💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

JenniferB14 (Colorado)
Posts: 148
Posted:
Hello all.... The statute of limitations in CO is 1 year for structures on the unit. I am trying to be more hypothetical versus specific, but how would an alteration to a NON ARC approved structure well after the statute of limitations be handled? Let's say children's play equipment was repainted to match the house from a weathered redwood, and the play structure was never ARC approved and is well beyond the statute of limitations. Could the HOA be successful in causing a violation of the non approved structure past the SOL for it being repainted? I would think that if the structure has not changed in kind (ie: caused a new addition to be added to the play structure) then the HOA has lost the ability to enforce due to the SOL being past. The other example would be a flagpole never having been approved and also well past the SOL where a different flag has been placed on the structure. Curious to see if other folks have experienced this in their HOA.
PaulJ6
Posts: 990
Posted:
I'm not a litigator, but I thought that the statute of limitations just means that you can't file a lawsuit after it expired. You could try other ways of enforcement, such as imposing fines by the HOA, even after the statute of limitations has expired.
JenniferB14 (Colorado)
Posts: 148
Posted:
good point, except here is the CO SOL:

38-41-119 "No action shall be commenced or maintained to enforce the terms of any building restriction concerning real property or to compel the removal of any building or improvement on land because of the violation of any terms of any building restriction unless said action is commenced within one year from the date of the violation for which the action is sought to be brought or maintained."

This is why I feel like if the improvement is unchanged in kind an attempt to enforce would end in vain for the HOA because ultimately if litigated they would have no standing. I feel like the wording in this law is pretty good to encompass any enforcement.
JenniferB14 (Colorado)
Posts: 148
Posted:
good point, except here is the CO SOL:

38-41-119 "No action shall be commenced or maintained to enforce the terms of any building restriction concerning real property or to compel the removal of any building or improvement on land because of the violation of any terms of any building restriction unless said action is commenced within one year from the date of the violation for which the action is sought to be brought or maintained."

This is why I feel like if the improvement is unchanged in kind an attempt to enforce would end in vain for the HOA because ultimately if litigated they would have no standing. I feel like the wording in this law is pretty good to encompass any enforcement.
JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
Not to play lawyer but as laws override any Covenants, the one year SOL may well apply regardless of what the Covenants say.
NpS (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 4,216
Posted:
Here's an interesting discussion with someone who calls himself Seattle Scott on the statute in question:

https://www.justanswer.com/real-estate-law/9itq7-question-relates-colorado-law-answer.html

Sikubali jukumu. Read all posts at your own risk.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
Np,

That is an interesting read from the attorney.

JenniferB14 (Colorado)
Posts: 148
Posted:
I do know Use restriction violations are different than improvements to the land, and honestly I do not believe there is any statute of limitations. Now if only Colorado had defined what a use restriction is! That would sure help in our community!
SheilaJ1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 291
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JenniferB14 on 06/16/2019 3:29 PM
Hello all.... The statute of limitations in CO is 1 year for structures on the unit. I am trying to be more hypothetical versus specific, but how would an alteration to a NON ARC approved structure well after the statute of limitations be handled? Let's say children's play equipment was repainted to match the house from a weathered redwood, and the play structure was never ARC approved and is well beyond the statute of limitations. Could the HOA be successful in causing a violation of the non approved structure past the SOL for it being repainted? I would think that if the structure has not changed in kind (ie: caused a new addition to be added to the play structure) then the HOA has lost the ability to enforce due to the SOL being past. The other example would be a flagpole never having been approved and also well past the SOL where a different flag has been placed on the structure. Curious to see if other folks have experienced this in their HOA.

The law doesn't apply to your scenario, the HOA can enforce on a non arc structure. If things have not been approved the HOA can come back years later and ask you to get approval plans and to fill out the proper application. This happens everyday in almost every HOA.
SheliaH (Indiana)
Posts: 6,964
Posted:
It's hard to say what a judge will and won't do - while I agree with Sheila, I try to stay away from hypotheticals like this. For instance, what if the owner is new to the community and wasn't told he/she is now responsible for any changes to the unit and the HOA may be within its rights to demand unapproved items be changed at his/her expense?

I'd also consider the change that was made and whether it's worth the association's time and legal expenses to pursue this - that could get lengthly, costly and really ugly. I might pursue if the item hasn't been well maintained, otherwise, I might let the person know what's what and grandfather it in (after finding out what he/she knew and when). Document all this and keep it in the file for that unit.

Instead. consider ways to prevent this. Every year, all homeowners should be reminded they are responsible for getting prior approval of certain exterior changes (provide a list) and do a community walk through once a year to see if anything's changed. If you don't have an exterior change request and approval on file, send those homeowners a notice - minor changes may simply require the paperwork to be filed, while you may want to pursue others. I might also assess a fine for failure to ask for permission. If you don't have a fining policy, check with your attorney to ensure you can do this and then ask his/her assistance in establishing a policy. Notify all homeowners of the new policy and an effective date - if you'll be doing a yearly inspection, tell them that as well. You might also encourage all owners to check their records to make sure they have approval records on file - they can ask for a copy from the property manager if necessary (make them pay printing and postage)

If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it. Marcus Aurelius
JenniferB14 (Colorado)
Posts: 148
Posted:
Sheila J1.... this is an ARC structure, or it should have been approved as one, 5 years ago. In other words this is an item that SHOULD have had ARC approval and did not, and I know for certain any improvement on the land for more than a year the HOA, nor any government body in CO can force or demand removal of such, or therefore attempt to coerce or enforce any building restriction of any kind. The example of the flag pole does not appear in our covenants however does appear in the ARC documents. If a policy has changed over the years not to allow any flags but the US flag, in your opinion, with the consideration of the fact that this improvement is past the limitations for enforcement of restrictions, would you believe that the HOA could not reasonably restrict flags placed on the pole?

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here