Quote:
Posted By GeorgeS21 on 02/08/2019 1:36 PM
Geno - I can't find it - can you ref the chapter and sub numbers, please?
Interestingly, my voluntary HOA operates as close to the 720 requirements as possible, even though it is a Chapter 617 organization - we left the 3 meeting option in our last bylaws rewrite.
You're probably fine, George, since you're not bound by FS 718 or FS 720. There are many arbitration rulings that affirm that the only ways to oust a director are those provided in the statutes. For HOAs, the wording is in FS 720.303(10) "RECALL OF DIRECTORS". It's virtually the same thing for condo associations.
DBPR Case No. 2016-02-9644 (Wilson vs Bayberry HOA) is relevant. Wilson claimed he was thrown off the board improperly. The HOA responded that it was following FS 617, the FL "Corporations Not For Profit" statute, instead of FS 720 and that the DBPR lacked jurisdiction to arbitrate FS 617 disputes. Here are some choice quotes from
the 5-page decision.
Quote:
Posted By DBPR Case No. 2016-02-9644 on 01/09/2017
There is no dispute that Petitioner (and two other board members) were removed from the board for each having absented themselves from three consecutive board meetings.
Petitioner was improperly removed as director of the board for the Association by the members of the board and by this order the Association will be compelled to immediately reinstate him.
A board of administration in general has no authority to remove a board member by board action.
Since Section 718.112(2)(k), Florida Statutes, "provides for removal of a board member by recall by the unit owners, the board may not remove a board member, notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in the condominium documents purporting to authorize board removal by board action."
To give this authority to the board would infringe upon the right of the unit owners to elect a representative of their choice and would in a given case give a board the opportunity to substitute its judgment for that of the owners on the issue of representation on the board.
If a board may willy-nilly remove board members following a duly conducted election, the board has the ability to change the outcome of any given election in a fundamental way.
There are at least a dozen DBPR arbitration rulings in similar cases that all reach the same conclusion. The FL legislature gives the power to remove board members to the owners, not the board. Since condos and HOAs are creatures of statute, the statutes will govern completely where explicit and the explicit statutory ways to remove someone from the board trump any provisions to the contrary in the association's governing documents.
These DBPR arbitration rulings are all in agreement (these are the only ones I have locally on my hard drive, there are more):
93-0137
94-0531
2002-00-5718
2003-08-3347
2004-01-1153
2008-00-4566
2008-05-2798
2009-00-3712
2010-05-6098
2011-02-8696
2014-00-9523
2014-03-7815