SteveS8 (New York)
Posts: 128
Posts: 128
Posted:
I write a blog for my New York Community of 720 homes. and have been doing it for over 11 years. It tells it like it is and in some cases, is not appreciated by the board; although many residents are very appreciative of the information which would never come to them otherwise.
Recently, the board created a rule that any resident who does not live in a given condo building may not visit it to inspect of photograph the interior. This came about because, for years, our alarm systems have shown problems, and whenever I would see the alarm in the lobby showing a problem, I would enter that building, take a picture, notify security of the alarm box beeping, and post the information on the blog. Additionally, when packages were left outside a condo building, I would bring them inside and leave them on the mail shelf in the lobby. If a package was misdelivered to the wrong building, I would email the resident to notify him or her. That, too, would be posted on the blog.
Cases of leaks in buildings, floods, and other issues were also carried by the blog.
I have just been fined $50 and have sent a letter to the Grievance Committee, which is likely not going to accomplish anything because 1/2 of that committee is made up of the board members who fined me.
Then, just recently, we were notified that the board, which had posted their meeting minutes as well as committee meeting minutes on the HOA website for 12 years, were no longer going to post the board minutes and anyone wanting to read them needed to go to the clubhouse and request to see them, but they could not take a copy or photograph them. Additionally, those minutes would now only "include only actions actually taken by the Board and not the recording of an individuals vote." And committee minutes would not be available at all.
The reason given was they were doing this on "advice of counsel" and the rationale behind this decision after all these years was:
"The attorneys for the HOA advised that the Board minutes of the HOA should not be published. The advice was based on the Not for Profit Law that only requires that corporate documents be available for inspection, and was also based on the By-Laws of the HOA that require only that the be available for inspection only."
and...
"One problem with releasing the corporate minute documents is that they can reveal a great deal that might be taken out of context and used against the Board or the HOA in a lawsuit. A second problem is the re-publication of the minutes by other sources can be easily accessed by anyone on the internet. Community problems and issues can then be seen by prospective purchasers which may deter them from a purchase."
I was curious how the members of this forum felt about this issue and I welcome feedback.
Thanks,
Steve S.
New York
Recently, the board created a rule that any resident who does not live in a given condo building may not visit it to inspect of photograph the interior. This came about because, for years, our alarm systems have shown problems, and whenever I would see the alarm in the lobby showing a problem, I would enter that building, take a picture, notify security of the alarm box beeping, and post the information on the blog. Additionally, when packages were left outside a condo building, I would bring them inside and leave them on the mail shelf in the lobby. If a package was misdelivered to the wrong building, I would email the resident to notify him or her. That, too, would be posted on the blog.
Cases of leaks in buildings, floods, and other issues were also carried by the blog.
I have just been fined $50 and have sent a letter to the Grievance Committee, which is likely not going to accomplish anything because 1/2 of that committee is made up of the board members who fined me.
Then, just recently, we were notified that the board, which had posted their meeting minutes as well as committee meeting minutes on the HOA website for 12 years, were no longer going to post the board minutes and anyone wanting to read them needed to go to the clubhouse and request to see them, but they could not take a copy or photograph them. Additionally, those minutes would now only "include only actions actually taken by the Board and not the recording of an individuals vote." And committee minutes would not be available at all.
The reason given was they were doing this on "advice of counsel" and the rationale behind this decision after all these years was:
"The attorneys for the HOA advised that the Board minutes of the HOA should not be published. The advice was based on the Not for Profit Law that only requires that corporate documents be available for inspection, and was also based on the By-Laws of the HOA that require only that the be available for inspection only."
and...
"One problem with releasing the corporate minute documents is that they can reveal a great deal that might be taken out of context and used against the Board or the HOA in a lawsuit. A second problem is the re-publication of the minutes by other sources can be easily accessed by anyone on the internet. Community problems and issues can then be seen by prospective purchasers which may deter them from a purchase."
I was curious how the members of this forum felt about this issue and I welcome feedback.
Thanks,
Steve S.
New York