SherryR (California)
Posts: 6
Posts: 6
Posted:
The Davis-Stirling Act in California part 1378, requires the Board of the Directors to respond promptly to written requests for modifications to units and common areas. The code required that a process with a time period for review must be outlined in the CC & R's.
In our CC & R's, this process is outlined with a 60 day period for review by the Architectual Committee which we do not have. I submitted plans for a change directly to the Board of Directors, in writting and with a signature confirming receipt of this request. Although, the Board reviewed my request and came to look at the patio, they did not reply within the 60 days as outlined in our rules.
Question: if the requirements of requesting a change has been properly submitted, and one does not received any written response from the Board within the required time of 60 days, is the request deemed approved? Can they come back after the fact and require I put things back as they were?
In our CC & R's, this process is outlined with a 60 day period for review by the Architectual Committee which we do not have. I submitted plans for a change directly to the Board of Directors, in writting and with a signature confirming receipt of this request. Although, the Board reviewed my request and came to look at the patio, they did not reply within the 60 days as outlined in our rules.
Question: if the requirements of requesting a change has been properly submitted, and one does not received any written response from the Board within the required time of 60 days, is the request deemed approved? Can they come back after the fact and require I put things back as they were?