Quote:
Posted By AG5 on 02/17/2020 1:17 AM
Posted By DouglasK1 on 02/15/2020 8:12 PM
Most HOA governing documents specify that directors/officers are not compensated. What do yours say? Assuming they have similar, your association might be able to hire you to as a manager, depending on your governing docs state law. In any case if you are compensated it would be considered taxable income and would need to be reported on a 1099 or similar form. There are some posters here from CA that might be able to chime in on state specific laws, but this site seems to be the CA HOA law bible:
https://www.davis-stirling.com/
I don't have time to try to research this, but you can see if there is anything there.
I don't think my CC&R specifies directors or officers. Which section of it would talk about this stuff? Would I need to create an amendment for this? If so, where could I find official paperwork and does it need to be notarized?
What is the difference between a manager, director, and president of HOA?
Thanks,
AG5
Look in your bylaws, not in the CC&Rs.
In short, a director is a board member and has been elected to the board by the membership. Once on the board, he will typically be named to an officer position (president, secretary, treasurer, etc.) You can be a director but not an officer. You can also be named an officer without being elected to the board. Only board members have decision-making authority, and no single board member has more authority than the others (although some presidents seem to think that they do).
A manager (often referred to as a property manager or PM) takes care of the everyday running of the property, although PMs can perform a wide range of duties that are spelled out in their contract. PMs are nearly always paid. The PM works at the direction of the board and not the other way around. A PM does not have live in the community, although some do in large communities.
Small communities are often self-managed, which means the board also handles the tasks that are performed by the PM in professionally managed communities. The economics make sense. However, professional PMs generally have specialized knowledge and skills that homeowners do not, which leads some people to describe communities as being "self-mismanaged".
My rule of thumb is, if the board knows how to do it, they should do it without compensation. If they lack certain skills, employ professionals. You'll be spending enough on the professionals that it's unlikely you'll want to pay yourselves on top of it. I mean, what's the point of receiving compensation if you have to raise your assessments to pay for it (as well as do the necessary paperwork to account for it)? Work for free: you end up in the same spot financially, but without the paperwork.