💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

RichA3 (Arizona)
Posts: 48
Posted:
In my little corner of the world, Sun City, AZ, a homeowner can spend most of their time living back up north avoiding the oppressive desert heat here in the spring, summer, & sometimes even in the fall. Some are gone more than they are here. The only time these folks choose to be here is to avoid ice, snow, & severe cold. I am envious of course, as I can't afford to do the same. I have to stick it out here come hell & high heat. I have found that some of these, almost totally absent homeowners, do not mind one bit making my life even more miserable here when they are not. These absentee homeowners tend to support, so-called, natural landscaping...turning our oasis back to hot, arid, sand, rock, and cacti. As a result they vote to tear up mature landscaping, including trees, vegetation, and grass...turning neighborhoods into urban heat islands that reflect oppressive heat right back into our homes. This of course makes our lives here even more difficult when it's hot & air conditioning bills are higher. This at the same time when many urban areas are planting more trees and increasing vegetation cover to counter the adverse effects of climate change.
Bottom line: People who are not here year-round should not have a vote on any HOA association business & should never be allowed to serve on an HOA Board.
Wonder if any HOAs have full-time residency requirements that would serve such a purpose?
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
And they shouldn't have to pay one red cent in association assessment for the privilege. As a matter of fact, it would be appropriate if you picked up their tab.

Thank you very much.
RichA3 (Arizona)
Posts: 48
Posted:
Not a bad idea at all...it would be worth it to keep them from ruining it for everyone else! And we could make them pay in other ways too!
RichA3 (Arizona)
Posts: 48
Posted:
These are some of the same folks who try to lease or rent out their place when they are gone...to any damn loser who could care less about our neighborhood! Absentee owners are absolutely the worst!
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
The guiding principle of HOAs: all owners have the same rights and responsibilities. Any rule that attempts to change the rights of a subset of owners is discriminatory and would invite lawsuits, which the HOA would almost certainly lose.

Not what you wanted to hear, but that's life in an HOA.
GeorgeS21 (Florida)
Posts: 3,808
Posted:
Is the the point of natural landscaping to reduce the usage of water ... in this case water that doesn’t exist locally and has to be imported in some manner?

To the HOA issue - if you have a problem with folks renting (we call them Non Resident Owners - NROs), then change the CCRs to restrict renting ... if you can’t get this level of support, you’re probably going to need to find another neighborhood that restricts renting.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Don't you, George, mean Non-Owner-Residents?? I.e., renters or tenants?
RichA3 (Arizona)
Posts: 48
Posted:
Good point Cathy.
But us year-round residents also have a right to not be abused by other residents. You have no right to make my life more difficult, expensive, & even dangerous. That is exactly what happens when you tear out my shade trees, my grass, my vegetation. I suffer while you can afford to escape to cooler digs up north. It is just not right.
RichA3 (Arizona)
Posts: 48
Posted:
The point of natural landscaping to conserve tap water while reducing costs. As you know utility costs do nothing but increase. But those increased utility costs include electricity which each individual owner has to pay; water is an association expense. Electricity bills increase when the A/C runs harder because of the heat reflected into our homes by the gravel, rock, and sand forced on us primarily by snow birds who do not have to stick it out here when it is 110 in the shade. The interesting point is that associations with natural landscaping do not have lower association fees...our mature landscaping association costs are the same. In addition we are fighting that urban heat island affect & countering the effects of global warming.
RichA3 (Arizona)
Posts: 48
Posted:
We finally have rules that prohibit renting/leasing, thank God. Couple of renters still here as they were grandfathered in. Renters do not give one good God damn about our peaceful retirement community. Totally absent owners do not take care of their places either...they sit vacant forever. Typically happens when the owners are in a trust arrangement & Martha, the original occupant, has been dead for years.
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RichA3 on 02/18/2019 3:52 PM
Good point Cathy.
But us year-round residents also have a right to not be abused by other residents. You have no right to make my life more difficult, expensive, & even dangerous. That is exactly what happens when you tear out my shade trees, my grass, my vegetation. I suffer while you can afford to escape to cooler digs up north. It is just not right.

I understand your position. Here's what I would be thinking about if I lived in your community:

* First, you don't need a residency requirement. Folks who spend a good part of year elsewhere wouldn't be able to attend board meetings, which is the main duty of a board member (unless your state and Declaration allow electronic meetings). You can also point out that year-round residents know more about what's going on in a community, so all things being equal, they would probably do a better job as board members. These are valid points to make during an election and may convince voters to favor the year-round residents.

* I'd approach the issue of trees/vegetation/etc. with a cost-benefit analysis. Both sides have legitimate points. The green vegetation is attractive, provides shading and cuts utility costs, and the folks who live there part of the year also benefit from these things. However, the vegetation requires water which is a dwindling and ever more costly resource. A prolonged drought or falling water table could kill off a lot of plants and put a serious strain on the association's finances - and these things are well within the realm of possibility. Are there other ways to provide the benefits at a lower cost? I see room for eye-opening discussions here.

While most of us don't have to deal with extreme heat, many of us live in other areas where Mother Nature spends at least part of the year trying her best to kill us. Associations nearly always run very tight budgets, which means finances will drive a lot of our decisions and define the limits of what is doable. It costs money to fight Mother Nature and it's an ongoing battle, so communities have to decide for themselves how much money they're willing to throw at what may be a losing battle.
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RichA3 on 02/18/2019 4:17 PM
We finally have rules that prohibit renting/leasing, thank God. Couple of renters still here as they were grandfathered in. Renters do not give one good God damn about our peaceful retirement community. Totally absent owners do not take care of their places either...they sit vacant forever. Typically happens when the owners are in a trust arrangement & Martha, the original occupant, has been dead for years.

I'm assuming that your governing documents have some sort of language that require owners to keep up their property. If so, then the board just needs to enforce the requirement. It will probably be time-consuming and a pain if you're dealing with a trust, and it may need legal action, but the trust is bound by the same requirements as any other owner.

If your current board isn't doing their job, then it's time to elect new directors who have the community's interests at heart. Start talking to your neighbors and see if a group of like minded owners can field a candidate or two. Change can happen if enough people are willing to work for it.
GeorgeS21 (Florida)
Posts: 3,808
Posted:
Kerry - sorry if I wasn’t clear. I was talking about what we call the owners who are not residents. Non Resident Owners.
GenoS (Florida)
Posts: 4,276
Posted:
The only condo/HOA bill being considered this year in the Florida legislature is HB 155 which requires voting interests of homeowner association to physically reside in community in order to recall a board director. The bill was proposed by a state legislator whose district includes one of the largest HOAs in the state.

It provides that, "... any member of the board of directors may be recalled and removed from office with or without cause by a majority of the total voting interests who physically reside in the community."

If only full-time residents could vote in a recall effort, then the power of snowbirds (common term in Florida for seasonal part-time homeowners who close up their homes, i.e. don't rent them out, and go somewhere else for the summer) would be greatly curtailed. Any snowbird who got on the board and voted for something, like landscaping, that the locals didn't want could be recalled from the board by the locals only. The snowbirds would be unable to stop the recall, and thus their power could be drastically diminished. It would serve to dissuade owners who are part-time residents from even running for the board in the first place.

I don't see it gaining much traction and I expect the proposed HB 155 to go down in flames in the FL legislature. The state has forever taken a dim view of residency requirements when it comes to real estate.
RoyalP
Posts: 1,104
Posted:
? Suppose the 'snowbird(s)' in question have Florida as their state of residency as their tax status ?

'resident' is a slippery slope ESPECIALLY where HUD is involved

'full time' - does it allow for 60 day vacations ? 90 days ? 180 ?

IMO: the 'bill' is dead as worded - as is your idea
GenoS (Florida)
Posts: 4,276
Posted:
I don't know anything about tax status, all I'm saying is the result would be a residency requirement and that's not gonna fly in FL. It would remove the existing right to vote in a recall election from some homeowners and that's an impermissible alteration of contract rights in FL at least.
RoyalP
Posts: 1,104
Posted:
GenoS,

I was agreeing with YOU.

Their tax status would be proof that they ARE residents even if away for 182 days of the year.

JohnC46 (South Carolina)
Posts: 14,265
Posted:
I do not think Rich is complaining about the quality of the landscaping. He is complaining about the type of landscaping.
LetA (Nevada)
Posts: 2,679
Posted:
I don't think you noticed Rich, You live in desert climate and a land locked state with no body of water at your beck n call.
Xeriscape has been quite popular here in Las Vegas for quite some time now. I would love to have a green lawn at my house, but
to be honest I really don't miss mowing grass. Having desert landscape is the nature of the beast living in a desert climate.

We bought a brand new home a few years ago, and we planted some nice plants, shrubs and a couple of Italian Cypress trees.
Some of the plants attract humming birds, and I have a gecko that has taken up residence in my irrigation vault. Embrace the
desert life. There are plenty of great ways to landscape in the absence of a green lawn.
RichA3 (Arizona)
Posts: 48
Posted:
I embraced the desert oasis that I bought into when we moved to Sun City, AZ. For well over a half-century this Del Webb community has had wonderful mature landscaping...beautiful orange trees, plentiful bushes & shrubs, and lush grass. I will not give it up w/o a fight for sure. Everyday I lounge in front of my little patio home on the grass, my pets enjoy lounging in the grass too. Try lounging on desert landscaping! Of course the rich can afford the turf on golf courses & can afford to run away up north when the heat is on here at home. As you know, the rich can buy into (or out of) most anything. The middle class continues to be under attack by the fat cats. I will keep up the good fight.
RoyalP
Posts: 1,104
Posted:
? From where do you expect the 'middle class' to obtain water ?

In Arizona it is (almost) sinful to expend drinking water upon grass lawns.

Ask any native born
GeorgeS21 (Florida)
Posts: 3,808
Posted:
Hmmm ...

Rich, you talk about the rich and the rich running away up north ... and how you want to maintain the community as you found it ... with zillions of gallons of imported water... and everything would be fine except for those rich people ... and, well, the zillions of gallons of imported water.

I don't think you are going to be happy there, any longer ... perhaps it's time to leave for, er, greener pastures?
RichA3 (Arizona)
Posts: 48
Posted:
I love it here as long as rich, snow birds (aka snow flakes*) do not mess w me. Greener pastures up north include ice, snow, sleet, etc. which are bad for us seniors. One fall & it's over for us. I'll take my chances here, thank you so much!
*the term snow "flakes" I heard for the first time from a local Sun City hardware man. He say snow birds from the NE USA are dumber than rocks so he calls them snow flakes. They have absolutely no common sense as they are used to having others wipe their asses.
CathyA3 (Ohio)
Posts: 6,299
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RichA3 on 02/21/2019 12:08 PM
I love it here as long as rich, snow birds (aka snow flakes*) do not mess w me. Greener pastures up north include ice, snow, sleet, etc. which are bad for us seniors. One fall & it's over for us. I'll take my chances here, thank you so much!
*the term snow "flakes" I heard for the first time from a local Sun City hardware man. He say snow birds from the NE USA are dumber than rocks so he calls them snow flakes. They have absolutely no common sense as they are used to having others wipe their asses.

The greenery vs. xeriscaping issue is being decided based on economics and the realities of living in an area with extreme heat and dwindling water supplies. If you persist in personalizing the issue, rather than viewing it for what it is, you will not be happy with any reasonably achievable outcome.
GeorgeS21 (Florida)
Posts: 3,808
Posted:
Rich, I would find your thoughts pretty funny while at a neighborhood cocktail party - as long as you were not offensive.

However, should I find myself at a meeting - Board or otherwise - I would be far more cautious and try and delve deeper into your perspectives - unless you were offensive.

So, keep it funny and light ...
RoyalP
Posts: 1,104
Posted:
... in Arizona, however, it is 'sunny and bright' ...
RichA3 (Arizona)
Posts: 48
Posted:
Good advice George; I will try to follow it.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here