DB8 (Washington)
Posts: 15
Posts: 15
Posted:
Hello, our HOA clubhouse has gender-specific gyms, locker rooms, bathrooms and shower areas. Each has a sauna as well. The two areas are separated by a very short hallway.
The gym area in the men's area is much larger than the women's, and it also contains more equipment, and equipment the women's doesn't have at all (nor is there room for it). Their locker area is larger too. This place was built in the 80's to accommodate a generation of people at the time who probably cared less about gender equality and staying in shape than we do today.
We are starting a conversation in our community about this, and some of us believe we have a discrimination issue based on sex. Each member in the community has to pay the same amount for HOA fees each year, yet the women do not have equal access to the same amenities.
We are optimistic that we can identify simple and inexpensive ways to visually block the areas where members might be undressed and thus give access to both genders to either gym at any time. But we also anticipate backlash from members who say they don't want to work out in the presence of the other gender. I believe the right to equal access to amenities would override the personal preference of members who don't want to work out around the other gender.
Upon examining state law on this (WA state) it's clear this would be discrimination if the amenity were public, but I'm not sure it applies to a private club. I'm interested to know how much of a legal leg we have to stand on here. Your thoughts would be appreciated.
Thank you.
The gym area in the men's area is much larger than the women's, and it also contains more equipment, and equipment the women's doesn't have at all (nor is there room for it). Their locker area is larger too. This place was built in the 80's to accommodate a generation of people at the time who probably cared less about gender equality and staying in shape than we do today.
We are starting a conversation in our community about this, and some of us believe we have a discrimination issue based on sex. Each member in the community has to pay the same amount for HOA fees each year, yet the women do not have equal access to the same amenities.
We are optimistic that we can identify simple and inexpensive ways to visually block the areas where members might be undressed and thus give access to both genders to either gym at any time. But we also anticipate backlash from members who say they don't want to work out in the presence of the other gender. I believe the right to equal access to amenities would override the personal preference of members who don't want to work out around the other gender.
Upon examining state law on this (WA state) it's clear this would be discrimination if the amenity were public, but I'm not sure it applies to a private club. I'm interested to know how much of a legal leg we have to stand on here. Your thoughts would be appreciated.
Thank you.