💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
I have spoken of this before:

History.
It occcured to me that the State would have some responsibility to Condo andd Hoas in regard to how our association is governed. Long story short, I posed the question, finally, to our SAO (States Attorney Offfice); What is the law concerning open meetings in association under the Law, Horizontal Property Act of SC, this law allows the association to be listed as a business and allows for the Regim to be Incorporated and also has a great deal of detail of the responsibility of the State. Our Documents discribe this Law as the top of our Hierarchy Level. They firsst responded they could not provide a private citizen with legal information and I should consult an attorney for an opinion. I stated I have an opinion I want to know what the Law says.
Then they say I will need to haave an elected representative to request this information from the SAO. So, I got my county councilman to request on my behalf. Then I hear that is not good enough, but they will not reply in writing to me, they have to have the question posed by the entire council (11 members). My ccouncilman says he doesn't think this is a Countty Council function and gave me the phone # of contact person in SAO. She says I could get a State Senator to ask the question for me, but she advised that even iff I do the SAO will not respond.

None of this is made up and aside from the newest conversation I had with SAO I have a an e-mail thread that verifies what I am saying. Conversation with the SAO revealed that the State of South Carolina considers all Condo and HOA government to be outside (OUTSIDE)the laws of the state and they have no power for enforcing or controlling any CC7R's devised by these associations.

Paul, Joe, Roger, Gloria, Judith and all the rest of you smart folks, give this considerable thought and see if there is anything I can do but hire a lawyer. Our Board lawyer was instrumental in writing our CC&R's and transferring the property to the association in 1981. Would his opinion be unbiased? The rule to hold open meetings was not included when our documents were written, there is no mention of it, they were not addressed when they were fully amended, all by the same attorney that we pay for advice today.
Our Board for the last 17 years will not ccnsider any question into the lagality of closed meeting, they just do it.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Exactly what is the issue? A little confused here. Are you saying your HOA BOD has closed meetings NOT open to the general membership? Or are you upset that the HOA BOD does have meetings on occassion where as general membership is NOT invited? There's a difference.

I have no problem with my HOA BOD having closed meetings on occassion. They are necessary at times. Although I never had an official "closed meeting", I did converse with my BOD members on subjects prior or after a meeting. That way we wouldn't spen all night talking about a subject. We could "cut to the chase" a bit. Plus whenever a resident had a request for work to be done at their common area, the BOD would convene to the house with that owner only to discuss and review the issue. Generally, we didn't invite the whole neighborhood to those type meetings. Just the surrounding neighbors if affected. Any decisions we made any of these situations we always spoke at the regular meeting. It's not that we are hiding anything, it's just the business decisions are up to the board ultimately. The general members elected the BOD to represent them to do the HOA daily business on their behalf.

I posted the above so you maybe get an idea of the "inside" workings of a HOA BOD and their actions. An outsider may view things differently. You have to keep in mind that you have multiple people with multiple opinions on how an HOA should operate that making any kind of decision is nearly impossible. So if your HOA is having closed meetings, it may be just so they can get a decision done. If you have 25 people at an open meeting voicing their loud opinion and only 5 people on your board, it would make sense that the BOD would want to excuse themselves behind closed doors. Deciding amongst 5 is a bit easier than 25. As long as they take the 25 opinions into consideration.

Although I am not into recommending lawyers to deal with your HOA, I may recommend you get a letter drafted by one if it will make you feel better. The HOA lawyer does NOT represent you as an individual so you don't go to them. You send the letter to them but you don't use that lawyer. You will have to get your own. However, you must REALLY want a result bad enough to go that route. Plus I would strongly recommend having more than one member on your side. Majority still rules in a HOA. If you get a majority of members on your side that feels the same way, it may be the better route to take than an attorney.

Former HOA President
PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
RobertR1: Sad, sad, sad...but I'm not surprised at the position they are taking (or not taking...) of a total lack of responsibility. So, it sounds like you may be ready to fight City Hall?...You are not deterred yet? You are a force to be reckoned with, me thinks!!!

The SC Horizontal Property Act states... SECTION 27-31-160. Provisions required in bylaws; modification of system of administration.
The bylaws must necessarily provide for at least the following:
(a) Form of administration, indicating whether this shall be in charge of an administrator or of a board of administration, or otherwise, and specifying the powers, manner of removal and, where proper, the compensation thereof;

(b) Method of calling or summoning the co-owners to assemble; that a majority of at least fifty-one percent is required to adopt decisions; who is to preside over the meeting and who will keep the minutes book wherein the resolutions shall be recorded;

Therefore, based on (b) above, what can we glean from this statement?

RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
RobertR1, I would try to amend the By-laws to require open Board meetings with the members being allowed to speek. You can check out Colorado's SB05-100 for wording that Senate Bill used.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Melissa,
I can't imagine this is confusing, but, to simplify.

Our condo has had closed regular meeting for years and years. 99% of our board members have been from out of town or out of state. They hold board
meeting by conference call, no notice is given, no invitations are extended. We are incorporated and formed under the Horizontal Property act of the State of SC. The state of SC decrees that HOA and CONDO asssociation business is OUTSIDE of the Laws of SC, therefore they will not provide a legal opinion about "closed" meetings.
I disagree aand feel the state has a responsibility as most states do.

Now let me say this Melissa. I have noticed you keep going over and over about how people can not understand what it is like to serve on a Board unless they have done it. In my case, that is utter nonsense. I know that I know as much about Board requirements and certainly about Condo CC&R's than than anyone I have met in the 17 years that I lived here. I played cop around here for 15 years and I spent countless hours, more than any Board member here in learning how this place operates. I am not completely dumb and ignorant, I have a keen interest about the place I live in and I care for this place as much if not more than any other. In my condo, I am respected by nearly all and I have disagreed with nearly all, but heart of hearts this place is getting their monies worth because I live here. So please, no sad song about the sudden acquirement of intelligence or dedication, about how being on the board elevates this p-erson to some exulted status and degards all the innate intelligence of folks not on the board. I know from where you are coming and you are right in some areas about how apathic and non-appreciative of Board members It is a tough job but so is walking the back alleys of Iraq, it's just a matter of degrees.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Thanks for the comments, I don't think this issue is dead yet. I still have a few more levers to pull. I hope they bear more fruit than what I have used in the past.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Paul,
I, like the Attorney General, glean nothing of substance from your quote.
Seems to me it would be a simple thing to add in there somewhere, "All regular meeting of the board will require notification to all owners and each owner shall be given access to participate at some specific time and speak for say three minutes and have his comments recorded into the minutes. I bet it wouldn't take up 15 minutes, our Board Meeting by telephone with five BOD and Manager can go on for hours. Our Annual meeting is open and scripted by the Board and it can go on for 4-5 hours.
And our Board president says that is all the communiocation the members need along with the Managers feel good, doing great reports and the Presidents letters he sends around when people start to get too close the nitty gritty.

JosephW (Michigan)
Posts: 882
Posted:
Unless the state HOA laws specifically include condo's and HOA's in the Open Meetings laws, then they are not obligated to follow them. Community Associations (and this was just re-affirmed in the Twin Rivers case in NJ) are not "governmental actors" and so are not bound by the same laws that apply to city councils, county boards, etc. And I don't think that the SC laws expand the open meetings to non-governmental organizations.

You have two choices, one internal, amend the bylaws as Roger pointed out. Get a petition going that basically says - we're not rocking the boat, we just want to know what's going on - and, second, get to your state legislator and ask them to extend the open meetings laws to cover condo's and HOA's. Barring either of those, your ability to attend board meetings will be limited based on who is on the board and their feelings towards open meetings.

One slightly sneaky way to get into the board meeting - offer to be the recording secretary - no one likes to take minutes and to dump that chore,m boards will often let someone else in. Since its Friday night and I've already killed a bottle of Chianti, I'll re-visit this Tuesday.

Hope everyone has a great Labor Day weekend

Joe


Joseph West
Official HOATalk.com Sponsor
Community Associations Network, LLC
www.CommunityAssociations.net

*See legal notice below (end of page) or go to www.hoatalk.com/legal
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Joe,
Very sober advice, Chianti or not, and much appreciated along with your promise to give this some thought. I really think we will be able to add a resolution to our By-laws that will dictate open meetings in our Condo and our HOA has always had open meetings.

As a Homeowner I think the practice of closed General Meetings is unacceptable, but Rome was not built in a day. I am very concerned with the position of our States Attorney and his position that the Law bestows his office no authority to oversee the governance of HOA's and Condo Associations. I wonder now if it is possible for the Enforcement authorities to actually take to trial violations such as fraud and crimes of this sort within the Associations. I am probably way off base here for a number of reasons, and need to direct my efforts to this open/closed meetings problem, as I see it.

South Carolina is one of those states that because of climate, Coast line, mountains and lots of beautiful rural areas, have, in the past twenty years realized a complete change in the demographics of the state, good and bad. The coast is now about wall to wall people, but still room for more, the mountain and lake areas and areas surrounding the largest cities are blooming like the flowers in a greenhouse. No one, at any State Government level could have planned for this explosive growth. But a few groups had the vision and set the building blocks for the state for the last twenty years and the next fifty years. Those groups were the ones that saw financial gain. The developers, the lawyers, the real estate people, the construction companies, the utilities, the bankers, the investors, mortgage companies, and some politicians. I am not debating the merits of any of them, just saying the growth was too fast, has created more problems than it solved, and the worst is yet to come.

In my opinion, the most serious effect this will have on this state is the overwhelming presence of absentee property owners (oxymoron?). What does it matter? XXXXXXXXXXXX It matters because these absentee property owners for the most part will never contribute their children to the communities XXXXXXXXXX.

From learning on this site and other places and methods it becomes clear that for South Carolina a very critical look by the legislatures is in order. We are way behind the curve at the state level. When I read of some states requirements as they pertain to HOA's and Condo's and then look at our State Statute I am mystified. I am acutely aware I have tunnel vision and a severe deficiet in knowledge to understand all the legal provisions of this total issue.

I am a windmill tilter to the core.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here