💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

TerriW (Georgia)
Posts: 7
Posted:
Greetings -
About 18 months ago a couple of residents decided to revive the HOA. There was no meeting to Elect Board members *per our by-laws there should be an annual meeting to do so* Now the self-appointed officers have decided to double our annual dues. Our Covenants state that only the Board of Directors can raise the annual fees. I am embarrassed to share that I have yet to attend one of their HOA meetings, it seems that there are usually only 6 people in attendance. (we are a small community of about 90 homes). As a shareholder, the by-laws state that I can request an Annual Meeting where an election can take place. We are supposed to have at least 3 board directors and then the directors appoint a President, Secretary & Treasurer. The current President states that they have been acting as the board since no homeowner seem interested.

After I requested the annual meeting,the response was "We will put it on the agenda for the next HOA meeting." This is not until March 20, 2020. Our by-laws state that once a request has been made, it must happen within 60 days of the request or the homeowner can go to court to request it take place.

Any advice on how to deal with this? The group running the HOA is not following the by-laws, I am also trying to figure out what our by-laws mean by the "quorum" votes. Can someone help me understand each of the sections below? They have been "voting" on various things at the HOA meetings, so not sure if only 6 people present is a quorum?

Quorum and Required Vote
16. A minimum of 51 percent of the shares entitled to vote, present in person or represented
by proxy, will constitute a quorum entitled to take action at a meeting of Shareholders.

17. In all matters other than the election of Directors, any act of the Shareholders must be
passed by an affirmative vote of the majority of the shares present in person or represented
by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the matter.

18. Directors will be elected by a majority of the votes of the shares present in person or
represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the election of Directors.

19. Where a separate vote by a class or series or classes or series of shares Eligible Shares) is
required, 51 percent of the outstanding Eligible Shares present in person or represented by
proxy, will constitute a quorum entitled to take action with respect to that vote on that
matter. Any act to be taken must be passed by an affirmative vote of the majority of the
outstanding Eligible Shares present in person or represented by proxy.
LetA (Nevada)
Posts: 2,679
Posted:
Do you have any documentation that says your old HOA is gone? Did the covenants expire, was your property deed recorded to show you are no longer part of an HOA?

As for Quorums, that definition is in the governing documents. Quorums typically on a 3 member board mean 2 need to be in attendance to conduct business of the board. when it comes to community wide quorums, that "could" mean 2/3rds or perhaps more, possibly 85% or 90% have to vote in an HOA or approve deed restrictions.. You honestly need to consult a lawyer on the matter. This could be very hairy..tread lightly.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Terri

Based on what you say, it appears the BOD is not following procedures. Now the question is what to do about it?

1. Hold their feet to the fire with letters, Email, distribute same to other owners.
2. Build a group of like minded neighbors and pool money for legal action.
3. Lay back and take it.
4. Move.
SamE2 (New Jersey)
Posts: 310
Posted:
How long has the community been in existence, how long has the HOA been inactive, have you been payng dues all along or did it just start 18 months ago? Do you want the HOA to be inactive or are you just unhappy the way it is being run? Seems like the new board is in a hard spot because not many in the community are interested. I always question the motives of the members that demanded things but never showed up for meetings. I find the best way to be heard is by being involved.
SamE2 (New Jersey)
Posts: 310
Posted:
How long has the community been in existence, how long has the HOA been inactive, have you been payng dues all along or did it just start 18 months ago? Do you want the HOA to be inactive or are you just unhappy the way it is being run? Seems like the new board is in a hard spot because not many in the community are interested. I always question the motives of the members that demanded things but never showed up for meetings. I find the best way to be heard is by being involved.
TerriW (Georgia)
Posts: 7
Posted:
LetA -
Thank you for your response. I do not have documentation that says the old HOA is gone, I did see where the people that are now running the meetings have registered our non-profit corporation/HOA. And this is fine, I do not wish for the HOA to go away. I do want one in our community, would just like for the bylaws /Covenants to be followed.

Thanks again for your help, still trying to understand the voting verbiage.
TerriW (Georgia)
Posts: 7
Posted:
JohnC46 -

Good question! Yesterday I spoke with three other homeowners who are equally concerned. We collectively decided that the best move was to request the Annual Board Meeting so owners could properly elect board members. Do we have the option as homeowners to arrange the meeting ourselves if these two volunteers do not take action? Right now we do not want to take legal action.

Thank you again for your response!
TerriW (Georgia)
Posts: 7
Posted:
SamE2 -
Greetings! The community has been in existence since 1995. I was the first homeowner to move in and did serve on the HOA when it was turned over to the homeowners. We were active for a while, then went dormant for many years. A treasurer continued to send out yearly dues/invoices and I am current/paid the invoice every year. I do not want the HOA to be inactive, just would like it be run properly. You are correct that not many in the community are interested, so it does make it difficult for the volunteers to run things. I think things got off to a rocky start with the new group, as they have implemented some unpopular things...........for instance, speed bumps (not a problem for me, but several did not want them and have to pay for them), telling homeowners they cannot park on the street and wanting to put up No Parking On Street signs in yard (our local county owns the streets), doubling the homeowner's dues.......

I agree with your statement, that we should have been attending meetings and become involved earlier. That is on us. I would like to get involved going forward and would just like the bylaws to be followed.
JF10 (Washington)
Posts: 5
Posted:
You really can't do anything about what is happening unless you want to hire an attorney and even then I doubt you would see any difference in the situation. Nobody is participating and really thats makes me question its usefulness? The oeople on the board likely cant be held accountable for wrong doing because they are protected with broad immunity as board members of a corporation. But really, are they doing anything wrong? My suggeation is to rally the community behind a plan to disband (there is a proper term for this) and replace it with a management company that can set dues which cover the expenses of the community like pools, club houses, parks. People will vote on this because it does t sound like they want to be in an HOA, who does? Unless you can get a quarem to attend a meeting you really dont have a lot of options.
TerriW (Georgia)
Posts: 7
Posted:
Well, I have discovered that there have only been 2 "board Members" when our by-laws state there should be 3. So, doesn't that mean they cannot conduct business until the third seat is filled?
GeorgeS21 (Florida)
Posts: 3,808
Posted:
No.
TerriW (Georgia)
Posts: 7
Posted:
I am reading the by-laws for clarifcation:

General Powers
31. The business and affairs of the Corporation will be managed by or under the direction of the
Board.
Number, Tenure and Quorum
32. The Board will consist of three members, each of whom will be a natural person. Directors
need not be Shareholders. Each Director will hold office until that Director's successor is
elected and qualified or until that Director's earlier resignation or removal. Any Director
may resign at any time upon notice given in writing or by electronic transmission to the
Corporation. In order to transact business at a meeting of the Directors, a quorum of 66
percent of the total number of Directors eligible to vote will be required. The vote of the
majority of the Directors present at a meeting at which a quorum is present will be the act
of the Board.

So even though the bylaws state the board should consist of 3 members, they can still conduct business? I understand they can still meet, etc. But what about making decisions such as raising homeowner's fees? Also, we are supposed to have Officers who are appointed by the Board. The two volunteers are also filling the positions of "President, Treasurer and Secretary". Our bylaws clearly state that the board should appoint officers.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Teri

Even though the Bylaws call for a BOD of three, two alone form a Quorum and they can conduct business. Now if they vote one to one, any motion fails.
TerriW (Georgia)
Posts: 7
Posted:
Got it, thank you --

On a more positive note, trying to unite our community and get people involved so put out an email and offered to organize an Easter Egg hunt for the kiddos in April.

I will wait & see if the board decides to honor my request to hold an election and go from there.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here