💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

GaryW12 (Alabama)
Posts: 56
Posted:
Hoa made a motion to not hire a lawyer 2nd to last board meeting.

At the next (lastest board meeting) meeting the treasurer had a report that had a lawyer fee to the tune of 500.00 without the board approval.
She said that it was solely the Presidents decision. (she sounded in her voice like she was trying to remove herself from that decision)

Does something sound wrong here?

I thought that if the board had a meeting to not do something, that the president could not go over their head and do something anyway?

Would it be possible for the board to call each other on the phone and approve something, or would they have to do that at an official board meeting?

There were no executive, emergency or other meetings between these two meetings.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Well it depends on the situation... From my own experience I've found lawyers do charge for various services differently. Those may include consultation, email correspondence, or writing a letter etc.. Not all consultations are free. So could it be that the lawyer sent a bill and the President did not know it was a chargeable situation? Could have been a mistake not understanding how lawyers work and charge. I didn't know it cost me $28 for an email or a phone call.

Former HOA President
DouglasK1 (Florida)
Posts: 2,046
Posted:
Gary,

The president should only have the powers and duties as defined by your bylaws or other governing documents. This would typically not include spending association funds that had not been approved by the board.

Are you on the board? The first line of defense against a president acting beyond their authority would be the rest of the board. If they are just lapdogs for the president, then there is not much to keep the president from acting beyond that authority. If the rest of the board is against the president acting this way, they probably have the option of electing another president. Most governing docs have the members (homeowners) elect the directors, and the directors elect the officers. In most cases the officers have to be directors, but some governing docs do not require this. In this case, the board could not remove the president from their position as director, but could elect a different president.

Escaped former treasurer and director of a self managed association.
GaryW12 (Alabama)
Posts: 56
Posted:
Well, the bylaws say the president with the approval of the board can spend up to XYZ, anything over XYZ must go to the community.

He spent to the dollar what he could spend without bringing a community vote. But the treasurer said "The check was written as it was the cap limit on what could be written before bringing it to the community and that it was approved by (president). Treasurer did not say it was approved by the board.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
If there is a Board Resolution, and it could be from 20 years ago, allowing the President to spend up to a specific amount of money, then yes. My former Board allowed the President to spend up to $5000.00 without Board authorization, just basically gave him a blank check.
DouglasK1 (Florida)
Posts: 2,046
Posted:
If the majority of the board does feels the president is not doing a good job, they can elect a new president. If most of the board is ok with how the president is doing things, most likely nothing will change.

Escaped former treasurer and director of a self managed association.
GaryW12 (Alabama)
Posts: 56
Posted:
That is a shame about that limit. If I ever run for the board I'll say that anything over 75.00 dollars must be approved by the community. too much waste going on around here.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By GaryW12 on 07/30/2018 9:32 PM
That is a shame about that limit. If I ever run for the board I'll say that anything over 75.00 dollars must be approved by the community. too much waste going on around here.

Now, that would be micromanaging.
JenniferG11 (Texas)
Posts: 667
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By GaryW12 on 07/30/2018 9:32 PM
That is a shame about that limit. If I ever run for the board I'll say that anything over 75.00 dollars must be approved by the community. too much waste going on around here.

LOL
JenniferG11 (Texas)
Posts: 667
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By GaryW12 on 07/30/2018 8:35 PM
Well, the bylaws say the president with the approval of the board can spend up to XYZ, anything over XYZ must go to the community.

He spent to the dollar what he could spend without bringing a community vote. But the treasurer said "The check was written as it was the cap limit on what could be written before bringing it to the community and that it was approved by (president). Treasurer did not say it was approved by the board.

I think you answered your own question. Lacking majority board approval, no he wasn't supposed to do that according to your by-laws.

GeorgeS21 (Florida)
Posts: 3,808
Posted:
$75.00?

🙂
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
Since your board didn't approve the expenditure, the president was wrong, and the Board is wrong to let him get away with it.

sounds like you're not on the board, Gary?
JoyceR2 (Virginia)
Posts: 156
Posted:
In todays world & even before stealing HOA funds has been made easy for many because Boards do not take seriously enough how to protect the associations funds. There should be written procedures that protect to the fullest extent these funds & it should apply to every Board member & MC all the time. Because one member is totally honest that does not mean every member is honest. Why even take that chance. To many ways to skim off money. No single member should have the authority to spend a dime by his/her own decision. Yes, micromanage the homeowners/association funds no different than if it was your personal finances. Doubt will always get you an education.
SharonW3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 30
Posted:
Transparency is always the best way to go. With rare exception, expenditures are approved by board vote. The exceptions are calls for service when something is necessary. As president, I want the board to be aware of, and approve, money being spent.
JoyceR2 (Virginia)
Posts: 156
Posted:
That is how it should be. On the table in plain view check & balances documented. Same rules apply to all & everyone is accountable. To many on Boards sit there & never engage allowing 1 or 2 take control & blindly lead them. Volunteer or not it requires responsibility by all. Every account, fund, etc., should have safeguards in place.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By GaryW12 on 07/30/2018 7:20 PM
Hoa made a motion to not hire a lawyer 2nd to last board meeting.

At the next (lastest board meeting) meeting the treasurer had a report that had a lawyer fee to the tune of 500.00 without the board approval.
She said that it was solely the Presidents decision. (she sounded in her voice like she was trying to remove herself from that decision)

Does something sound wrong here?

I thought that if the board had a meeting to not do something, that the president could not go over their head and do something anyway?

Would it be possible for the board to call each other on the phone and approve something, or would they have to do that at an official board meeting?

There were no executive, emergency or other meetings between these two meetings.

Did the HOA or did the Board make a motion? Unless I am wrong, the community doesn't vote at Board meeting, Board members do.

I see where people want to vote on something that is already in a budget. Let's say you a $10K line item for legal, would you want the Board or community to approve a $500 expenditure for a lawyer?

Currently, an HOA I manage is going through a series of repairs, which have a line item in their annual budget of $30K. The Board had a $1000 limit on any expenditure I can approve without a Board vote. If the repair is over $1K it gets approved at the monthly Board meeting, under that, I approve after informing them.

ALL financial information involving any of my HOA's is available to the Board 24/7 through each association's secure web portal.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
This isn't about transparency, it's about authorization. Was Gary's prez authorized to spend this? Or not?

Actually, Richard, we have an annual line item for our HOA attorney, but the board still approves asking him for his written opinion on something.

On the other hand, our prop. mgr. (PM) is authorized to spend $5,000 without board approval for infrastructure necessities.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 3,868
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KerryL1 on 08/06/2018 4:55 PM
This isn't about transparency, it's about authorization. Was Gary's prez authorized to spend this? Or not?

Don't know, as there is issues going back and forth between the Board approving something and the community. Someone needs to get a grip, anything over $75.00 would require a community vote in Gary's opinion. Count me out.
KerryL1 (California)
Posts: 14,550
Posted:
I actually thought the $75 limit was Gary's way of joking. Anyway, he seems to have lost interest in his question.
GaryW12 (Alabama)
Posts: 56
Posted:
Ours is set at 500.00 by the boards approval. I think that it should be lower.

The board somehow manages to have around 9000 in the bank account at all times.

But I'm just working this backwards, I'm convincing people not to pay the voluntary fee & that way the board will realize since they do not help us with our deed restricitons , we wont help them with their "requests for free money"..
GaryW12 (Alabama)
Posts: 56
Posted:
To give everyone a idea, they only write about 3 checks a month , maybe 4.

This community owns no property, so there is not much to really be doing.
GenoS (Florida)
Posts: 4,276
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By GaryW12 on 08/06/2018 8:25 PM
To give everyone a idea, they only write about 3 checks a month , maybe 4.

This community owns no property, so there is not much to really be doing.

Every place is unique so if a low limit spending cap on the president works for you then that's great. I'm in a 100 home HOA and the association owns considerable common property. We have detailed accounting and financial procedures that were written by a former owner who was a CPA. The board approved them about 5 years ago and we've been adhering to them ever since. Are they perfect? No, but they're comprehensive and workable.

Every expense has to fit into one of our budget categories and there are 3 different kinds of expenses, not including emergencies. The president has the authority to spend up to $3,000 without board approval so long as the money has been budgeted in advance. Between 3 and 5 thousand requires 3 board members to sign off on. Anything over $5,000 that's not a recurring expense has to be approved by a board majority at a meeting. By and large we haven't seen a need to updated the spending thresholds.

The president earlier this year circumvented the procedures by splitting a pet project up into individual parts each costing less than $3,000 and then personally approving each expense. This was despite clear wording in the procedures that forbids doing exactly that in order to get around the limits. In any case, that person is no longer the president because of unrelated circumstances. Most worrying: Despite the clear violation of the spirit and the letter of our procedures, no one really cared that they were being violated.

If we required the board to vote on every expenditure over $75 our meetings would be 4 hours long.
PainintheA
Posts: 77
Posted:
..... If we required the board to vote on every expenditure over $75 our meetings would be 4 hours long. .....


How about:

required the board to vote on every expenditure over $75 not already 'covered' by an approved budget (line) item

simple
SusanK12 (Florida)
Posts: 3
Posted:
(Not sure if I should start a new thread, but thought it would fit into this discussion so here goes...)

We have an incorporated cooperative association. Our president went to the attorney without getting a board vote and ran up a $700 bill. The board didn’t even know about it until the Treasurer was asked to approve payment. The bill was paid to avoid getting taken to court, then the other board members removed him from office and appointed someone else to serve as President. He is not being cooperative regarding reimbursement, so how do we get the shareholder’s money returned to them? Our documents are silent on the matter of expenditures and expenditure limits (they are 30 years old).

Thanks in advance for your thoughts.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By SusanK12 on 08/16/2018 12:09 AM
(He is not being cooperative regarding reimbursement, so how do we get the shareholder’s money returned to them?

You take them to court (small claims if possible)

Keep in mind that if the other person wins, they are indemnified, meaning the HOA pays their legal bills.

Quote:
Posted By SusanK12 on 08/16/2018 12:09 AM

Our documents are silent on the matter of expenditures and expenditure limits (they are 30 years old).

This is where accurate minutes are needed to document the Boards decisions.
The minutes are the official record and will be needed in court to prove the President acted beyond their authority and should reimburse the Association.

Keep in mind, this might be better as an expensive lesson to the Association to have written policies in place to cover these things vs. actual legal action.
KellyM3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 2,239
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By GaryW12 on 07/30/2018 7:20 PM
Hoa made a motion to not hire a lawyer 2nd to last board meeting.

At the next (lastest board meeting) meeting the treasurer had a report that had a lawyer fee to the tune of 500.00 without the board approval.
She said that it was solely the Presidents decision. (she sounded in her voice like she was trying to remove herself from that decision)

Does something sound wrong here?

I thought that if the board had a meeting to not do something, that the president could not go over their head and do something anyway?

Would it be possible for the board to call each other on the phone and approve something, or would they have to do that at an official board meeting?

There were no executive, emergency or other meetings between these two meetings.

Your documents may grant the president authority to handle certain business matters that cost up to a certain threshold. Also...what's common sense in this case? Is the board investigating a matter and the $500 fee gets the whole board the answers it requested of the president? If so......

Whether allowed or not, in my experience, it's best to call a meeting or await the next business meeting to handle HOA business so people have the option to observe and offer feedback. Make that effort and your dues payers will, at least, respect your approach even if they greatly disagree on the policy.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here