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MarkW18 on 05/08/2020 12:17 PM
Posted By JohnC46 on 05/08/2020 12:00 PM

Who signs the checks?

The MC signs the checks now, or if we specifically request a check be sent to us, a single member of the Board will sign it.
MaddyS (Texas)
Posts: 28
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MarkW18 on 05/08/2020 1:45 PM
Thanks for the great insight.

I think the obvious next step would be for you to suggest to the Board that they become self managed and then you could set up you very own fraud/internal mechanisms that would be fool proof.

I don't think I want that kind of headache being self-managed when the Board can't seem to handle it with the help of an MC. A MC is a great tool for such a large community (>600 homes). I'm hoping in the coming year we can make the switch to a different company with more up to date approaches.

It would be a conflict of interest for me to develop the fraud prevention plan, but hopefully I can convince them to adopt some of the measures to mitigation the issues. If I could come up with foolproof internal controls, I'd be a very rich woman.
GeorgeS21 (Florida)
Posts: 3,808
Posted:
Why would it be a COI?
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MarkW18 on 05/08/2020 12:17 PM
Posted By JohnC46 on 05/08/2020 12:00 PM
Our MC collects our dues and makes all payments. Monthly dues are paid to a bank lockbox then transferred to the MC. The BOD has a "key word" they can use to stop any payments to the MC. The MC can deposit to but not withdraw from our Reserve Accounts. It takes two signatures (Pres and myself, VP/Treasurer) to withdraw any funds from our Reserve Accounts. The MC prepares a monthly 40 odd page financial report which is available to any owner that requests such. The BOD President and myself (VP/Treasurer) review it each month.

No matter what procedures one puts in place, cheaters will find a way to cheat


Who signs the checks?

The MC.
BarbaraT1 (Texas)
Posts: 821
Posted:
It’s common for management companies to sign checks for the associations they manage.

Few board members are willing to drive the management office several times a month to sign checks. Check processing houses don’t bother looking for two signatures. It’s a pain to change names on the account with the bank every time there’s a change on the board.

It’s the board’s responsibility to review the financials and understand what they mean. There’s a GL entry for irrigation repair? Where’s the invoice for that? Where’s the work order for that? Does the work order have photos? Is there an email chain showing a leak reported and repairs requested.

You don’t have to do that for every invoice every month but at least spot check once in a while.

I have worked for several large management companies. Typically their internal controls are to have the manager submit invoices, AP specialist review it, confirm we have a W9 and COI for the vendor, and pass it on to the accountant who authorizes payments. If it’s over $10k, an accounting VP might need to review it too. But the big companies might have a dozen accountants and 2 AP specialists for 800 properties so things slip through the cracks.

Just google HOA embezzlement and you’ll find lots of examples. It does happen and you’re not paranoid to worry about it. Nothing wrong with regular audits - although those might simply confirm that the numbers you gave them add up correctly.

The best defense against fraud is an attentive, involved board. There shouldn’t be any expenses the board didn’t know about ahead of time or can’t confirm after the fact.
MaddyS (Texas)
Posts: 28
Posted:
So well said. Thank you. Insight from the MC side is always appreciated.
MaddyS (Texas)
Posts: 28
Posted:
Just wanted to add a quick note to thank you all for your responses, advice, and insights. I appreciate you taking the time and talking things out with me.
BarbaraT1 (Texas)
Posts: 821
Posted:
I’m also going to add - management company resistance isn’t necessarily evidence of malfeasance. The larger MCs are factories. They provide a set of services their way and asking for something outside the norm is like calling for a halt to the production line to make a custom product. They hate doing it. You’ll need a very determined manager willing to push back against their employer in order to fight for you and good luck with that.

AugustinD
Posts: 5,144
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BarbaraT1 on 05/09/2020 10:00 AM
It’s common for management companies to sign checks for the associations they manage.
It's common for only the HOA treasurer and one other to sign checks as well. Particularly in condominiums where there is an office for the manager. Of the three HOAs in which I have resided, never did the management company sign the checks.

Let's also be clear here: BarbaraT1, isn't it true your company stopped managing condominiums because condominiums are inherently more complicated?
BarbaraT1 (Texas)
Posts: 821
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AugustinD on 05/09/2020 11:16 AM
Posted By BarbaraT1 on 05/09/2020 10:00 AM
It’s common for management companies to sign checks for the associations they manage.
It's common for only the HOA treasurer and one other to sign checks as well. Particularly in condominiums where there is an office for the manager. Of the three HOAs in which I have resided, never did the management company sign the checks.

Let's also be clear here: BarbaraT1, isn't it true your company stopped managing condominiums because condominiums are inherently more complicated?

No,but isn’t true. I personally refuse to manage condos but don’t own a management company and the companies I have worked for manage condos. And I refuse to manage condos not because they are ā€œcomplicatedā€ but because they are more likely to have difficult board members among lots of other reasons I have enumerated here many times.

In any case, my response to the OP about management companies signing checks was simply to let her know that this is a common industry practice and not, in itself, evidence of fraud.

I’m aware that you are worlds most diligent and knowledgeable board member and are of course capable of doing everything the right and proper way.
MarkW18
Posts: 1,290
Posted:
I don't like managing condos either and the company is selectively getting out of that type of HOA.
AugustinD
Posts: 5,144
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BarbaraT1 on 05/09/2020 11:25 AM
In any case, my response to the OP about management companies signing checks was simply to let her know that this is a common industry practice
I do not think this statement is a fair representation of reality at all.
Quote:
Posted By BarbaraT1 on 05/09/2020 11:25 AM
and not, in itself, evidence of fraud.
But it is an easier route for a management company or manager to commit fraud, embezzle, et cetera.
Quote:
Posted By BarbaraT1 on 05/09/2020 11:25 AM
I refuse to manage condos not because they are ā€œcomplicatedā€ but because they are more likely to have difficult board members among lots of other reasons I have enumerated here many times.
You posted on March 2, 2020:
Quote:
Posted By BarbaraT1 on 03/02/2020 12:22 PM
Posted By CathyA3 on 03/02/2020 8:51 AM
I'm also interested in Barbara's take on condos.

From the perspective of someone who has lived in condos, I see the following:

* Higher proportion of common elements vs. personal property plus higher density makes individual owners more at the mercy of neighbors' behavior (vis-Ć -vis delinquent assessments, nuisance behavior, disregard for the rules, etc.).

* Higher rate of turnover, with people moving in and out constantly. This leads to a constant stream of clueless newbies and people who are less invested in their homes since they will be leaving soon.

* Higher rate of investor-owned units, with all of the issues that come with it.

* A more complicated form of ownership compared with single family homes in an HOA, which is ironic since condos seem to attract first-time buyers.



Pretty much this, yes.

I had a lo-o-o-ong answer written out and the board ate it, so I'll do the shorter version which is everything above AND:

In my experience, condos are chronically underfunded, and as a result, chronically poorly maintained. Board members never like raising dues or levying special assessments but condo boards seem especially loathe to do this. Especially when you get an investor on the board who owns multiple units.

And the deferred maintenance in condos has much higher stakes! Staircases, balconies, fire suppression sprinklers, foundations!

Monthly dues means an ongoing collection cycle. You get one owner caught up one month and a new owner is late the next month.

And frankly, condos are very vulnerable to corruption. The most common method of embezzling from an HOA is through maintenance. There are three main schemes: using HOA funds to repair an owner's unit, having the vendor pad an invoice and give a kickback to the board/manager or just plain creating fake companies that do imaginary work on the property. These are all much easier to do with a condo than with a single family HOA because condos have so much more maintenance, a wider variety of maintenance, and the line between owner's property and HOA property is finer. A typical SFH community with no amentieis is going to have five bills a month - anything unusual will be instantly spotted. Condos have an ever changing list of maintenance needs, you can slip just about anything in there.

And in Texas,condo owners have few protections, since condos are not subject to 209. Condo boards don't have to give notice of their meetings and they can use non-judicial foreclosure to collect delinquencies.

In every HOA there are owners who do not understand that the association's only source of income is assessments, that the smaller the community the larger the assessment because MATH. And there are always owners who want to pay nothing but have the property kept pristine by... I guess magic? And who want the freedom to do whatever they want because America! but their neighbors can't make any noise after 6pm. That happens everywhere. But somehow it happens times ten in a condo.

MarkW18
Posts: 1,290
Posted:
Augustin

Actually, it is easier for a self-managed HOA to commit fraud, embezzle, etc. There is little oversight, people don't say anything and the governing body doesn't change.

The real question, what are YOU personally doing to effect change. Offering a few letters to disgruntled homeowners, in my book, just doesn't cut it.

In 2008, I bought into an HOA (first mistake). Like everyone else, didn't read the governing docs. Escrow company didn't know who the management company was, so didn't forward my collected HOA dues. Management took four months to figure I wasn't paying, oops they didn't have a record of a change. Later that year tried to get appointed to the Board. Because of my background, deemed to be a threat.

In 2009, ran for the Board, but lawyer cancelled because the people who voted by mail, by secret ballot weren't present to vote to adjourn.

In 2010, re-wrote the Bylaws, no more quorum for elections, no cumulative voting, no more proxies. Prior to 2010, only one election in which ballots were opened. Since 2010, all ballots opened.

Between 2009-2010 three homeowners, along with management and legal counsel blackmailed a Board to pursue a $250K homeowner to homeowner dispute, which the HOA ended up losing.

From 2011-2015, I learned that, unless homeowners are forced to do something, they don't give a rat's ass about anything.

From 2011 to 2015 I worked for three different management companies, each one worst than the other. Taking shortcuts were the word of the day and who was going to stop them, HOA Boards?

In 2015 I started my own company, which my daughter now runs. Nothing really hasn't changed, except we follow the rules, don't take shortcuts. Our job is to make sure the Association, through our company, complies with state guidelines and is kept up to date with new changes and legislation.

I have dropped HOA's because they felt they didn't need to follow state guidelines and who was I to tell them differently. I let one go because they refused to provide bank statements for their reserve account, it wasn't any of my business. They were quickly given a 30 day notice.

Our mission wasn't about money. It was about educating associations. For the most part, I believe the industry failed.
AugustinD
Posts: 5,144
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MarkW18 on 05/09/2020 12:21 PM
Actually, it is easier for a self-managed HOA to commit fraud, embezzle, etc. There is little oversight, people don't say anything and the governing body doesn't change.
If the choice is binary, such that either a HOA has a manager write and sign the checks, or a HOA has two directors signing each check (let's say over a certain amount requires two signatures), in my opinion the lower risk option is the two directors signing each check.
Quote:
Posted By MarkW18 on 05/09/2020 12:21 PM
The real question, what are YOU personally doing to effect change.
I think one of the biggest problems is that people who come here do not know either the law; how to practically implement the law; or both. To help on both levels, I will continue to offer example letters now and then.

šŸŽÆ You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • āœ“ Ask follow-up questions
  • āœ“ Share your experience
  • āœ“ Get expert advice
  • āœ“ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚔ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here