JenniferG11 (Texas)
Posts: 667
Posts: 667
Posted:
I think our BODs feel that an awful lot they think is confidential actually is not. For example, whether a board member was voted off or resigned. The difference matters, because they are not permitted to vote someone off, unless it is for cause, like they committed a felony or disqualified themselves from serving by falling behind on dues, etc.
It seems to always be a secret here unless one can talk to the person directly and then you have to decide whether to believe them. Rumors go around. People say 'I don't know if Bob resigned or was voted off', and everyone I talk to believes that it's proper for the BOD *to* vote people off, including me until a few hours ago. :-) The board always just says there was a change, giving no reason why or how.
This should not be a secret, or else there is no way for members to know whether it was proper. Rogue boards could dispatch with the will of the voters. Conspire to get rid of so and so and get so and so on, so they can run the table (which, I admit, in some circumstances would be ok with ME, depending on who we are talking about :p, but if it isn't proper, it isn't proper).
I don't even think 'removed for cause' is enough, since that doesn't tell us what the cause allegedly was, again, we don't know if it's valid.
It seems to always be a secret here unless one can talk to the person directly and then you have to decide whether to believe them. Rumors go around. People say 'I don't know if Bob resigned or was voted off', and everyone I talk to believes that it's proper for the BOD *to* vote people off, including me until a few hours ago. :-) The board always just says there was a change, giving no reason why or how.
This should not be a secret, or else there is no way for members to know whether it was proper. Rogue boards could dispatch with the will of the voters. Conspire to get rid of so and so and get so and so on, so they can run the table (which, I admit, in some circumstances would be ok with ME, depending on who we are talking about :p, but if it isn't proper, it isn't proper).
I don't even think 'removed for cause' is enough, since that doesn't tell us what the cause allegedly was, again, we don't know if it's valid.