JR13 (Virginia)
Posts: 36
Posts: 36
Posted:
It all started when we first got a letter saying we need to C&D harassing the geese "shooing them off" with a remote control car. That it was an illegal activity. I sent a copy of this letter to the USDA and the USDA replied stating it was perfectly legal citing "§ 21.41 - Depredation permits" which states: No permit is required merely to scare or herd depredating migratory birds.
The Condo Assoc/board obviously didn't like this response, and each email/letter we received constantly evolved with a new reason/excuse as to why we couldn't shoo them away. With each response we specifically requested they cite which rule in the bylaws we were violating or which rule gave them the authority to fine us for such a thing.
They "both the board, condo assoc. "manager", and 2 lawyers" have all quoted the following bylaw stating it gives them full authority over the common grounds. In all actuality it's just a maintenance clause: SECTION TWO: UPKEEP OF THE CONDOMINIUM. All powers and responsibilities with regard to maintenance, repair, renovation, restoration, and replacement of the condominium shall belong (1) to the Unit Owners' Association in the case of the general common elements, and (2) to the individual unit owner in the case of any unit and-limited common elements appertaining thereto or any part thereof. Each unit owner shall afford to the other unit owners and to the Unit Owners' Association and to any agents or employees of either such access through his unit as may be reasonably necessary to enable them to exercise and discharge their respective powers and responsibilities. But to the extent that damage is inflicted on the common elements or any unit through which access is taken, the unit owner causing the same, or the Unit Owners' Association if it caused the same, shall be liable for the prompt repair thereof.
They have never quoted this bylaw: PAGE 12: SECTION EIGHT: RULES OF CONDUCT. (a) Residents and guests shall exercise extreme care in making noises or using musical instruments, radios, televisions, and amplifiers that may disturb other residents.
BUT! they have quoted a rule in our "handbook" that says: DISTURBANCES: No home owners, their tenants, guests, families or invitees shall make or cause to be made any noises, music or disturbances which shall annoy or disturb other residents.
It's very important to know that our handbook is not a legal document and is not filed in circuit court. It's also prefaced stating it's just an outline of the declaration and bylaws. Nothing more. Nothing less. This is page 1 of the "handbook":
PREFACE TO THE % % CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION RULES & REGULATIONS
This booklet lists and outlines the condominium Rules & Regulations which were created with authority vested in the Board of Directors by the Virginia Condominium Act and the Cedar Lakes Condominium Association, Inc., Declarations and Bylaws. The Rules and Regulations set forth standards which all unit owners, their tenants, guests, friends, families, invitees, etc., are to comply with to insure a quality standard of lifestyle for all residents.
==
The board held a meeting. We, for obvious reasons, didn't attend. They sent us this letter: Due to the ongoing nature of this issue, and the distress it causes other residents, a violation hearing was held at % at the clubhouse. We are sorry that you did not attend, and the Board held the hearing in your absence. The board discussed the ongoing non-compliance and determined that $50.00 per violation occurrence, in accordance with the Virginia Condominium Act, would be assessed to your account. We have added two instances that you were personally witnessed by the Board President for a total of $100. Going forward, your account will be assessed a $50 fee each time you are observed harassing the geese or causing any other nuisance, including parking nuisances.
-not even going to get into the parking issue, but it's an equally entertaining story.
More recently their attorney acknowledged the email from the USDA and stated that she was aware that harassing the geese was legal. That the issue wasn't with me harassing the geese but was with the time and manner in which I chose to do so. She didn't go into detail about the manner... which I assume was using my RC car or my laser pointer, she did however state I was doing this at 2AM which is not true.
We replied to her email stating that the fines are in violation of VA State Code "55-79.42:1" and VA Supreme Court case ruling "Shadowood Condominium Association v. Fairfax County Redevelopment and Housing Authority" which states the board cannot impose penalties for violations outside of the Declaration and By Laws. We also asked if it was legal why all of our fines say "$50 harassing the geese" and to remove the fines - no response to date.
==
To further paint a picture: They send us tons of other emails with baseless accusations stating I put a camera on my RC car and was recording the neighbors and that it's considered harassment. That I'm harassing and intimidating the neighbors to the point they feel unsafe in their own home, etc. All which are untrue. Over the course of two weeks I had one lady try to dump a bucket of water on head, people outside screaming at me, cursing at me, following me around with cameras, and one older guy even grabbed my arm. Luckily that happened in front of my security camera and I was able to press assault charges against him. We notified management, with PROOF "images/video" and their response was "I'm sorry the neighbors feel the need to record you for their own protection", "VA is a one party state, the neighbors are perfectly within their right to record you, I CANNOT STOP THE RESIDENTS FROM DOING SOMETHING THAT IS PERFECTLY LEGAL". They also say that just me using the common grounds "walking around the lake" is lurking and that it's making the residents feel uncomfortable. They didn't acknowledge the physical assault at all.
So if someone lies about me doing something, it's harassment and they are gravely concerned. If the neighbors do it, and I have proof, it's for their own protection. If the other residents are doing something that's legal it's OK, but if I'm doing something that's legal they fine me for it. I'm currently researching if there's an age/sex discrimination lawsuit here, probably not, in addition to the obvious lawsuit.
The Condo Assoc/board obviously didn't like this response, and each email/letter we received constantly evolved with a new reason/excuse as to why we couldn't shoo them away. With each response we specifically requested they cite which rule in the bylaws we were violating or which rule gave them the authority to fine us for such a thing.
They "both the board, condo assoc. "manager", and 2 lawyers" have all quoted the following bylaw stating it gives them full authority over the common grounds. In all actuality it's just a maintenance clause: SECTION TWO: UPKEEP OF THE CONDOMINIUM. All powers and responsibilities with regard to maintenance, repair, renovation, restoration, and replacement of the condominium shall belong (1) to the Unit Owners' Association in the case of the general common elements, and (2) to the individual unit owner in the case of any unit and-limited common elements appertaining thereto or any part thereof. Each unit owner shall afford to the other unit owners and to the Unit Owners' Association and to any agents or employees of either such access through his unit as may be reasonably necessary to enable them to exercise and discharge their respective powers and responsibilities. But to the extent that damage is inflicted on the common elements or any unit through which access is taken, the unit owner causing the same, or the Unit Owners' Association if it caused the same, shall be liable for the prompt repair thereof.
They have never quoted this bylaw: PAGE 12: SECTION EIGHT: RULES OF CONDUCT. (a) Residents and guests shall exercise extreme care in making noises or using musical instruments, radios, televisions, and amplifiers that may disturb other residents.
BUT! they have quoted a rule in our "handbook" that says: DISTURBANCES: No home owners, their tenants, guests, families or invitees shall make or cause to be made any noises, music or disturbances which shall annoy or disturb other residents.
It's very important to know that our handbook is not a legal document and is not filed in circuit court. It's also prefaced stating it's just an outline of the declaration and bylaws. Nothing more. Nothing less. This is page 1 of the "handbook":
PREFACE TO THE % % CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION RULES & REGULATIONS
This booklet lists and outlines the condominium Rules & Regulations which were created with authority vested in the Board of Directors by the Virginia Condominium Act and the Cedar Lakes Condominium Association, Inc., Declarations and Bylaws. The Rules and Regulations set forth standards which all unit owners, their tenants, guests, friends, families, invitees, etc., are to comply with to insure a quality standard of lifestyle for all residents.
==
The board held a meeting. We, for obvious reasons, didn't attend. They sent us this letter: Due to the ongoing nature of this issue, and the distress it causes other residents, a violation hearing was held at % at the clubhouse. We are sorry that you did not attend, and the Board held the hearing in your absence. The board discussed the ongoing non-compliance and determined that $50.00 per violation occurrence, in accordance with the Virginia Condominium Act, would be assessed to your account. We have added two instances that you were personally witnessed by the Board President for a total of $100. Going forward, your account will be assessed a $50 fee each time you are observed harassing the geese or causing any other nuisance, including parking nuisances.
-not even going to get into the parking issue, but it's an equally entertaining story.
More recently their attorney acknowledged the email from the USDA and stated that she was aware that harassing the geese was legal. That the issue wasn't with me harassing the geese but was with the time and manner in which I chose to do so. She didn't go into detail about the manner... which I assume was using my RC car or my laser pointer, she did however state I was doing this at 2AM which is not true.
We replied to her email stating that the fines are in violation of VA State Code "55-79.42:1" and VA Supreme Court case ruling "Shadowood Condominium Association v. Fairfax County Redevelopment and Housing Authority" which states the board cannot impose penalties for violations outside of the Declaration and By Laws. We also asked if it was legal why all of our fines say "$50 harassing the geese" and to remove the fines - no response to date.
==
To further paint a picture: They send us tons of other emails with baseless accusations stating I put a camera on my RC car and was recording the neighbors and that it's considered harassment. That I'm harassing and intimidating the neighbors to the point they feel unsafe in their own home, etc. All which are untrue. Over the course of two weeks I had one lady try to dump a bucket of water on head, people outside screaming at me, cursing at me, following me around with cameras, and one older guy even grabbed my arm. Luckily that happened in front of my security camera and I was able to press assault charges against him. We notified management, with PROOF "images/video" and their response was "I'm sorry the neighbors feel the need to record you for their own protection", "VA is a one party state, the neighbors are perfectly within their right to record you, I CANNOT STOP THE RESIDENTS FROM DOING SOMETHING THAT IS PERFECTLY LEGAL". They also say that just me using the common grounds "walking around the lake" is lurking and that it's making the residents feel uncomfortable. They didn't acknowledge the physical assault at all.
So if someone lies about me doing something, it's harassment and they are gravely concerned. If the neighbors do it, and I have proof, it's for their own protection. If the other residents are doing something that's legal it's OK, but if I'm doing something that's legal they fine me for it. I'm currently researching if there's an age/sex discrimination lawsuit here, probably not, in addition to the obvious lawsuit.