RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
I have spoken of this before:
History.
It occcured to me that the State would have some responsibility to Condo andd Hoas in regard to how our association is governed. Long story short, I posed the question, finally, to our SAO (States Attorney Offfice); What is the law concerning open meetings in association under the Law, Horizontal Property Act of SC, this law allows the association to be listed as a business and allows for the Regim to be Incorporated and also has a great deal of detail of the responsibility of the State. Our Documents discribe this Law as the top of our Hierarchy Level. They firsst responded they could not provide a private citizen with legal information and I should consult an attorney for an opinion. I stated I have an opinion I want to know what the Law says.
Then they say I will need to haave an elected representative to request this information from the SAO. So, I got my county councilman to request on my behalf. Then I hear that is not good enough, but they will not reply in writing to me, they have to have the question posed by the entire council (11 members). My ccouncilman says he doesn't think this is a Countty Council function and gave me the phone # of contact person in SAO. She says I could get a State Senator to ask the question for me, but she advised that even iff I do the SAO will not respond.
None of this is made up and aside from the newest conversation I had with SAO I have a an e-mail thread that verifies what I am saying. Conversation with the SAO revealed that the State of South Carolina considers all Condo and HOA government to be outside (OUTSIDE)the laws of the state and they have no power for enforcing or controlling any CC7R's devised by these associations.
Paul, Joe, Roger, Gloria, Judith and all the rest of you smart folks, give this considerable thought and see if there is anything I can do but hire a lawyer. Our Board lawyer was instrumental in writing our CC&R's and transferring the property to the association in 1981. Would his opinion be unbiased? The rule to hold open meetings was not included when our documents were written, there is no mention of it, they were not addressed when they were fully amended, all by the same attorney that we pay for advice today.
Our Board for the last 17 years will not ccnsider any question into the lagality of closed meeting, they just do it.
History.
It occcured to me that the State would have some responsibility to Condo andd Hoas in regard to how our association is governed. Long story short, I posed the question, finally, to our SAO (States Attorney Offfice); What is the law concerning open meetings in association under the Law, Horizontal Property Act of SC, this law allows the association to be listed as a business and allows for the Regim to be Incorporated and also has a great deal of detail of the responsibility of the State. Our Documents discribe this Law as the top of our Hierarchy Level. They firsst responded they could not provide a private citizen with legal information and I should consult an attorney for an opinion. I stated I have an opinion I want to know what the Law says.
Then they say I will need to haave an elected representative to request this information from the SAO. So, I got my county councilman to request on my behalf. Then I hear that is not good enough, but they will not reply in writing to me, they have to have the question posed by the entire council (11 members). My ccouncilman says he doesn't think this is a Countty Council function and gave me the phone # of contact person in SAO. She says I could get a State Senator to ask the question for me, but she advised that even iff I do the SAO will not respond.
None of this is made up and aside from the newest conversation I had with SAO I have a an e-mail thread that verifies what I am saying. Conversation with the SAO revealed that the State of South Carolina considers all Condo and HOA government to be outside (OUTSIDE)the laws of the state and they have no power for enforcing or controlling any CC7R's devised by these associations.
Paul, Joe, Roger, Gloria, Judith and all the rest of you smart folks, give this considerable thought and see if there is anything I can do but hire a lawyer. Our Board lawyer was instrumental in writing our CC&R's and transferring the property to the association in 1981. Would his opinion be unbiased? The rule to hold open meetings was not included when our documents were written, there is no mention of it, they were not addressed when they were fully amended, all by the same attorney that we pay for advice today.
Our Board for the last 17 years will not ccnsider any question into the lagality of closed meeting, they just do it.