Double indemnity

Has anyone ever dealt with a Master Association that has lesser requirements (ACC guidelines, enforcing upkeep, etc) that has decided to come and supercede a functioning sub association that has been very successful? The sub association has more strict and successful Architectural Guidelines in place and have complete follow thru.

We understand the concept of the Master, ie if a sub association fails, or no one runs at the turnover then yes they step in. Our documents and rules and regulations are actually more strict than the Masters they have more homes in the outside communities that are not even at the minimum requirement of the Master much less ours. Yet their main goal is to get inside our gates.. Priorities are all screwed up. We own our road, gates, we pay liability insurance, we pay for all upkeep, we are incorporated. We are the only ones that pay two HOA fees all of the other communities pay only the annual fee. Our bylaws are the problem there is not defining statement or if there is we are missing it.