ToniG2
Posts: 15
Posts: 15
Posted:
I am a board member of a small HOA with 26 voting lots. We self-manageI. No property management company. I am continually at odds with the board President. I am looking for feedback on this one particular issue.
We had our Annual Members Meeting yesterday. The agenda included a membership vote to allow for electronic voting. He intends to have voting conducted via email. My objections to his approach, the process to institute electronic voting, and the means for voting, ie email, falls on deaf ears. At the Members Meeting I read aloud the statute word for word. I objected to voting by email but he says everything required in the statute he can do via email. The Membership voted and passed electronic voting via email.
Our documents do not provide for electronic voting. In an email to him today I told him a board meeting was needed to adopt a resolution and provided the direct link to the part of the statute regarding electronic voting. He wrote back saying he does not feel the board needs to adopt a resolution, that the membership adopted the electronic voting with their vote yesterday. BIG SIGH. If he would just read the statute and try to give it consideration, he would see that the resolution is not just about adopting electronic voting, itâs also about the process.
I, IMHO, see no way to implement what is required for a voting process by email. The statute does not specifically rule out email. Yet I feel that internet voting system means just that: voting âsystemâ. But I suppose someone could interpret the creation of a process by which voting will be done via email as being a âsystemâ.
Electronic voting certainly benefits an association on many levels, including the ease of establishing a quorum and the participation of elections. But it also takes the voting process out of the hands of a board.
I have looked for something that I can bring to him that convinces him that email cannot be used for the purpose of voting. Or am I wrong???
Again, this is a small association. There is no way that we would pay the fees for an online voting company/software. And he isnât going to want to pay for a legal opinion.
Opinions?
We had our Annual Members Meeting yesterday. The agenda included a membership vote to allow for electronic voting. He intends to have voting conducted via email. My objections to his approach, the process to institute electronic voting, and the means for voting, ie email, falls on deaf ears. At the Members Meeting I read aloud the statute word for word. I objected to voting by email but he says everything required in the statute he can do via email. The Membership voted and passed electronic voting via email.
Our documents do not provide for electronic voting. In an email to him today I told him a board meeting was needed to adopt a resolution and provided the direct link to the part of the statute regarding electronic voting. He wrote back saying he does not feel the board needs to adopt a resolution, that the membership adopted the electronic voting with their vote yesterday. BIG SIGH. If he would just read the statute and try to give it consideration, he would see that the resolution is not just about adopting electronic voting, itâs also about the process.
I, IMHO, see no way to implement what is required for a voting process by email. The statute does not specifically rule out email. Yet I feel that internet voting system means just that: voting âsystemâ. But I suppose someone could interpret the creation of a process by which voting will be done via email as being a âsystemâ.
Electronic voting certainly benefits an association on many levels, including the ease of establishing a quorum and the participation of elections. But it also takes the voting process out of the hands of a board.
I have looked for something that I can bring to him that convinces him that email cannot be used for the purpose of voting. Or am I wrong???
Again, this is a small association. There is no way that we would pay the fees for an online voting company/software. And he isnât going to want to pay for a legal opinion.
Opinions?