💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

MatthewC4 (Ohio)
Posts: 6
Posted:
Brand new member here and wasn't able to find my question - apologies in advance if this has been discussed before.

Our development is going to take over the HOA from the developer soon. One (and really only) pain point we have is that there is a plot for commercial land at the end of the street that we've been told is slated for condominiums. The concern is that these condos themselves would create more traffic but even more concerning is that they would connect our road with a main 4-lane thoroughfare and essentially turn our quiet 25 mph cul de sac into a cut-through. I should note the concern is balanced by the fact that the land has been for sale for more than a decade and no one is biting.

In the meantime, the empty field is a haven for dirt bikes and partying teenagers. It's a rural township that...believe it or not...doesn't have active police protection. Long story short there is that a while back the town voted down a levy for Sheriff support. They'll show up if someone is getting murdered (eventually) but they're not bothering themselves with nuisance complaints which leaves us more or less on our own.

I've done a little bit of research and between the number of houses and potential sale price of the land, using the HOA to band together and buy the land (and GL insurance) would be affordable in the relatively affluent neighborhood of about 30 homes. My opinion is that doing so would stop potential decrease of home values if/when the roads get connected. We would also have better control of who goes back there.

More than likely a daydream as I imagine the loan process on vacant land that isn't intended for development is a huge uphill battle and getting HOA/member buy-in might be an insurmountable task but thought I'd ask to see if anyone had any similar experience or thoughts?
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Welcome.

Good explanation. Makes sense.

How much per household would it cost? Do you have the funds or would you need a special assessment? If needed, could you borrow funds from reserves and be able to pay it back?

To "sell" your idea to the community, I think you'll need some kind of plan to change how the land is being used. That will cost more money? And it will take time. Are you ready for all the questions?

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
ND (PA)
Posts: 792
Posted:
To do this, it may require 100% (or some other high percentage) of member agreement. Maybe your docs would indicate that number.

Perhaps before expending any significant effort to devise a plan for the land and figure out all that needs to be done to make it happen, maybe with the research you've already done, you conduct a simple survey of all members to gauge likelihood of it even being worth considering further. After showing brief info for consideration, survey would be one question . . . "Would you be willing to contribute money (insert SWAG amount here) along with all other HOA Members to buy this land, controlling any possible future development; or continue to allow the current property owner to determine the future, unknown, potentially detrimental (to the HOA) development of this land?" Answers could be: "Yes", "No", "Maybe" . . . and allow people to submit to you their thoughts and ideas for consolidation.
MatthewC4 (Ohio)
Posts: 6
Posted:
Thanks for the reply. I should really stress that this very much a "pie in the sky" idea that I'm 99.9% sure will never come to fruition. But it never hurts to have all the facts/info as sometimes far-fetched ideas can become reality - like when you're facing down the barrel of having your street turn into a drag strip.

Very much in the infancy of doing research as I'm not even sure how the loan process or a special assessment for vacant land works - let alone doing it through HOA funds - as I imagine the HOA doesn't have nearly the reserve to cover the cost.

Current dues are ridiculously minimal at $75/annual/home which covers the maintenance of a very small communal space at the entrance. Rough estimates for the cost of the land/loan over the amount of homes comes to roughly $450/annual/home. Obviously a huge jump and a hard pill to swallow but, given home values (and the volume at which people complain about said field), it's an easy assumption that most people could afford it and really nothing else is needed in the neighborhood.

As far as land use, I imagine that having a common space, pavilion, park, etc would be optimal but obviously an additional cost. At this point, I'm purely looking at something like this as purely a preventative measure.

At minimum, it would be nice to have ammunition for the "let it go/deal with it" side of the debate as almost every...single...household complains about the dirt bikes and teenagers (incessantly). A way to say "put your money where your mouth is on a solution or zip it" ;)
MatthewC4 (Ohio)
Posts: 6
Posted:
Love the idea of a survey. Thanks.
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
Playing devil's advocate here (and in the OP's place, I'd also be thinking about buying the land):

* Do you know why no one has purchased the land before now? I'd want to know that before moving ahead with plans to buy it myself.

* Your HOA would now be responsible for insuring and policing the land. The partyers and bikers won't go away unless the property is made inaccessible in some way, and without police protection, the burden will fall on the HOA.

* What are your plans for the land, if any? What are the tax implications? Is it zoned commercial, residential, or mixed? Can this be changed?

* If the land is developed, would there be a way to provide access without having your community become a cut through to the highway?

There is probably some other pitfall that I haven't thought about...

Cathy
ND (PA)
Posts: 792
Posted:
A survey . . . in addition to determining which way a majority of the members may be leaning, may also uncover other owners who think similarly to you and might want to assist in your endeavor. Consider a spot on the survey to collect contact info for folks who would be willing to assist.

Also suggest having a discussion with existing homeowner Board members (if any) on your thoughts and what you're trying to do. Board Members would be in the best position to assist with the effort or completely put a stop to it because of their own personal opinions/biases.

Finally, the initial cost of the land might be a big chunk; however, I would think that annual expenses for it (maintenance, taxes, insurance coverage) should be a minimal, continual expense. I don't follow how your assessments would jump from $75/yr to $450/yr for each owner . . . unless I'm misunderstanding. Maybe a special assessment to first acquire the property would be large, but then only a minimal increase in annual assessment to cover maintenance, tax, insurance.
CjC
Posts: 210
Posted:
In our HOA, we do not need a member vote to buy land, only sell land. We have done extensive research on this since we looked into it this year as well. Look into grants to reforest land, that was what we were going to do to defray the cost of purchasing it. You have to agree to plant trees and return it to nature never to be developed. That would prevent bikers and maybe partiers. We could get a loan against assessments and we surveyed the community and a high percentage agreed to the purchase. In the end we did not, we lost out.
KellyM3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 2,239
Posted:
Your primary challenge is generating the community votes to engage in a purchase. You'll likely need that support to enter into a loan arrangement between the HOA and a lender.

The loan process isn't so bad or not as bad as the petition process. The bank will note the cashflow of the HOA and may want to see the official vote/approval of a dues hike or special assessment to accommodate the down payment and dues increase.

Your lawyer/closing fees will likely be higher because the transaction isn't as simple as if two people were in the transaction but I think you can pull it out. Personally, I think everyone in your community would be interested in a well-crafted strategy to protect the community even if they decide to take the risk of the property being developed.

I wouldn't worry about kids on dirt bikes in a semi-rural area. That comes with the geography. I would worry about the permanent cut-through and possible traffic flow.

CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KellyM3 on 07/24/2019 10:22 AM

I wouldn't worry about kids on dirt bikes in a semi-rural area. That comes with the geography. ...

I would if I owned the property and had a high-enough net worth to be an attractive target for a lawsuit.
MatthewC4 (Ohio)
Posts: 6
Posted:
Thanks, all. Appreciate the responses. All good stuff to think about and you've all given me some talking points as this "issue" develops and we take over the HOA. Exactly what I was looking for.

As an aside, I don't care about the dirt bikes as I grew up on one. The whining neighbors is another thing ;) My only real concern is the road becoming a cut-through which would be awful.
GenoS (Florida)
Posts: 4,276
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CathyA3 on 07/24/2019 10:48 AM
I would if I owned the property and had a high-enough net worth to be an attractive target for a lawsuit.

If I was in that demographic I wouldn't be living in a place that had no police force.

As for avoiding the road becoming a cut-through, a gated entrance/exit is simple enough.
ND (PA)
Posts: 792
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By GenoS on 07/24/2019 5:30 PM
Posted By CathyA3 on 07/24/2019 10:48 AM
I would if I owned the property and had a high-enough net worth to be an attractive target for a lawsuit.

If I was in that demographic I wouldn't be living in a place that had no police force.

As for avoiding the road becoming a cut-through, a gated entrance/exit is simple enough.

A gated entrance is much more involved than simply installing a gate. It's likely that HOA would be required to take ownership of roadways in the community. When considering immediate and long-term expenses, road maintenance/replacement is expensive and if currently the local municipality is responsible, then you probably want to keep it that way. Further, there would be the immediate cost of the gate, and then the constant headache of controlling access and maintenance of the gate.

A gate may be a workable solution to a potential cut-through concern, but may not be a possibility with the condo and street development plans the way they are.

Perhaps another avenue for resolving your concern about your neighborhood becoming a cut-through is to work to have the plans revised for development of that land and your street. I have no idea if it's even possible or what it would take, but if you could somehow ensure that when/if something gets built on the land, they are not allowed to connect your cul-de-sac roadway to the 4-lane thoroughfare. Expressing you concerns to the Land Development folks in your municipality, perhaps getting opinions of roadway experts on the impact of connecting the roadways, or helping to fund the revision of the land development plans would help your cause. Again, I'm not sure if such a thing is even possible at this stage or the owner would entertain the possibility of changing development plans, but a different way to possibly resolve your concern.
ChrisC17 (South Carolina)
Posts: 6
Posted:
I know this is 2 years old but we are having this same discussion right now so I'm looking for info. I'm on the board of an HOA with 379 homes and $460 annual dues. We have a large community pool and little else in our neighborhood. There are 8 acres or undeveloped land attached to our neighborhood that is available to purchase. The word is a nearby campsite owner is considering buying but there are other possibilities.

I would like to evaluate the possibility of the HOA buying this land. First and foremost, it would give us a say in what, if anything, gets done there. Cost would be around $300k so about $750 total per homeowner. We could buy it and do nothing and, I believe, we've avoided any decreasing home values that might occur if undesirable development is done. Again, this is all speculation but I believe the possibility is real. It would first affect those homes directly connected to the area, but would flow through the entire neighbhorhood eventually.

My thought is to approach the homeowners and ask if they feel there is anything that could be done there that might lower their home value by $750. If the answer is yes, we should consider buying it.

After we buy it, we know there is annual maintenance expenses for taxes and mowing the grass.

Long term we could consider lots of things like a dog park, community garden, basketball court, tennis court, boat/rv storage, etc. All of these would cost money and should be considered separately from the purchase decision.

I'm not seeing anything in our by-laws or covenants that specifically call this out. I see 2 items in the by-laws that seem to support the board's ability.

Article III, PURPOSE AND POWERS OF THE ASSOCIATION , starting on page 3 of by-laws

Section C - Acquire (by gift, purchase or otherwise) own, hold, improve, build upon, operate, maintain, convey, sell, lease, transfer. or otherwise dispose of real or personal property 'including, but not limited to the Common Area as determined advisable by the Board of Directors;

Section D - Borrow money, mortgage, pledge, deed in trust, or hypothecate any and all of its real or personal property including, but not limited to, the Common Area, as security for money borrowed or debts incurred upon arrival by the affirmative casting of two-thirds (2/3) of all Class A and B votes of the Association;

We will obviously engage our attorney on the details but curious what the original poster ended up doing and what experiences others have with this type.

Things I'm trying to determine:
* can the board vote to buy this property or does it require membership vote
* if it can be purchased, how do we go about doing it? one-time special assessment, multi-year special assessment, or a loan?

Curious what others think.

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Put your ideas, plans, dreams, etc. together along with cost (purchase and maintain) and distribute among fellow owners and see what happens. In business, often called floating a trial balloon.
MikeB23 (Louisiana)
Posts: 109
Posted:
Check the documents establishing your HOA. I know our Association cannot own property or make capital improvements without 100% agreement. Even in your relatively small association I suspect 100% will be a tough goal to achieve.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Mike raised an interesting point. Would buying land be a Capital Improvement? My initial blush is it would be.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Without looking beyond your question John, I would say that the land itself would not be a capital improvement. Anything built on the land would be.

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
MaxB4
Posts: 3,513
Posted:
There would be two issues, one, land acquisition and second, if you were to build on e the land, capital improvement. Both require a minimum of a a high percentage of owner's approval, while the land acquisition would involve approval from the mortgage holders.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MaxB4 on 03/09/2021 10:55 AM
There would be two issues, one, land acquisition and second, if you were to build on e the land, capital improvement. Both require a minimum of a a high percentage of owner's approval, while the land acquisition would involve approval from the mortgage holders.

What makes you say it would require mortgage holders approval? I have seen this argument before and rarely is it true especially in the case of improvements versus something that decreases value.
MaxB4
Posts: 3,513
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnC46 on 03/09/2021 3:01 PM
Posted By MaxB4 on 03/09/2021 10:55 AM
There would be two issues, one, land acquisition and second, if you were to build on e the land, capital improvement. Both require a minimum of a a high percentage of owner's approval, while the land acquisition would involve approval from the mortgage holders.


What makes you say it would require mortgage holders approval? I have seen this argument before and rarely is it true especially in the case of improvements versus something that decreases value.

Experience
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MaxB4 on 03/09/2021 3:36 PM
Posted By JohnC46 on 03/09/2021 3:01 PM
Posted By MaxB4 on 03/09/2021 10:55 AM
There would be two issues, one, land acquisition and second, if you were to build on e the land, capital improvement. Both require a minimum of a a high percentage of owner's approval, while the land acquisition would involve approval from the mortgage holders.


What makes you say it would require mortgage holders approval? I have seen this argument before and rarely is it true especially in the case of improvements versus something that decreases value.


Experience

Not much of an answer.
MaxB4
Posts: 3,513
Posted:
You answered the question, as it has been done, rarely, but it has been done. Another instance, some CCRs will state that the project is to be professionally managed, but if the Association decided to self-manage, then the mortgage holders would have the object of a say in the decision.

Again, can't answer properly without seeing all of the CCRs and possibly the Articles.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MaxB4 on 03/09/2021 3:45 PM
You answered the question, as it has been done, rarely, but it has been done. Another instance, some CCRs will state that the project is to be professionally managed, but if the Association decided to self-manage, then the mortgage holders would have the object of a say in the decision.

Again, can't answer properly without seeing all of the CCRs and possibly the Articles.

I was an owner of a townhouse in MA when the BOD came out with a list of improvements a owner could make without BOD approval ala larger windows, deck awnings, etc. One owner, a PM at a high rise building, objected and said mortgage holder approval must be gotten. The HOA lawyer basically said, as long as they were improvements, mortgage holder approval was not needed. When questioned, the lawyer said if you were reducing the value of a home then mortgage company approval could be needed as you were reducing the "equity" the mortgage holder held.
MaxB4
Posts: 3,513
Posted:
The annexation of land, that potentially affects all homeowners is different that the alternation of one window at one owners home. Again, this is from experience, take it for what it may or may not be worth.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here