Quote:
Posted By JoanQ on 06/28/2019 8:53 AM
The HOA choose not to update the electrical in this building because it was going to cost more money. A line failed and the power company came out to fix. When they saw the meter/circuit boxes they said everything will need to be updated before they would replace the power line. We have hired a electrical contractor to update and work with the power company. But one of the unit owners is full time and will need to vacate for 10 to 14 days. This is a post about compensation for her in the form of per diem and MIE. And if anyone thinks that the other unit owners should receive some type of compensation for loss of use.
I am thinking like NpS here as follows:
-- Members and HOA alike should check with their respective insurers.
-- I do not consider the HOA making the lawful choice not to update to be any kind of negligence. I mean, what are the affected members going to argue? 'Dear HOA, you should have chosen to update back then. Yes, it would have taken about the same number of days as today to update back in 2009. Yes, the HOA made a lawful choice and for reasons of budgeting. Still, we are angry we are so inconvenienced. Please pay us per diem and for meals and incidentals. Sincerely, Residents of Building XYZ.'
-- I would be scouring the governing documents to see what they say on the point.
-- I wonder if Davis-Stirling statute says anything helpful.
-- The health of a reserve fund is not measured in absolute dollars. Typically it is measured in terms of a metric known as, "Percent Funded."
-- I grant that, under these circumstances, the HOA is legally somewhat akin to a landlord. The residents pay for the upkeep of the electrical system. When it breaks, the HOA needs to fix it. But the landlord aspect has to be balanced against the shareholder aspect.
-- Given that I think there was no negligence, I am not wild about the MIE. At most, and if the HOA does have to pay something, pay for the hotel?
-- Consulting with an attorney is likely worthwhile.