LindaC3 (Florida)
Posts: 526
Posts: 526
Posted:
Good Day Group..... The HOA I reside in is a hunting/equestrian/fly in gated rural community.....Fenced....One way in one way out....on duty guard attendant 7-7, card pass after hours.......Mostly everyone here owns 3 plus guns because of the hunting and shooting range.....Folks in town also have knowledge that this not the place to come and try to commit break ins as the chances are pretty high you would leave with a butt load of buck shot and no tv....LOL..........
Here is my dilemna......Our BOD wants to employ a full time deputy from our local law enforcement to patrol our streets( Private roads ) when he is off duty...They would not pay him per se, but barter out his rent for the patrol services.... We have three hunt cottages that members may rent for when they come out to hunt or spend the weekend if they do not have a permanent home yet built... Our BOD wants to "give" this deputy full time use of the cottage and most of us here feel that this violates our "rights" to use of our common area.....These units were part of the land use plan for "temporary" use not intended to be used for someone to live in full time.
As a taxpayer of the County for which I live , feel this is a blantant waste of my tax payers dollars to pay for the gas, upkeep of a county owned vehicle for patrol in a private gated community...Our roads are rock and gravel and the wear and tear on our own vehicles is one thing-- BUT- as a tax payer apart from being a homeowner here am appalled they would even consider this idea... We do not have any crime here......ZILCH...never have had to have a deputy respond to any criminal mischief.....Our last deputy who lived here was fired by the county for having sex on duty with a local crack chick....Nice guy....he also was stopping females late at nite here in our subdivision for allegedly speeding...YEA RIGHT......
Some of the members here feel that the BOD have overstepped their bounds by wanting to this without any input from the members...We questioned them about following stautes about having the county sign an aggreement about using the local law enforcement for patrols to no avail.......
Any help from you will be greatly appreciated as to what direction we the homeowners could take to get this action reversed...........thanks bunches LindaC
Here is my dilemna......Our BOD wants to employ a full time deputy from our local law enforcement to patrol our streets( Private roads ) when he is off duty...They would not pay him per se, but barter out his rent for the patrol services.... We have three hunt cottages that members may rent for when they come out to hunt or spend the weekend if they do not have a permanent home yet built... Our BOD wants to "give" this deputy full time use of the cottage and most of us here feel that this violates our "rights" to use of our common area.....These units were part of the land use plan for "temporary" use not intended to be used for someone to live in full time.
As a taxpayer of the County for which I live , feel this is a blantant waste of my tax payers dollars to pay for the gas, upkeep of a county owned vehicle for patrol in a private gated community...Our roads are rock and gravel and the wear and tear on our own vehicles is one thing-- BUT- as a tax payer apart from being a homeowner here am appalled they would even consider this idea... We do not have any crime here......ZILCH...never have had to have a deputy respond to any criminal mischief.....Our last deputy who lived here was fired by the county for having sex on duty with a local crack chick....Nice guy....he also was stopping females late at nite here in our subdivision for allegedly speeding...YEA RIGHT......
Some of the members here feel that the BOD have overstepped their bounds by wanting to this without any input from the members...We questioned them about following stautes about having the county sign an aggreement about using the local law enforcement for patrols to no avail.......
Any help from you will be greatly appreciated as to what direction we the homeowners could take to get this action reversed...........thanks bunches LindaC