šŸ’¬ Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚔ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

KcG (Washington)
Posts: 2
Posted:
I am trying to find a DVD set or book on how a HOA should run; we have new board members (and are a board of just 2 years) and many of us have never been part of a HOA. Any suggestions? We are looking for something that can be passed on each year to the new board members.
Thanks,
KC
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
For starters, look to the left of your posted question. You will see Community Associations Network. Looks like a good place to start to me.
JeanneK3 (Maryland)
Posts: 562
Posted:
I'll endorse RobertR1's suggestion. CAI's GAP publications are excellent and I've taken two of their courses. I applaud your willingness to take training. I wish my board would; my condo would be in better shape.
GloriaM (North Carolina)
Posts: 829
Posted:
KC:

You can also try a book I wrote for Boards of Directors, homeowners its called A Guide to Community Living you may access the publishers site at:

www.PublishAmerica.com/books/4573
LouiseH (California)
Posts: 10
Posted:
Gloria M
I saw your message about not letting a renter of a condo have amenties, but our BOD's, lawyer said that was not a good idea. We have a pool, which the owner's father is the renter and his kids use the pool. We pay for cable and we had that turned off, but the father had it turned back on. The owner is behind almost 6 months. The BOD is now trying to collect this debt. The owner's address is the condo's address. If we made several attemps to delivered mail there and it is accepted, then we can assume(which I don't like to use) is living there since we never received back any mail.
So we should be able to place a lein on the property.
GloriaM (North Carolina)
Posts: 829
Posted:
Louise:

Although my post stated the HOA could suspend the use of amenitites, but through the proper process. The HOA should file a lien on the Owner for delinquent dues, hold a hearing for the Owner and then suspend the right to use the amenities.
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Sorry, GloriaM, I do have to disagree with witholding the amenities from Renters if their owner's are delinquent. The HOA can NOT withold amenity use from a renter. That's because the HOA can not interfere with the "Owner/Renter" contract. The HOA can restrict the amenity access to the OWNER but not to whomever the owner rents that property to.

I had a homeowner who refused to pay dues and a special assessment for over 2 years. The former president supposedly had placed a lien on the property prior to my election. However, the homeowner STILL refused to pay the dues/special assessment. I finally decided to start foreclosure proceedings. The owner did NOT live in the HOA. She had a "Rent-to-Own" contract with the person residing in the house. (She had been charging "extra" to the renter who planned on purchasing the home). We sent certified letters to the home in the HOA. We were also able to get her "real" address from Tax records and other sources to contact. The letters of legal action should only go to the HOA home which is the legal address of the home in the HOA.

The owner stated that she was refusing to pay the dues because the lawncare people had done damage to her home. Which if it was true, should have been presented to the BOD and forwarded to the lawncare who has insurance to cover such claims. There was a special assessment she also refused to pay because it would have made her responsible for paying for her own water bill. The assessment had passed and she was the only hold out. (We used to share one water meter but had them separated). The owner was generally not a nice person to deal with and quite threatening at times.

The Renter of the home was a good person. She was getting taken advantage of by the owner unbenowst to her. Once we started the foreclosure process, the owner had to give notice to her renter. Who was none to happy to be forced to move out of her home she thought she was purchasing. She left it a mess intentionally for the owner. The owner had tried to force the Renter to pay the back dues as well. She tried to say that if the renter wanted to use the HOA's amenities she had to pay the back dues. Which is NOT true. ONLY the owner can pay the dues. The HOA can deny the owner the right to the clubhouse and pool. They can't touch the renter. Our HOA didn't even stop mowing the members yard during this whole period.

It took about 3 months to finally foreclose on the property. It turns out, that it's really irrelevant about the home address of the owner once the foreclosure or lien process begins. That's because the law requires a PUBLIC notice printed in the newspaper. Just like an unresponsive spouse when one is trying to get a divorce. Once it's printed in the newspaper that your HOA intends to file a lien or foreclosure, it's public knowledge and the owner is part of this "knowledge".

In the end, the house sold at Public auction. The HOA got it's money and got rid of the owner. (The money a few months late due to a forgetful lawyer). The house sat abandon for awhile. Unfornately, a pipe broke in the home flooding the downstairs causing several thousands dollars damage. HUD picked up the house and eventually sold it. Just recently, the former renter sued the owner for all the "extra" money she had paid for the property and won. (I testified at the trial).

What I describes was most likely the WORST case scenerio a HOA will have to face. It takes ALOT of skill, knowledge, and support to go through a foreclosure. I wouldn't suggest a newcomer to a HOA try this. Go for just liens first before you tread into the worst case scenerio of your BOD life.

Former HOA President
GloriaM (North Carolina)
Posts: 829
Posted:
Wow Melissa such a long story, but if you read my post it says "OWNERS".
KcG (Washington)
Posts: 2
Posted:
Thanks for the responses. I didn't find what I was looking for, although I did find some other items of interest. I thought I had bookmarked the place that I saw this training manual and DVDs but have not seen the same since.

Thanks again.
Kelley
CharlesW1 (Georgia)
Posts: 826
Posted:
MelissaP1,

It is always very inspiring to read your posts. It’s apparent you have an overwhelming amount of experience and are very knowledgeable about HOA, dos and don’ts. However,I would have to whole heartily disagree, with YOU!

I’m certainly not saying all renters are problem tenants, but there are some. Answer these questions for me, please? Why should an HOA (basically) condone non payment of assessments, fines, etc, by allowing their tenants to use the amenities? Why would any BOD ā€œallowā€ such behavior?

IMO, (as a homeowner in an HOA community, first and foremost), I personally don’t feel that I should be ā€œfrontingā€ the expenses of such amenities for those who don’t pay to enjoy. That makes absolutely no sense what’s so ever.

I’m appalled, that you would even say such a thing!

Shame on you and anyone else reading your post, who thinks by not restricting their (tenants) access into the amenities or use of (which is for HO in good standings-mind you) is the right course of action to pursue. That’s ludicrous!

If, by law an HOA can not restrict the tenants (of a lot owner) than so be it. I would need to inform my board that their philosophy is wrong, otherwise I will continue to deny access or use of any/all amenities provided to the members(in good standings) of my community.

Thanks for given such great advice.

Chuck W


Charles E. Wafer Jr.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
A question or two?

If your documents provide certain restrictions on renting property, such as notification of the rental to the Regime Office outlining who and how many people are going to be in the units and that type requirements and the owner does not follow these Rules nor is there any standard rental agreement used in the HOA or condo and no rental records are kept by the Regime; does violation of these requirements place the owner in a non compliance status and as such would not be able to rent property or his tenants allowed to use facilities???

It is evident, at least in a condo, that the inforcement of the rules has to be through the owner leaves a lot of holes and blank spaces. Believe me, if the Board refuses to acknowledge the Rental section of your documents completely or partially, and the owners are scattered all over the place, problems will arise that requires the owners living in their home to have some involvement.

There really doesn't seem to be a solution to this, as far as I can see, but it is also evident the Regime opens up the legal gates when it does not enforce their covenants. That has to be the first step in any control issues in HOA's, do you all agree?
PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
CharlesW1: I wholeheartedly agree with you in withholding amenity privileges from owners who are remiss in payment of required fees. It is, after all, the fee which funds those amenities for the community as a whole.
I realize that if the amenities are few (lawn maintenance/snow removal) it is more difficult to withhold these since it does impact the entire community. However, to withhold pool or clubhouse and sports privileges if available, IMHO, is fair to all.

This brings up another thought regarding owners vs. tenants. If a tenant is renting, and they are able to make use of the amenities (per the owner), how does the association monitor the tenant's privileges? Is there an ID card for the pool in the owners' name or the address itself?
So, if the owner is remiss in dues payments, the tenant is withheld from the amenity of the pool/clubhouse? How would this be handled?

Chuck, nice to hear from you again. It's been a long time!!!
CharlesW1 (Georgia)
Posts: 826
Posted:
PaulM,

As you are aware I haven’t been responding or posted to many (if any) discussions. I’m still in the process of learning the do’s and the don’ts of an HOA.

I would like to thank you and everyone whose provide excellent advice and have posted such great suggestions to HOATalk.com. I have and continue to learn so much from all of you with your informative/detailed posts.

Our elections are scheduled for September 11th (911!) I have placed my name on the elections ballot in hopes to obtain a seat as a board member, for the second straight year. I’ve always been involved in my community, but even more so with the advice shared on this HOA site has encourage me to run another year!

I’ve become consumed with bettering my HOA. Everything we (two other board members & I) have done, I feel (like many of you) that I had to run or everything we had done will go to the waste side. I certainly couldn’t allow that to happen. I feel as if I’d be letting me and my family down.

It’s sad to think, but it is unfortunately the true.

Our sub-division has come a long way and I refuse to sit by and watch it become what it once was.

I’m always reading the posts written on a majority of posts discussed.

I’ll try to keep in touch as often as possible.
Chuck W.

Charles E. Wafer Jr.
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 08/30/2007 4:08 PM
Sorry, GloriaM, I do have to disagree with witholding the amenities from Renters if their owner's are delinquent. The HOA can NOT withold amenity use from a renter. That's because the HOA can not interfere with the "Owner/Renter" contract. The HOA can restrict the amenity access to the OWNER but not to whomever the owner rents that property to.

I disagree with your logic Meliissa. The right to use an amenity can be withheld from the owner of a property for which the assessments are delinquent. An owner may not transfer the right to use to their renter when they have no right to use the amenity.

On a previous thread the association's right to require approval of rental contracts was discussed. Add this item to the list
MelissaP1 (Alabama)
Posts: 13,836
Posted:
Hey, I didn't say I LIKED the policy. I completely 100 percent agree that the tenant should be limited from amenities if the owner is behind in dues. However, the HOA has no control over the owner/tenant agreement. That's NOT my choice. I can't force a bad renter to move out. I can ONLY contact the owner and have the owner deal with their own property. The same with a bad owner, I can't force the owner to sell their home. I can force them to pay the dues by foreclosing on them, which isn't the same as forcing them to leave. A foreclosure STOPS as soon as the owner pays what is owed. Plus they regain their right to vote if they become up to date with their dues. I now have to honor their membership rights.

In our setup, we can't deny yard mowing or garbage pickup. (We used to be able to stop the water to the house, but we got separate water meters now.) The yards are small and connected and the garbage is an open dumpster. The pool area has it's own combo lock but there's no real policy on NOT giving it to non-payers or renters. Renters are considered "Guests" of a member. The only amenity owners can't use is the clubhouse if they were behind in dues. Renters weren't allowed to rent the clubhouse at all or attend meetings. So our HOA essentially, couldn't deny many amenities. We placed liens on their property which got their attention more than amenity denial.

I would like to use this example to explain why Renter's shouldn't be denied amenities because of the owner. Let's say you rent a Cottage every summer at the beach. It's on an exclusive private beach in which residents pay for access. However, the cottage owner your renting from doesn't pay their share. You already paid your rent for a place with beach access. It's part of the contract. You arrive at the beach and are told to get out by other members. What is your reaction going to be? You paid your money for access to the beech. The owner was responsible to make sure you got it. Are you not going to say you have a right to that beach no matter what the owner did? You can't pay the owner's membership fee either. That's the scenerio renters face when their owners don't pay their dues.

Former HOA President
BradP (Kansas)
Posts: 2,640
Posted:
Melissa:

In our HOA owners are granted use of amentities, not renters. Our definition of a member is someone who holds an interest in a lot, not someone who rents. Therefore we don't even have to allow goodstanding renters use of our areas. But to your statement that the HOA can't stop renters, they sure can. If the owner is deliquent they lose common area privileges and the HOA is well within its right to stop renters.
BradP (Kansas)
Posts: 2,640
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MelissaP1 on 08/31/2007 4:39 PM

I would like to use this example to explain why Renter's shouldn't be denied amenities because of the owner. Let's say you rent a Cottage every summer at the beach. It's on an exclusive private beach in which residents pay for access. However, the cottage owner your renting from doesn't pay their share. You already paid your rent for a place with beach access. It's part of the contract. You arrive at the beach and are told to get out by other members. What is your reaction going to be? You paid your money for access to the beech. The owner was responsible to make sure you got it. Are you not going to say you have a right to that beach no matter what the owner did? You can't pay the owner's membership fee either. That's the scenerio renters face when their owners don't pay their dues.

In that case if I was the renter I would ask for a partial if not complete refund because the owner fraudulently rented and promised things to me that they know don't exist. The owner knows or should know the rules that if they are delinquent or don't pay that amenities are taken away. They are committing fraud if they promise those things to renters and know they are delinquent. The renter has a great case for court and the owner might want to get a haircut that goes with pinstripes or an orange jumpsuit. The HOA must protect its assests by punishing those who don't pay.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
BradP,
Not to mention that in condos, if they allow renting by looking the other way or by not following the requirements for rentals as discribed in the CC&R's, they are probably setting up the whole association for a Law suit.
It's been that way around here forever.
THey .....meaning the Board.

šŸŽÆ You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • āœ“ Ask follow-up questions
  • āœ“ Share your experience
  • āœ“ Get expert advice
  • āœ“ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚔ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here