BethK8 (California)
Posts: 15
Posts: 15
Posted:
Hi all,
We have one unit in our building that is a timeshare. We are trying to learn more about them (they are grand fathered which I know we can change), but before we go to court and spend lots of money, we'd like to get their governing documents and know their owners. They wont tell us and said hire a lawyer. Our CC&R's basically give the Board the right to know this info and they are ignoring our requests.
I thought the Board could make a house rule that say if the HOA asks for info that the CC&R's say to to provide, the first time it's ignored, the owner gets 30 days to cure the issue, the second time, it's a $500 fine, the third time it's $5,000 and then the forth time it's $50,0000.
The issue is 10 couples own the time share and $5000 divided 10 ways is not going to hurt them. They are are a bunch of Silicon Valley lawyers and executives from what we can figure out.
Is this crazy? I know the California law says that fines need to be reasonable. But, I think you can make the argument that $50,000 is reasonable on the forth warning if you want it to be preventive.
I know we need to talk to a lawyer, but I've been wondering about this all day and it's an interesting question, so I thought I'd post and see what people had to say.
Thanks
Beth
We have one unit in our building that is a timeshare. We are trying to learn more about them (they are grand fathered which I know we can change), but before we go to court and spend lots of money, we'd like to get their governing documents and know their owners. They wont tell us and said hire a lawyer. Our CC&R's basically give the Board the right to know this info and they are ignoring our requests.
I thought the Board could make a house rule that say if the HOA asks for info that the CC&R's say to to provide, the first time it's ignored, the owner gets 30 days to cure the issue, the second time, it's a $500 fine, the third time it's $5,000 and then the forth time it's $50,0000.
The issue is 10 couples own the time share and $5000 divided 10 ways is not going to hurt them. They are are a bunch of Silicon Valley lawyers and executives from what we can figure out.
Is this crazy? I know the California law says that fines need to be reasonable. But, I think you can make the argument that $50,000 is reasonable on the forth warning if you want it to be preventive.
I know we need to talk to a lawyer, but I've been wondering about this all day and it's an interesting question, so I thought I'd post and see what people had to say.
Thanks
Beth