PaulJ6
Posts: 990
Posts: 990
Posted:
Many states have laws that describe how HOAs are to operate, generally. Those laws often defer to the HOA's own governing documents for how the HOA should operate.
If the HOA misbehaves, the owner's options are (1) try to replace the board, which is often difficult, (2) file a lawsuit or (3) move. None of those, and particularly (2) or (3), are appealing options: they're lengthy and potentially expensive processes. HOA governing documents are often stacked in favor of the existing board or developer.
I generally dislike government, but HOA governance is an area that more government oversight might make sense. Perhaps the following would help reduce conflicts between owners and boards:
1. More details about how elections have to be held, to make sure elections are held, and held fairly.
2. More details about reporting that HOAs have to do, such as about their finances and relationships with management companies.
And, most of all:
3. A neutral party to whom disputes between HOAs and owners could be referred for mediation, without requiring lawsuits.
4. Penalties if the HOA doesn't hold fair elections or produce required reports. (Often, there are no penalties unless the owner files a lawsuit.)
Why haven't these things been put into law? Does the real estate industry contribute so heavily to government that it helps keep HOAs one-sided, against owners? Do Republicans who dominate (or have dominated) suburbs just not want more government? Something else?
Thanks.
If the HOA misbehaves, the owner's options are (1) try to replace the board, which is often difficult, (2) file a lawsuit or (3) move. None of those, and particularly (2) or (3), are appealing options: they're lengthy and potentially expensive processes. HOA governing documents are often stacked in favor of the existing board or developer.
I generally dislike government, but HOA governance is an area that more government oversight might make sense. Perhaps the following would help reduce conflicts between owners and boards:
1. More details about how elections have to be held, to make sure elections are held, and held fairly.
2. More details about reporting that HOAs have to do, such as about their finances and relationships with management companies.
And, most of all:
3. A neutral party to whom disputes between HOAs and owners could be referred for mediation, without requiring lawsuits.
4. Penalties if the HOA doesn't hold fair elections or produce required reports. (Often, there are no penalties unless the owner files a lawsuit.)
Why haven't these things been put into law? Does the real estate industry contribute so heavily to government that it helps keep HOAs one-sided, against owners? Do Republicans who dominate (or have dominated) suburbs just not want more government? Something else?
Thanks.