💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

BB2 (Missouri)
Posts: 36
Posted:
What can be done about a HOA that wants to do some blacktopping of a portion of a road (HAO) does not own, trying to assess all properties except homeowner with 3 on that road (plan is to assess for one). Have stated Dept. of Natural Resources will get involved if it isn't done and went on to say of DNR does get involved the next thing they will do is check everyones septic tank so "Sign or else" they want everyone to sign NOW and yes it works with some people. The most annoying aspect is the road needs done we would like everyone assessed fairly and if a homeowner changes the grade on their property they should be responsible for the outcome.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Sorry, your post is a bit confusing. Not understanding the situation. I don't get why septic tanks have anything to do with paving a road? There's alot of details that are left out that may give some posters here with experience a better view of the situation. I am sure you can find some help here, if the situation was clearer.

Here's some questions to help: Are the roads owned by the HOA? Where are the septic tanks located? Has their been a meeting on this and with who? Is the assessment being divided amongst all the owners. (10 lots $100 a piece for a bill of $1,000.) What is the need and overall purpose for this road access?

Former HOA President
BB2 (Missouri)
Posts: 36
Posted:
The septic tanks are on each homeowners property all homes privately owned. No swim pool,club house, golf course nothing The HOA does not own the road or anything else. And no the assessment they are trying to levy is not being divided equally between homeowners. This is what I am saying some of the members stated they would get DNR involved if all did not agree and went on to indicate they would take it one step further and have DNR check everyones septic system. It's sign or else (the few that want the road done) will rattle every cage they can think of. additionally most would receive little or no benefit from spending $50,000.00 plus dollars. We only have 27 dues paying members
PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
BB2: There appears to be a lot that is not stated in your post. Bear with me as I pose many questions. Are you part of an actual Homeowners' Association (HOA) with official documents (CC&Rs) recorded which govern how the Board is to lead/manage the community of residents? If so, how old is it? Has the developer 'transitioned' the association to the residents? Do you have a Property Manager?

Is the 'road' in question deeded to the community association for repair and maintenance (it would be stated in your documents as a capital reserve item) or is it the responsibility of the local municipality? If the road is not 'owned' by the HOA why, then, would the Board choose take on the responsibility to fund the blacktopping by assessing homeowners?
JoeW1 (New York)
Posts: 728
Posted:
MelissaP1 - The septic tanks have nothing to do with the road, that's why the subject line is titled "scare tactics", or IMHO shakedown. Outrageous, I'd tell the HOA Board to go fly a kite, speak to my attorney because I'm not paying for the maintenance of any element the HOA does not own. End of story.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
JOEW1, I was trying to understand what the use of threatening Septic tanks and paying for a road have in common? I wouldn't think threatening to check my septic system would be a scare tactic when it came to paving a road. It's like apples and oranges to me. I wouldn't care if someone threatened to check my septic or else. Doesn't make sense the connection unless the septic systems were located near or at where the road is being paved at. That would ruin a septic system for cars driving over it.

The above posters questions are really good. The definition of your HOA is a mystery at this point. Understanding your HOA's setup would shed alot of light on this situation. Some HOA's do own their own roads while others are maintained by the City/County. It is sounding like a combination of both here. Maybe add a few more details just so we can see the big picture. Thanks!

Former HOA President
JoeW1 (New York)
Posts: 728
Posted:
MelissaP1 - You do understand there is no connection between septic tanks and paying for the road, correct?
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Gee whiz, No I don't? Seems to me the poster is saying the HOA is threatening to inspect people's Septic tanks if they don't sign the paperwork to approve the special assessment for the roads. Or maybe I missed the point of this person's use of "Scare tactics"? I am trying to find why that would be a scare tactic since there SEEMS nothing in common between the two. Thanks for clearing things up with pointing out again the non-connection. It wasn't clear the first 2 times it was requested the original poster explain a bit better.

Former HOA President
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Many people who are still on septic tanks today may have tanks in less than good repair.

Many had clay pipes at one point. Even without the weaker pipes, there might be other cracks and/or maintenance issues, by virtue of the systems being so old.

Many times (in fact in ALL cases here in Louisville, from what I've been told) septic tanks are allowed to be repaired but not replaced, especially now that all areas of the city have access to sewers, but many residents in older subdivisions have not made the switchover.

In cases such as those, if an inspector found the system lacking, the homeowner would be required to pay a huge hookup fee to the sewer system.

So it's possible a bit of leverage could be used in a threat like that to some areas: Sign to agree to assessment or risk having to pay thousands more when we turn you in to the Department of Natural resources (or whichever department regulates waste disposal.)

JohnC10 (Arizona)
Posts: 106
Posted:
Sounds like everyone should hook-up to city sewers before a new road is laid. I'd beat 'em to the punch and call in the inspectors to check out my own system. Or at least a qualified professional.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
John, that's easier said than done.

I know that there are a lot of "pockets" in our community where people did not connected within the allotted time after the sewers were put in.

They felt, I'm sure, that they could just wait it out and probably die in their home without having to pay that cost.

Now, in order to hook up, it is an astronomical cost. Granted, they can probably spread it out over a huge time period, but that just means even MORE cost with interest, etc.

Still, they put themselves in the "position" to be "blackmailed."

I would still probably go ahead and get it done, but some of the people who live in those areas are pretty low income types. Many older people, on what little retirement they get.

Anyway, the actual reality of the "Scare Tactics" in this particular case might be different, but I'm guessing it's not too far off from what could happen in a few pockets here like I described.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
You know John and Michele, you BOTH may be right on this issue. Since we don't have enough details from the original poster the connection between the roads/septic threat, that it may be that the neighbors are wanting a sewer system installed.

That road may be needed to be blacktopped because the city won't put them on their sewer system if they don't have paved roads. I've seen where the city/county has made it mandatory to put in paved roads so the people could get proper utilities. I wonder if this is one of those cases?

I do have a septic tank which I didn't know I had. My neighborhood is older. It's had some septic tank issues through-out the past few years. I am sure that if someone wanted to spear head a campaign to get us on City Sewage they would. However, that would mean an expense to each homeowner. The utilities won't do just a few houses, they have to do ALL the houses with that option.

That's exactly what the water company did in our HOA to put us on separate water meters. ALL 107 homeowners had to agree and pay $350 EACH to get their own water meter, there couldn't be one hold-out.

I think John and Michele you two pretty much hit the nail on the head on this situation, I am just tapping it in!

Former HOA President
BB2 (Missouri)
Posts: 36
Posted:
City sewer is not available to us and yes if in fact something were wrong it would be very costly to repair so what they are saying is if you pay the special assessment we won't call DNR like I said only a few benifit from the road improvement I still call this scare tactics or intimidation. (no the state, county do not own or maintain any of our road)
JohnC10 (Arizona)
Posts: 106
Posted:
A leaking septic system is an unhealthy condition. Why would anyone want to live with that? Spend the money on your septic system if it needs repair and take away their leverage. Unless of course you want the road and want others who don't want it to pay.
JoeW1 (New York)
Posts: 728
Posted:
JohnC10 - The post is about a scare tactic, strong arming, shakedown, whatever you call it when a threat seems to be used by an HOA as leverage on an unrelated issue. I doubt BB2 would allow a septic to remain leaky, that isn't the subject of his post or the advice that BB2 is seeking.
JohnC10 (Arizona)
Posts: 106
Posted:
Yeah well, I disagree. Remove the fear and it's no longer scary. It becomes a useless tactic.
BB2 (Missouri)
Posts: 36
Posted:
Seems to me if HOA's in an unrestricted subdivision are allowed to do this pretty soon they will find some way to tell you what color of Petunias to plant. No problem paying my fair share of road (1 lot) think the guy with 3 should pay for 3 no problem if my septic needs repaired just have a hard time with a HOA using threats to benefit
BB2 (Missouri)
Posts: 36
Posted:
a few.
JohnC10 (Arizona)
Posts: 106
Posted:
I would think that any lot with access to the new road should share in it's cost. If you feel the cost isn't being distributed equitibly then- protest. Don't contribute until they come up with a fair formula. If you're septic tank is up to code what could they possibly do? Skip paving in front of your lot? It would probably cost them more to stop and start the road again and make it usuable then to pave it uniformly.

I really don't understand why you think they have leverage over you.

Jadedone4 (Virginia)
Posts: 495
Posted:
I agree with JohnC and others there up to the point of "not paying the assessment." I would protest this completely up to the point of payment - and then pay the costs associated and then continue protesting. Once you have refused payment, you are opening up exposures that are in violation of your governing documents. If the board, or "powers that be..." fail to enforce the governing documents as appropriate (different assessment for different levels of lot ownership, etc), then this is also a point where you can protest and garner support from the courts.

As for the "septic tank" comments - really who cares what a threat is, if it is not enforceable, or can be executed? We all know that there are monetary fines for speeding down the local highway (threat), but we do it anyway. If we do not want to get a speeding ticket - then don't speed - if your tank is current and operating properly, there is no threat to you, that can be levied by the HOA.
PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
BB2: You really have not offered what your docs state for responsibility of maintenance/repair of the road. If it is not your community's responsibility, then no resident should be asked or expected to pay.

If the blacktopped road will be a 'nice to have' for some residents, then they (only) are the ones to chip in and pay, equally. There is no need for scare tactics at all.

PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
BB2: Further, to my prior post, if the road is not the association's responsibility, I wonder why and how the Board even got involved. It may be just a matter of the homeowners who want it, to settle the matter among themselves, work with the county or whoever owns the road, get the contractor and pay him to do it.
TracyT (Maryland)
Posts: 228
Posted:
Hi BB2:

Is this a vote for a "special assessment"? If so, in addition to the above posts, I would simply vote no on the matter. Tell your neighbors too.
PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
TracyT: I don't believe any Association's Board can levy a 'special assessment' or even an 'assessment fee' against residents to fund a project which is not the association's responsibility to fund.

But, until the poster explains further, we really don't know how it got to this point.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
This is the part that confuses me:

"Seems to me if HOA's in an unrestricted subdivision are allowed to do this pretty soon they will find some way to tell you what color of Petunias to plant."

If this is an unrestricted subdivision, how is there an HOA?
JohnC10 (Arizona)
Posts: 106
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BB2 on 09/09/2007 2:29 PM
No swim pool,club house, golf course nothing The HOA does not own the road or anything else... We only have 27 dues paying members.

If the HOA doesn't own anything and there are no resrictions what is the dues money used for?
BB2 (Missouri)
Posts: 36
Posted:
Dues are for trash and well maintenance (DNR) requires a licensed operator. Some of dues are to go to ROAD MAINTENANCE still can't justify $50,00.00 plus to benefit about 4 properties especially when one owns tree wants to pay for one and threatens to call in who ever they can think of in order to get their way
PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
BB2: You have not posted your role in your community and whether you are a Board member or one involved in the project to assess other homeowners....
actually, you have not posted any of the official writings of your association, and that is what is needed to know how to proceed.

However, again I repeat, homeowners CAN BE assessed all the Board wants to assess for road maintenance; however, IF the documents DO NOT state that the 'road' is part of the association's responsibility, the 'assessment' carries no weight.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here