Quote:
Posted By TobyC on 03/04/2020 12:27 PM
Thanks for taking the time. The door did not appear to be visibly rotted before the accident with nothing more than a cursory look. While the townhouse insurance would not give me the entire policy I was allowed to see the coverage and it appears that damage to cars is excluded. I just don't understand how on one end the door is your responsibility but on the other the damage is not!
Thanks again.
My understanding is that this is the way cases of property damage are handled in court. Insurance usually follows the courts (unless you have extra coverage such as the car's collision coverage).
In order to collect damages from someone in court or through their insurance (the association or a neighbor), you have to show that they did something wrong – not just responsible for the garage doors, but actually negligent in that responsibility. Negligence would mean that they knew about the rot in the garage door and did nothing to protect the car, or they should have known about the rot since other garage doors had the same problem, or that they (or a contractor) used defective materials to repair the door or the roof.
Do you know if they had any advance knowledge of the problem or if other garage doors had this problem?
They would likely argue that they are not negligent since the rot was not visible, so they did nothing wrong. And if it was noticeable, then the tenant should have reported it. It was an unforeseeable problem due to an unseen leak.
The association will have property damage insurance, which generally does not cover personal belongings such as a car. This is probably what the insurance guy showed you. However, the association will also have liability insurance, which will cover the damage to the car, but only if they are liable due to negligence. The insurance guy probably did not explain to you that portion of the policy or that they need to make a claim on the liability part.